Path-Goal Theory – Leadership Styles and their Changes during Covid-19 Pandemic

IF 0.6 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Robert Fabac, Karolina Kokot, Irena Bubalo
{"title":"Path-Goal Theory – Leadership Styles and their\n Changes during Covid-19 Pandemic","authors":"Robert Fabac, Karolina Kokot, Irena Bubalo","doi":"10.7906/indecs.20.4.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most significant leadership theory, within the frame of contingency and situational approaches, is the path-goal theory. This theory is an extension of Vroom's expectancy theory and defines four styles of leadership: directive, supportive, participative, and achievement-oriented. The theory was first defined in the '70s, and since then, numerous studies have been conducted on leaders and subordinates in different industries and countries. Research during the COVID-19 pandemic is underrepresented, especially in Croatia, and the authors identified a research gap. Primary quantitative research was conducted, and data were collected through the questionnaire developed by Northouse (A Path-Goal Theory Investigation of Superior Subordinate Relationships). The research sample encompassed 77 leaders of organizations in the private and public sectors in the Republic of Croatia, and the researchers analysed self-assessment results about leadership styles before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were analysed to obtain insight into the frequency of leadership styles, differences in leadership styles before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the impact of gender, level of education, and organization size on leadership style. The results indicate that self-assessment defines minor changes to leadership style preference before and during the pandemic. The results indicate a difference in leadership styles according to gender;women more frequently choose the supportive style of leadership. Furthermore, it emerges that the level of education and the organization size have an impact on other leadership styles in the frame of the path-goal theory.","PeriodicalId":54126,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.20.4.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The most significant leadership theory, within the frame of contingency and situational approaches, is the path-goal theory. This theory is an extension of Vroom's expectancy theory and defines four styles of leadership: directive, supportive, participative, and achievement-oriented. The theory was first defined in the '70s, and since then, numerous studies have been conducted on leaders and subordinates in different industries and countries. Research during the COVID-19 pandemic is underrepresented, especially in Croatia, and the authors identified a research gap. Primary quantitative research was conducted, and data were collected through the questionnaire developed by Northouse (A Path-Goal Theory Investigation of Superior Subordinate Relationships). The research sample encompassed 77 leaders of organizations in the private and public sectors in the Republic of Croatia, and the researchers analysed self-assessment results about leadership styles before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were analysed to obtain insight into the frequency of leadership styles, differences in leadership styles before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the impact of gender, level of education, and organization size on leadership style. The results indicate that self-assessment defines minor changes to leadership style preference before and during the pandemic. The results indicate a difference in leadership styles according to gender;women more frequently choose the supportive style of leadership. Furthermore, it emerges that the level of education and the organization size have an impact on other leadership styles in the frame of the path-goal theory.
路径-目标理论——领导风格及其在Covid-19大流行中的变化
在权变方法和情境方法的框架内,最重要的领导理论是路径-目标理论。该理论是Vroom期望理论的延伸,定义了四种领导风格:指令性、支持性、参与性和成就导向型。这一理论最早是在70年代定义的,从那时起,人们对不同行业和国家的领导者和下属进行了大量研究。在COVID-19大流行期间的研究代表性不足,特别是在克罗地亚,作者发现了一个研究缺口。进行初步定量研究,通过Northouse (A Path-Goal Theory Investigation of上下级关系)开发的问卷收集数据。研究样本包括克罗地亚共和国私营和公共部门组织的77名领导人,研究人员分析了他们在COVID-19大流行之前和期间的领导风格自我评估结果。对数据进行分析,以了解领导风格的频率、新冠疫情前和疫情期间领导风格的差异,以及性别、受教育程度和组织规模对领导风格的影响。结果表明,自我评估确定了大流行之前和期间领导风格偏好的微小变化。结果表明,不同性别的领导风格存在差异,女性更多地选择支持型领导风格。此外,在路径-目标理论框架下,教育程度和组织规模对其他领导风格也有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems
Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信