Exploring clinicians’ experiences of how efficient virtual elective knee clinics are compared to traditional face-to-face clinics

IF 0.8 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Ronan Henry
{"title":"Exploring clinicians’ experiences of how efficient virtual elective knee clinics are compared to traditional face-to-face clinics","authors":"Ronan Henry","doi":"10.1108/jica-10-2022-0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Efficient delivery of integrated healthcare requires solid alliances and collaboration with stakeholders on a regular basis. Due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), it has become necessary to explore new ways of delivering integrated healthcare, and virtual clinics have offered one solution and are likely to continue due to the uncertainty with COVID-19. This study aims to explore clinicians’ experiences of how efficient virtual elective knee clinics (VEKC) are in an orthopaedic setting in comparison to traditional face-to-face clinics.Design/methodology/approach The study utilised a mixed-methods study to obtain qualitative and quantitative data. This involved an anonymous online survey in addition to in-depth qualitative interviews conducted with a purposive sample of multidisciplinary colleagues who work with the VEKC in an acute hospital.Findings Three overarching themes and nine sub-themes emerged in the qualitative analysis. Overall, clinicians in both the quantitative and qualitative aspects of the study highlighted several ways that virtual clinics are efficient from both the patient and health service perspective. However, participants also highlighted barriers in relation to virtual clinics not being suitable for certain cohorts of patients and pathologies.Originality/value This is the first study in Ireland to provide valuable insights into the experiences of multidisciplinary clinicians using VEKC and their efficiency compared to traditional face-to-face clinics.","PeriodicalId":51837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jica-10-2022-0051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Efficient delivery of integrated healthcare requires solid alliances and collaboration with stakeholders on a regular basis. Due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), it has become necessary to explore new ways of delivering integrated healthcare, and virtual clinics have offered one solution and are likely to continue due to the uncertainty with COVID-19. This study aims to explore clinicians’ experiences of how efficient virtual elective knee clinics (VEKC) are in an orthopaedic setting in comparison to traditional face-to-face clinics.Design/methodology/approach The study utilised a mixed-methods study to obtain qualitative and quantitative data. This involved an anonymous online survey in addition to in-depth qualitative interviews conducted with a purposive sample of multidisciplinary colleagues who work with the VEKC in an acute hospital.Findings Three overarching themes and nine sub-themes emerged in the qualitative analysis. Overall, clinicians in both the quantitative and qualitative aspects of the study highlighted several ways that virtual clinics are efficient from both the patient and health service perspective. However, participants also highlighted barriers in relation to virtual clinics not being suitable for certain cohorts of patients and pathologies.Originality/value This is the first study in Ireland to provide valuable insights into the experiences of multidisciplinary clinicians using VEKC and their efficiency compared to traditional face-to-face clinics.
探索临床医生的经验,如何有效的虚拟选择性膝关节诊所与传统的面对面诊所进行比较
有效地提供综合医疗保健需要定期与利益攸关方建立稳固的联盟和协作。由于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19),有必要探索提供综合医疗保健的新方法,虚拟诊所提供了一种解决方案,并且由于COVID-19的不确定性,可能会继续下去。本研究旨在探讨临床医生的经验,与传统的面对面诊所相比,虚拟选择性膝关节诊所(VEKC)在骨科环境中的效率如何。设计/方法/方法本研究采用混合方法研究获得定性和定量数据。这包括一项匿名的在线调查,以及对在一家急症医院与VEKC合作的多学科同事进行的深入定性访谈。定性分析中出现了三个总主题和九个子主题。总的来说,临床医生在研究的定量和定性方面都强调了虚拟诊所从患者和卫生服务的角度来看是有效的几个方面。然而,参与者也强调了与虚拟诊所不适合某些患者和病理相关的障碍。这是爱尔兰的第一项研究,为使用VEKC的多学科临床医生的经验及其与传统面对面诊所相比的效率提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Integrated Care
Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信