The closed circuit rebreather (CCR): is it the safest device for deep scientific diving?

IF 0.4 Q4 Engineering
Norro Alain
{"title":"The closed circuit rebreather (CCR): is it the safest device for deep scientific diving?","authors":"Norro Alain","doi":"10.3723/UT.34.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The closed circuit rebreather (CCR) is not a new diving technology. From the late 1990s CCR units were commercially available in Europe, and increasingly more divers, and among them scientific divers, have been trained to use them. Even if many benefits exist for using CCR for all diving depth ranges, it is in the deep diving zone ranging from 50 m to 100 m of sea water where the main advantages to using this equipment exist. Using rebreathers does carry additional risks, and these must be mitigated to ensure safe usage. A standard for CCR scientific diving has existed for many years in the USA, and the levels of expertise within the European scientific diving community are now sufficient for a European standard to be established. National legislation for occupational scientific diving in many cases excludes CCR diving, which can limit its use for scientific purposes. This paper suggests that, where possible, legislations should be allowed to evolve in order to include this type of equipment where and when its use has direct advantages for both the safety and the efficiency of scientific diving. This paper provides a brief description of the fundamentals of closed circuit rebreather diving and outlines the benefits that its use offers diving scientists. Special attention is given to safety issues with the assertion that the CCR concept is, if strictly applied, the safest available technique today for autonomous deep scientific diving purposes.","PeriodicalId":44271,"journal":{"name":"UNDERWATER TECHNOLOGY","volume":"83 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNDERWATER TECHNOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3723/UT.34.031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The closed circuit rebreather (CCR) is not a new diving technology. From the late 1990s CCR units were commercially available in Europe, and increasingly more divers, and among them scientific divers, have been trained to use them. Even if many benefits exist for using CCR for all diving depth ranges, it is in the deep diving zone ranging from 50 m to 100 m of sea water where the main advantages to using this equipment exist. Using rebreathers does carry additional risks, and these must be mitigated to ensure safe usage. A standard for CCR scientific diving has existed for many years in the USA, and the levels of expertise within the European scientific diving community are now sufficient for a European standard to be established. National legislation for occupational scientific diving in many cases excludes CCR diving, which can limit its use for scientific purposes. This paper suggests that, where possible, legislations should be allowed to evolve in order to include this type of equipment where and when its use has direct advantages for both the safety and the efficiency of scientific diving. This paper provides a brief description of the fundamentals of closed circuit rebreather diving and outlines the benefits that its use offers diving scientists. Special attention is given to safety issues with the assertion that the CCR concept is, if strictly applied, the safest available technique today for autonomous deep scientific diving purposes.
闭路换气器(CCR):它是深海科学潜水最安全的设备吗?
闭路换气器(CCR)并不是一项新的潜水技术。从20世纪90年代末开始,CCR装置在欧洲商业化,越来越多的潜水员,其中包括科学潜水员,已经接受了使用它们的培训。即使在所有潜水深度范围内使用CCR都有很多好处,但在50米至100米的深海潜水区,使用该设备的主要优势存在。使用呼吸机确实会带来额外的风险,必须减轻这些风险以确保安全使用。CCR科学潜水标准在美国已经存在多年,欧洲科学潜水界的专业水平现在足以建立欧洲标准。在许多情况下,职业科学潜水的国家立法不包括CCR潜水,这可能限制其用于科学目的。本文建议,在可能的情况下,立法应该允许发展,以包括这种类型的设备,当它的使用对科学潜水的安全和效率都有直接的好处。本文简要介绍了闭路换气潜水的基本原理,并概述了其使用为潜水科学家提供的好处。特别注意安全问题,并断言,如果严格应用CCR概念,则是当今自主深潜科学目的最安全的可用技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
UNDERWATER TECHNOLOGY
UNDERWATER TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING, OCEAN-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信