Studying Administrative Law: A Methodology for, and Report on, New Empirical Research

2区 法学 Q1 Social Sciences
E. Elliott, P. Schuck
{"title":"Studying Administrative Law: A Methodology for, and Report on, New Empirical Research","authors":"E. Elliott, P. Schuck","doi":"10.4324/9781315183770-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"article reports on an empirical study of some broad trends in federal administrative law that was recently concluded. Although the complete study is published elsewhere,1 we also report our findings here for two reasons. First, we hope to broaden the audience for this research, especially among practicing administrative lawyers. We believe that the study provides some important and intriguing new perspectives on a number of issues: the changing style of appellate decisions in administrative law; the evolution of administrative law since the mid1 960s; the patterns of remands to administrative agencies; and the effects of the Supreme Court's Chevron decision. Second, we wish to call particular attention to the methodology of our study in the hope that other researchers will use it to probe additional questions of interest to administrative lawyers and scholars.2","PeriodicalId":51730,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315183770-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"法学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

article reports on an empirical study of some broad trends in federal administrative law that was recently concluded. Although the complete study is published elsewhere,1 we also report our findings here for two reasons. First, we hope to broaden the audience for this research, especially among practicing administrative lawyers. We believe that the study provides some important and intriguing new perspectives on a number of issues: the changing style of appellate decisions in administrative law; the evolution of administrative law since the mid1 960s; the patterns of remands to administrative agencies; and the effects of the Supreme Court's Chevron decision. Second, we wish to call particular attention to the methodology of our study in the hope that other researchers will use it to probe additional questions of interest to administrative lawyers and scholars.2
行政法研究:一种新的实证研究方法与报告
文章报告了最近总结的联邦行政法的一些广泛趋势的实证研究。虽然完整的研究发表在其他地方,但出于两个原因,我们在这里也报告了我们的发现。首先,我们希望拓宽本研究的受众,特别是在职行政律师。我们认为,这项研究为以下几个问题提供了一些重要而有趣的新视角:行政法上诉判决风格的变化;20世纪60年代中期以来行政法的演变行政机关还押模式;以及最高法院对雪佛龙案判决的影响。其次,我们希望特别注意我们的研究方法,希望其他研究人员将使用它来探索行政律师和学者感兴趣的其他问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信