Systemic resistance in sugar beet eliciated by non-pathogenic, phyllosphere-colonizing Bacillus pumilus and B. subtilus against the pathogen Cercospora beticola Sacc.

A. Esh, M. Atia, M. Tohamy, S. Taghian
{"title":"Systemic resistance in sugar beet eliciated by non-pathogenic, phyllosphere-colonizing Bacillus pumilus and B. subtilus against the pathogen Cercospora beticola Sacc.","authors":"A. Esh, M. Atia, M. Tohamy, S. Taghian","doi":"10.21608/JPPP.2011.84657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A total of 10 Bacillus subtilis (7) and Bacillus pumilus (3) isolates from sugar beet phyllosphere were evaluated for its biocontrol activity against sugar beet cercospora leaf spot disease (CLS) under greenhouse and field conditions compared to the fungicide Topsin M70. PR-related proteins, chitinase, β-1,3-glucanase, peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase as well as indol acetic acid were determined in treated and untreated sugar beet plants. Under greenhouse conditions the reduction in disease severity caused by B. subtilis and B. pumilus treatments ranged from 73.33 80% and 80 83% respectively. Under field conditions the reduction ranged from 56.18 to 81.27% and 62.55 to 81.27% from B. subtilis and B. pumilus respectively. The levels of the determined PR proteins significantly increased in all the treated plants either with B. subtilis or B. pumilus. In addition, the levels of IAA were higher in the treated plants compared to the untreated plants. The sucrose percentage increased in the treated plants compared to the infected untreated control. The present study suggested the role of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus pumilus in inducing plant acquired resistance.","PeriodicalId":16965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plant Protection","volume":"176 1","pages":"67-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plant Protection","FirstCategoryId":"1091","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/JPPP.2011.84657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

A total of 10 Bacillus subtilis (7) and Bacillus pumilus (3) isolates from sugar beet phyllosphere were evaluated for its biocontrol activity against sugar beet cercospora leaf spot disease (CLS) under greenhouse and field conditions compared to the fungicide Topsin M70. PR-related proteins, chitinase, β-1,3-glucanase, peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase as well as indol acetic acid were determined in treated and untreated sugar beet plants. Under greenhouse conditions the reduction in disease severity caused by B. subtilis and B. pumilus treatments ranged from 73.33 80% and 80 83% respectively. Under field conditions the reduction ranged from 56.18 to 81.27% and 62.55 to 81.27% from B. subtilis and B. pumilus respectively. The levels of the determined PR proteins significantly increased in all the treated plants either with B. subtilis or B. pumilus. In addition, the levels of IAA were higher in the treated plants compared to the untreated plants. The sucrose percentage increased in the treated plants compared to the infected untreated control. The present study suggested the role of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus pumilus in inducing plant acquired resistance.
非致病性叶层定植的矮芽孢杆菌和亚芽孢杆菌对甜菜Cercospora beticola Sacc的系统性抗性。
在温室和田间条件下,以甜菜根球中分离的枯草芽孢杆菌(Bacillus subtilis, 7)和矮秆芽孢杆菌(Bacillus pumilus, 3)为对照,比较了杀菌剂Topsin M70对甜菜根孢子叶斑病(CLS)的生物防治效果。测定了处理和未处理甜菜植株中pr相关蛋白、几丁质酶、β-1,3-葡聚糖酶、过氧化物酶、多酚氧化酶和吲哚乙酸的含量。在温室条件下,枯草芽孢杆菌和矮秆芽孢杆菌处理对病害严重程度的降低幅度分别为73.33.80%和8083%。在田间条件下,枯草芽孢杆菌和矮芽孢杆菌的减少率分别为56.18% ~ 81.27%和62.55% ~ 81.27%。在枯草芽孢杆菌和矮秆芽孢杆菌处理的所有植物中,测定的PR蛋白水平均显著升高。此外,处理植株的IAA含量高于未处理植株。与未处理的对照相比,处理植株的蔗糖百分比有所增加。本研究提示枯草芽孢杆菌和细芽孢杆菌在诱导植物获得性抗性中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信