Collaboration Within Drug Courts: A National Survey of Drug Court Professionals

IF 1.3 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Jacqueline G. van Wormer, Mia Abboud Holbrook, Ruibin Lu, Faith E. Lutze, Xiaohan Mei
{"title":"Collaboration Within Drug Courts: A National Survey of Drug Court Professionals","authors":"Jacqueline G. van Wormer, Mia Abboud Holbrook, Ruibin Lu, Faith E. Lutze, Xiaohan Mei","doi":"10.1080/24751979.2020.1744470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Collaboration across diverse agencies is a foundational attribute of drug courts. It requires individuals and agencies to build trust, share resources and power, as well as maintain consistent participation to produce positive criminal justice interested outcomes. As past criminal justice and social service research has shown, the requirement to collaborate can produce negative impacts when criminal justice professionals are conflicted and required to still carry out their traditional adverse roles and responsibilities. To date, no empirical research has systemically evaluated the advantages and drawbacks of participation in a collaborative environment in the drug court model, and what elements combine to create stronger collaborative outcomes. By using a national sample and set of validated measures of professional benefits and drawbacks, we found that certain variables, such as level of training, gender and propensity/interest towards collaboration were predictive of greater professional benefits. Structural Regression Analysis (SRA) and Monte Carlo Simulation were utilized in the current study, creating empirical support for internal and external validity of the scales.","PeriodicalId":41318,"journal":{"name":"Justice Evaluation Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Justice Evaluation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2020.1744470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Collaboration across diverse agencies is a foundational attribute of drug courts. It requires individuals and agencies to build trust, share resources and power, as well as maintain consistent participation to produce positive criminal justice interested outcomes. As past criminal justice and social service research has shown, the requirement to collaborate can produce negative impacts when criminal justice professionals are conflicted and required to still carry out their traditional adverse roles and responsibilities. To date, no empirical research has systemically evaluated the advantages and drawbacks of participation in a collaborative environment in the drug court model, and what elements combine to create stronger collaborative outcomes. By using a national sample and set of validated measures of professional benefits and drawbacks, we found that certain variables, such as level of training, gender and propensity/interest towards collaboration were predictive of greater professional benefits. Structural Regression Analysis (SRA) and Monte Carlo Simulation were utilized in the current study, creating empirical support for internal and external validity of the scales.
毒品法庭内的合作:毒品法庭专业人员的全国调查
不同机构之间的合作是毒品法庭的基本属性。它要求个人和机构建立信任,分享资源和权力,并保持一贯的参与,以产生积极的刑事司法相关结果。正如过去的刑事司法和社会服务研究所表明的那样,当刑事司法专业人员发生冲突并仍被要求履行其传统的不利角色和责任时,合作的要求可能产生负面影响。到目前为止,还没有实证研究系统地评估了在药物法庭模式中参与合作环境的利弊,以及哪些因素结合起来可以创造更强的合作结果。通过使用全国样本和一组有效的专业优势和劣势测量,我们发现某些变量,如培训水平、性别和对合作的倾向/兴趣,可以预测更大的专业优势。本研究采用结构回归分析(SRA)和蒙特卡罗模拟,为量表的内部效度和外部效度提供实证支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Justice Evaluation Journal
Justice Evaluation Journal CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信