Oszustwo podatkowe na przykładzie wystawienia fikcyjnych faktur VAT

Piotr Kobylski
{"title":"Oszustwo podatkowe na przykładzie wystawienia fikcyjnych faktur VAT","authors":"Piotr Kobylski","doi":"10.18778/2391-6478.s2.2022.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article. In the literature, you can find quite extensive studies on value added tax, while the issue of tax fraud on the example of issuing fictitious VAT invoices from the perspective of the effect of Art. 56 § 1 of the Act of September 10, 1999 – Fiscal Penal Code has been treated quite fragmentarily. The main research objective of this study is to characterize the impact of the above-mentioned legal regulation in determining the scope of its impact on the tax law system. The work will prove that it is actually unjustified to maintain the current structure of the model of the right to deduct this tax. In connection with the above, the aim of the work will be to assess the directions of changes in the analyzed institution against the background of the applicable legal provisions. Methodology. It was created on the basis of an analysis of the content of legal acts and documents as well as studies of the subject literature. The result of the research. The taxpayer should not be held responsible for unlawful actions of third parties with regard to the fulfillment of the tax obligation in the tax on goods and services. Based on the considerations, it can be concluded that as long as the current structure of the model of the right to deduct tax on goods and services is maintained, this issue will still remain open.","PeriodicalId":34805,"journal":{"name":"Finanse i Prawo Finansowe","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finanse i Prawo Finansowe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-6478.s2.2022.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this article. In the literature, you can find quite extensive studies on value added tax, while the issue of tax fraud on the example of issuing fictitious VAT invoices from the perspective of the effect of Art. 56 § 1 of the Act of September 10, 1999 – Fiscal Penal Code has been treated quite fragmentarily. The main research objective of this study is to characterize the impact of the above-mentioned legal regulation in determining the scope of its impact on the tax law system. The work will prove that it is actually unjustified to maintain the current structure of the model of the right to deduct this tax. In connection with the above, the aim of the work will be to assess the directions of changes in the analyzed institution against the background of the applicable legal provisions. Methodology. It was created on the basis of an analysis of the content of legal acts and documents as well as studies of the subject literature. The result of the research. The taxpayer should not be held responsible for unlawful actions of third parties with regard to the fulfillment of the tax obligation in the tax on goods and services. Based on the considerations, it can be concluded that as long as the current structure of the model of the right to deduct tax on goods and services is maintained, this issue will still remain open.
本文的目的。在文献中,你可以找到相当广泛的关于增值税的研究,而从1999年9月10日《财政刑法》第56条第1款的影响角度来看,以伪造增值税发票为例的税务欺诈问题得到了相当零散的处理。本研究的主要研究目的是表征上述法律规定在确定其对税法体系的影响范围方面的影响。这项工作将证明,维持这种税收抵扣权模式的现行结构实际上是不合理的。就上述而言,这项工作的目的将是在适用法律规定的背景下评估所分析机构的变化方向。方法。它是在对法律行为和文件内容的分析以及对主题文献的研究的基础上创建的。研究的结果。纳税义务人在货物和劳务纳税中,对第三人履行纳税义务的违法行为不承担责任。综上所述,只要现行商品和服务抵扣权模式的结构维持不变,这一问题仍将悬而未决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信