Investigation of Microbial Safety and Correlations Between the Level of Sanitary Indicator Bacteria and the Detection Ratio of Pathogens in Agricultural Water

Injun Hwang, T. Lee, Daesoo Park, Eunsun Kim, Song-Yi Choi, Jeong-Eun Hyun, N. Rajalingam, Se-Ri Kim, M. Cho
{"title":"Investigation of Microbial Safety and Correlations Between the Level of Sanitary Indicator Bacteria and the Detection Ratio of Pathogens in Agricultural Water","authors":"Injun Hwang, T. Lee, Daesoo Park, Eunsun Kim, Song-Yi Choi, Jeong-Eun Hyun, N. Rajalingam, Se-Ri Kim, M. Cho","doi":"10.5338/kjea.2021.40.4.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Contaminated water was a major source of food-borne pathogens in various recent fresh producerelated outbreaks. This study was conducted to investigate the microbial contamination level and correlations between the level of sanitary indicator bacteria and the detection ratio of pathogens in agricultural water by logistic regression analysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Agricultural water was collected from 457 sites including surface water (n=300 sites) and groundwater (n=157 sites) in South Korea from 2018 to 2020. Sanitary indicator bacteria (total coliform, fecal coliform, and Escherichia coli) and food-borne pathogens (pathogenic E. coli, E. coli O157:H7, Salmonella spp., and Listeria monocytogenes) were analyzed. In surface water, the coliform, fecal coliform, and E. coli were 3.27±0.89 log CFU/100 mL, 1.90±1.19 log CFU/100 mL, and 1.39±1.26 log CFU/100 mL, respectively. For groundwater, three kinds of sanitary indicators ranged in the level from 0.09 0.57 log CFU/100 mL. Pathogenic E. coli, Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes were detected from 3%-site, 1.5%site, and 0.6%-site water samples, respectively. According to the results of correlations between the level of sanitary indicator bacteria and the detection ratio of pathogens by logistic regression analysis, the probability of pathogen detection increased individually by 1.45 and 1.34 times as each total coliform and E. coli concentration increased by 1 log CFU/100mL. The accuracy of the model was 70.4%, and sensitivity and specificity were 81.5% and 51.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION(S): The results indicate the need to manage the microbial risk of agricultural water to enhance the safety of fresh produce. In addition, logistic regression analysis is useful to analyze the correlation between the level of sanitary indicator bacteria and the detection ratio of pathogens in agricultural water.","PeriodicalId":17872,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5338/kjea.2021.40.4.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contaminated water was a major source of food-borne pathogens in various recent fresh producerelated outbreaks. This study was conducted to investigate the microbial contamination level and correlations between the level of sanitary indicator bacteria and the detection ratio of pathogens in agricultural water by logistic regression analysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Agricultural water was collected from 457 sites including surface water (n=300 sites) and groundwater (n=157 sites) in South Korea from 2018 to 2020. Sanitary indicator bacteria (total coliform, fecal coliform, and Escherichia coli) and food-borne pathogens (pathogenic E. coli, E. coli O157:H7, Salmonella spp., and Listeria monocytogenes) were analyzed. In surface water, the coliform, fecal coliform, and E. coli were 3.27±0.89 log CFU/100 mL, 1.90±1.19 log CFU/100 mL, and 1.39±1.26 log CFU/100 mL, respectively. For groundwater, three kinds of sanitary indicators ranged in the level from 0.09 0.57 log CFU/100 mL. Pathogenic E. coli, Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes were detected from 3%-site, 1.5%site, and 0.6%-site water samples, respectively. According to the results of correlations between the level of sanitary indicator bacteria and the detection ratio of pathogens by logistic regression analysis, the probability of pathogen detection increased individually by 1.45 and 1.34 times as each total coliform and E. coli concentration increased by 1 log CFU/100mL. The accuracy of the model was 70.4%, and sensitivity and specificity were 81.5% and 51.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION(S): The results indicate the need to manage the microbial risk of agricultural water to enhance the safety of fresh produce. In addition, logistic regression analysis is useful to analyze the correlation between the level of sanitary indicator bacteria and the detection ratio of pathogens in agricultural water.
农业用水微生物安全性及卫生指示菌水平与病原菌检出率的相关性研究
背景:在最近各种与生鲜农产品有关的暴发中,受污染的水是食源性病原体的主要来源。本研究采用logistic回归分析方法,探讨农业用水中微生物污染水平及卫生指示菌水平与病原菌检出率的相关性。方法与结果:2018 - 2020年,从韩国457个地点收集农业用水,包括地表水(n=300个)和地下水(n=157个)。对卫生指标菌(总大肠菌群、粪便大肠菌群和大肠杆菌)和食源性致病菌(致病性大肠杆菌、大肠杆菌O157:H7、沙门氏菌和单核增生李斯特菌)进行分析。在地表水中,大肠菌群、粪便大肠菌群和大肠杆菌分别为3.27±0.89 log CFU/100 mL、1.90±1.19 log CFU/100 mL和1.39±1.26 log CFU/100 mL。地下水中3种卫生指标在0.09 ~ 0.57 log CFU/100 mL之间,分别在3%、1.5%和0.6%的水样中检出致病性大肠杆菌、沙门氏菌和单核增生李斯特菌。通过logistic回归分析卫生指示菌水平与病原菌检出率的相关性结果显示,大肠菌群和大肠杆菌总浓度每增加1 log CFU/100mL,病原菌检出率分别提高1.45倍和1.34倍。该模型的准确率为70.4%,敏感性和特异性分别为81.5%和51.7%。结论:应加强农业用水微生物风险管理,提高生鲜农产品安全。此外,logistic回归分析可用于分析农业用水卫生指示菌水平与病原菌检出率之间的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信