Trans-oral approach and trans-cervical approach in resection of parapharyngeal space tumors: a comparative analysis

Xiumin Lu, Li Liu, J. Sang, H. Cao
{"title":"Trans-oral approach and trans-cervical approach in resection of parapharyngeal space tumors: a comparative analysis","authors":"Xiumin Lu, Li Liu, J. Sang, H. Cao","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-4756.2020.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the operative methods for benign tumors in parapharyngeal space. \n \n \nMethods \nThe clinical data from 48 patients with benign tumors in parapharyngeal space admitted to Otolaryngology Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from February 2013 to February 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent imaging examination before surgery. Thirty-two cases of parapharyngeal space tumors were resected by trans-cervical approach and 16 cases by trans-oral approach. The therapeutic effects of the two methods were compared. \n \n \nResults \nPathological results showed 20 cases (41.7%) of schwannoma, 17 cases (35.4%) of pleomorphic adenoma, 4 cases (8.3%) of neurofibroma, 4 cases (8.3%) of hemangioma and 3 cases (6.3%) of cyst. During hospitalization, 6 cases who were given trans-cervical approach surgery had complications, and 2 cases treated by trans-oral approach surgery had complications. Postoperative follow-up ranged from 10 to 62 months. Two cases treated by trans-oral approach recurred, and 3 cases treated by trans-cervical approach recurred. All of the 5 patients were cured by performing operation again. Statistical analysis showed that there was no significant difference in gender, age, length of hospital stay, incidence of complications during hospitalization or recurrence between the two surgery approaches (P>0.05); however, there was a significant difference in operation duration and intraoperative bleeding between the two approaches (P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nThe trans-oral approach is a better surgical method for tumors located in the anterior half of parapharyngeal space, while trans-cervical approach is recommended to neurogenic tumors located in the posterior half of parapharyngeal space. \n \n \nKey words: \nParapharyngeal space neoplasms; Trans-cervical approach; Trans-oral approach","PeriodicalId":9667,"journal":{"name":"Central Plains Medical Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"6-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Plains Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-4756.2020.03.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To investigate the operative methods for benign tumors in parapharyngeal space. Methods The clinical data from 48 patients with benign tumors in parapharyngeal space admitted to Otolaryngology Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from February 2013 to February 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent imaging examination before surgery. Thirty-two cases of parapharyngeal space tumors were resected by trans-cervical approach and 16 cases by trans-oral approach. The therapeutic effects of the two methods were compared. Results Pathological results showed 20 cases (41.7%) of schwannoma, 17 cases (35.4%) of pleomorphic adenoma, 4 cases (8.3%) of neurofibroma, 4 cases (8.3%) of hemangioma and 3 cases (6.3%) of cyst. During hospitalization, 6 cases who were given trans-cervical approach surgery had complications, and 2 cases treated by trans-oral approach surgery had complications. Postoperative follow-up ranged from 10 to 62 months. Two cases treated by trans-oral approach recurred, and 3 cases treated by trans-cervical approach recurred. All of the 5 patients were cured by performing operation again. Statistical analysis showed that there was no significant difference in gender, age, length of hospital stay, incidence of complications during hospitalization or recurrence between the two surgery approaches (P>0.05); however, there was a significant difference in operation duration and intraoperative bleeding between the two approaches (P<0.05). Conclusions The trans-oral approach is a better surgical method for tumors located in the anterior half of parapharyngeal space, while trans-cervical approach is recommended to neurogenic tumors located in the posterior half of parapharyngeal space. Key words: Parapharyngeal space neoplasms; Trans-cervical approach; Trans-oral approach
经口入路与经颈入路在咽旁间隙肿瘤切除术中的比较分析
目的探讨咽旁间隙良性肿瘤的手术治疗方法。方法回顾性分析郑州大学附属第一医院耳鼻喉科2013年2月至2018年2月收治的48例咽旁间隙良性肿瘤患者的临床资料。所有患者术前均行影像学检查。经颈入路切除咽旁间隙肿瘤32例,经口入路切除咽旁间隙肿瘤16例。比较两种方法的治疗效果。结果病理结果:神经鞘瘤20例(41.7%),多形性腺瘤17例(35.4%),神经纤维瘤4例(8.3%),血管瘤4例(8.3%),囊肿3例(6.3%)。住院期间,经颈入路手术6例出现并发症,经口腔入路手术2例出现并发症。术后随访10 ~ 62个月。经口入路2例复发,经颈入路3例复发。5例患者均经再次手术治愈。统计分析显示,两种手术入路在性别、年龄、住院时间、住院期间并发症发生率、复发率等方面差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);两种入路手术时间及术中出血量差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对于位于咽旁间隙前半部分的肿瘤,经口入路是较好的手术方式,而对于位于咽旁间隙后半部分的神经源性肿瘤,建议采用经颈入路。关键词:咽旁间隙肿瘤;Trans-cervical方法;Trans-oral方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信