Investigation of different communication strategies for a delivery robot: the positive effects of humanlike communication styles *

Pia S. C. Dautzenberg, G. Voß, Stefan Ladwig, Astrid M. Rosenthal-von der Pütten
{"title":"Investigation of different communication strategies for a delivery robot: the positive effects of humanlike communication styles *","authors":"Pia S. C. Dautzenberg, G. Voß, Stefan Ladwig, Astrid M. Rosenthal-von der Pütten","doi":"10.1109/RO-MAN50785.2021.9515547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses how robots should communicate with humans so that the interaction is successful and satisfying for the user. Specifically, within the present study, nine different communication strategies were examined for a service robot that provides transportation of goods by semi-automated following. The communication style (humanlike friendly, humanlike professional, machinelike) and modality (auditive male, auditive female, visual) of communication was varied and their influence on system evaluation regarding competence, warmth, discomfort, embodiment and preferences were investigated in an online study. The results of the study indicate that a humanlike communication is rated more competent, warmer, less discomforting, and is generally preferred. With regard to gender, no clear preferences or differences in evaluation were found. In terms of modality, a combination of auditive and visual interaction was favored. It should be noted that the data were collected online and verification of the results in situ is essential. Nevertheless, the results of this study provide intriguing implications on how to target HRI for the service robot examined.","PeriodicalId":6854,"journal":{"name":"2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","volume":"33 1","pages":"356-361"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN50785.2021.9515547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper addresses how robots should communicate with humans so that the interaction is successful and satisfying for the user. Specifically, within the present study, nine different communication strategies were examined for a service robot that provides transportation of goods by semi-automated following. The communication style (humanlike friendly, humanlike professional, machinelike) and modality (auditive male, auditive female, visual) of communication was varied and their influence on system evaluation regarding competence, warmth, discomfort, embodiment and preferences were investigated in an online study. The results of the study indicate that a humanlike communication is rated more competent, warmer, less discomforting, and is generally preferred. With regard to gender, no clear preferences or differences in evaluation were found. In terms of modality, a combination of auditive and visual interaction was favored. It should be noted that the data were collected online and verification of the results in situ is essential. Nevertheless, the results of this study provide intriguing implications on how to target HRI for the service robot examined.
送货机器人不同沟通策略的研究:类人沟通风格的积极影响*
本文讨论了机器人应该如何与人类进行交流,从而使交互成功并使用户满意。具体而言,在本研究中,研究了九种不同的通信策略,用于通过半自动跟随提供货物运输的服务机器人。通过在线研究,考察了不同沟通方式(类人友好、类人专业、类机器)和不同沟通方式(听男、听女、视觉)对系统评价能力、温暖、不适、体现和偏好的影响。研究结果表明,类似人类的交流方式被认为更有能力、更温暖、更少令人不安,而且通常更受欢迎。关于性别,在评价中没有发现明显的偏好或差异。在形式方面,听觉和视觉互动的结合受到青睐。应当指出的是,这些数据是在线收集的,在现场对结果进行核实至关重要。尽管如此,这项研究的结果为如何针对服务机器人的HRI提供了有趣的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信