QoE in 10 seconds: Are short video clip lengths sufficient for Quality of Experience assessment?

Peter Fröhlich, S. Egger, R. Schatz, M. Mühlegger, Kathrin Masuch, B. Gardlo
{"title":"QoE in 10 seconds: Are short video clip lengths sufficient for Quality of Experience assessment?","authors":"Peter Fröhlich, S. Egger, R. Schatz, M. Mühlegger, Kathrin Masuch, B. Gardlo","doi":"10.1109/QoMEX.2012.6263851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Standard methodologies for subjective video quality testing are based on very short test clips of 10 seconds. But is this duration sufficient for Quality of Experience assessment? In this paper, we present the results of a comparative user study that tests whether quality perception and rating behavior may be different if video clip durations are longer. We did not find strong overall MOS differences between clip durations, but the three longer clips (60, 120 and 240 seconds) were rated slightly more positively than the three shorter durations under comparison (10, 15 and 30 seconds). This difference was most apparent when high quality videos were presented. However, we did not find an interaction between content class and the duration effect itself. Furthermore, methodological implications of these results are discussed.","PeriodicalId":6303,"journal":{"name":"2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience","volume":"8 1","pages":"242-247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"54","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2012.6263851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

Abstract

Standard methodologies for subjective video quality testing are based on very short test clips of 10 seconds. But is this duration sufficient for Quality of Experience assessment? In this paper, we present the results of a comparative user study that tests whether quality perception and rating behavior may be different if video clip durations are longer. We did not find strong overall MOS differences between clip durations, but the three longer clips (60, 120 and 240 seconds) were rated slightly more positively than the three shorter durations under comparison (10, 15 and 30 seconds). This difference was most apparent when high quality videos were presented. However, we did not find an interaction between content class and the duration effect itself. Furthermore, methodological implications of these results are discussed.
10秒QoE:短视频片段长度是否足以进行体验质量评估?
主观视频质量测试的标准方法是基于10秒的非常短的测试片段。但是这个持续时间是否足以进行体验质量评估?在本文中,我们提出了一项比较用户研究的结果,该研究测试了如果视频剪辑持续时间较长,质量感知和评级行为是否会有所不同。我们没有发现短片长度之间的总体MOS差异,但三个较长的短片(60、120和240秒)的评分略高于三个较短的短片(10、15和30秒)。这种差异在播放高质量视频时最为明显。然而,我们没有发现内容类和持续时间效应本身之间的交互作用。此外,还讨论了这些结果的方法学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信