Treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with either low- or high-volume of convalescent plasma versus standard of care: A multicenter Bayesian randomized open-label clinical trial (COOP-COVID-19-MCTI).

Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Journal of Geophysical Research Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.lana.2022.100216
Alice T W Song, Vanderson Rocha, Alfredo Mendrone-Júnior, Rodrigo T Calado, Gil C De Santis, Bruno D Benites, Carolina Costa-Lima, Taiani Vargas, Leonardo S Marques, Juliana C Fernandes, Felipe C Breda, Silvano Wendel, Roberta Fachini, Luiz V Rizzo, José Mauro Kutner, Vivian I Avelino-Silva, Rafael R G Machado, Edison L Durigon, Sylvie Chevret, Esper G Kallas
{"title":"Treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with either low- or high-volume of convalescent plasma <i>versus</i> standard of care: A multicenter Bayesian randomized open-label clinical trial (COOP-COVID-19-MCTI).","authors":"Alice T W Song, Vanderson Rocha, Alfredo Mendrone-Júnior, Rodrigo T Calado, Gil C De Santis, Bruno D Benites, Carolina Costa-Lima, Taiani Vargas, Leonardo S Marques, Juliana C Fernandes, Felipe C Breda, Silvano Wendel, Roberta Fachini, Luiz V Rizzo, José Mauro Kutner, Vivian I Avelino-Silva, Rafael R G Machado, Edison L Durigon, Sylvie Chevret, Esper G Kallas","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2022.100216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Administration of convalescent plasma may serve as an adjunct to supportive treatment to prevent COVID-19 progression and death. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 volumes of intravenous convalescent plasma (CP) with high antibody titers for the treatment of severe cases of COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a Bayesian, randomized, open-label, multicenter, controlled clinical trial in 7 Brazilian hospitals. Adults admitted to hospital with positive RT-PCR for SARS-CoV2, within 10 days of the symptom onset, were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive standard of care (SoC) alone, or in combination with 200 mL (150-300 mL) of CP (Low-volume), or 400 mL (300-600 mL) of CP (High-volume); infusion had to be performed within 24 h of randomization. Randomization was centralized, stratified by center. The primary outcome was the time until clinical improvement up to day 28, measured by the WHO ten-point scale, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Interim and terminal analyses were performed in a Bayesian framework. Trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04415086.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between June 2, 2020, and November 18, 2020, 129 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to SoC (<i>n</i> = 42), Low-volume (<i>n</i> = 43) or High-volume (<i>n</i> = 44) CP. Donors presented a median titer of neutralizing antibodies of 1:320 (interquartile range, 1:160 to 1:1088). No evidence of any benefit of convalescent plasma was observed, with Bayesian estimate of 28-day clinical improvement of 72.7% (95%CI, 58.8 to 84.7) in the SoC versus 64.1% (95%ci, 53.8 to 73.7) in the pooled experimental groups (mean difference of -8.7%, 95%CI, -24.6 to 8.2). There was one case of cutaneous mild allergic reaction related to plasma transfusion and one case of suspected transfusion-related acute lung injury but deemed not to be related to convalescent plasma infusion.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>In this prospective, randomized trial of adult hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19, convalescent plasma was not associated with clinical benefits.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo.</p>","PeriodicalId":15836,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research","volume":"84 1","pages":"100216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8923059/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2022.100216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Administration of convalescent plasma may serve as an adjunct to supportive treatment to prevent COVID-19 progression and death. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 volumes of intravenous convalescent plasma (CP) with high antibody titers for the treatment of severe cases of COVID-19.

Methods: We conducted a Bayesian, randomized, open-label, multicenter, controlled clinical trial in 7 Brazilian hospitals. Adults admitted to hospital with positive RT-PCR for SARS-CoV2, within 10 days of the symptom onset, were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive standard of care (SoC) alone, or in combination with 200 mL (150-300 mL) of CP (Low-volume), or 400 mL (300-600 mL) of CP (High-volume); infusion had to be performed within 24 h of randomization. Randomization was centralized, stratified by center. The primary outcome was the time until clinical improvement up to day 28, measured by the WHO ten-point scale, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Interim and terminal analyses were performed in a Bayesian framework. Trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04415086.

Findings: Between June 2, 2020, and November 18, 2020, 129 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to SoC (n = 42), Low-volume (n = 43) or High-volume (n = 44) CP. Donors presented a median titer of neutralizing antibodies of 1:320 (interquartile range, 1:160 to 1:1088). No evidence of any benefit of convalescent plasma was observed, with Bayesian estimate of 28-day clinical improvement of 72.7% (95%CI, 58.8 to 84.7) in the SoC versus 64.1% (95%ci, 53.8 to 73.7) in the pooled experimental groups (mean difference of -8.7%, 95%CI, -24.6 to 8.2). There was one case of cutaneous mild allergic reaction related to plasma transfusion and one case of suspected transfusion-related acute lung injury but deemed not to be related to convalescent plasma infusion.

Interpretation: In this prospective, randomized trial of adult hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19, convalescent plasma was not associated with clinical benefits.

Funding: Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo.

用低容量或高容量复原血浆治疗重症 COVID-19 患者与标准护理相比:多中心贝叶斯随机开放标签临床试验(COOP-COVID-19-MCTI)。
背景:输入康复血浆可作为支持性治疗的辅助手段,预防COVID-19的恶化和死亡。我们的目的是评估高抗体滴度的两倍量静脉注射康复血浆(CP)治疗 COVID-19 重症病例的有效性和安全性:我们在巴西 7 家医院开展了一项贝叶斯、随机、开放标签、多中心对照临床试验。症状出现 10 天内 RT-PCR 检测出 SARS-CoV2 呈阳性的入院成人均符合条件。患者被随机分配(1:1:1)至单独接受标准护理(SoC),或与 200 毫升(150-300 毫升)CP(低容量)或 400 毫升(300-600 毫升)CP(高容量)联合使用;输液必须在随机分配后 24 小时内进行。随机化是集中进行的,按中心进行分层。主要结果是在意向治疗人群中,根据世卫组织十点量表测量的截至第28天的临床改善时间。中期和终期分析在贝叶斯框架下进行。试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册:NCT04415086.Findings:2020年6月2日至2020年11月18日期间,129名患者入组并随机分配到SoC(n = 42)、低容量(n = 43)或高容量(n = 44)CP。捐献者的中和抗体滴度中位数为 1:320(四分位间范围为 1:160 至 1:1088)。没有证据表明康复血浆有任何益处,贝叶斯估计 28 天临床改善率为 SoC 72.7%(95%CI,58.8 至 84.7),而汇总实验组为 64.1%(95%CI,53.8 至 73.7)(平均差异为 -8.7%,95%CI,-24.6 至 8.2)。有一例皮肤轻度过敏反应与血浆输注有关,一例疑似输血相关急性肺损伤,但被认为与康复血浆输注无关:在这项针对重症COVID-19成人住院患者的前瞻性随机试验中,康复血浆与临床获益无关:巴西科学、技术和创新部、圣保罗州研究基金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research
Journal of Geophysical Research 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Geophysical Research (JGR) publishes original scientific research on the physical, chemical, and biological processes that contribute to the understanding of the Earth, Sun, and solar system and all of their environments and components. JGR is currently organized into seven disciplinary sections (Atmospheres, Biogeosciences, Earth Surface, Oceans, Planets, Solid Earth, Space Physics). Sections may be added or combined in response to changes in the science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信