Loneliness and its Predictors in Lithuania and the European Context

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 0 PHILOSOPHY
G. Rapolienė, Vaida Tretjakova
{"title":"Loneliness and its Predictors in Lithuania and the European Context","authors":"G. Rapolienė, Vaida Tretjakova","doi":"10.6001/fil-soc.v32i4.4623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Loneliness as a subjective consequence of social exclusion has a negative impact on both individual and public health, and impedes societal development. Even though Lithuania has one of the highest rates of loneliness among EU countries, it has not been closely studied. This paper presents for the first time the analysis of the prevalence and factors of loneliness in Lithuania, covering all age groups, and provides the European context. Data from the European Social Survey 7th Wave (2014) were analysed using binary logistic regression. Contrary to our expectations, (older) age is not a predictor of loneliness in Lithuania. Lonely people are more likely to be of other nationality than the majority and the main minorities (i.e. not Lithuanian, Russian or Polish); are less likely to live with a spouse or partner, but more likely to live with children in the same household; more often experience serious financial difficulties; have a history of financial instability in their childhood; tend to have poor subjective health. Not having a partner/spouse and lower economic status are well known risk factors of loneliness from previous international studies. In the context of European countries, the share of lonely people in Lithuania is about average and living without a spouse/partner is a common characteristic of loneliness across all countries. However, other factors of loneliness, such as financial difficulties (current and during childhood), living with children in the same household and poor subjective health appear to be more pronounced in Lithuania.","PeriodicalId":43648,"journal":{"name":"Filosofija-Sociologija","volume":"302 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofija-Sociologija","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.v32i4.4623","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Loneliness as a subjective consequence of social exclusion has a negative impact on both individual and public health, and impedes societal development. Even though Lithuania has one of the highest rates of loneliness among EU countries, it has not been closely studied. This paper presents for the first time the analysis of the prevalence and factors of loneliness in Lithuania, covering all age groups, and provides the European context. Data from the European Social Survey 7th Wave (2014) were analysed using binary logistic regression. Contrary to our expectations, (older) age is not a predictor of loneliness in Lithuania. Lonely people are more likely to be of other nationality than the majority and the main minorities (i.e. not Lithuanian, Russian or Polish); are less likely to live with a spouse or partner, but more likely to live with children in the same household; more often experience serious financial difficulties; have a history of financial instability in their childhood; tend to have poor subjective health. Not having a partner/spouse and lower economic status are well known risk factors of loneliness from previous international studies. In the context of European countries, the share of lonely people in Lithuania is about average and living without a spouse/partner is a common characteristic of loneliness across all countries. However, other factors of loneliness, such as financial difficulties (current and during childhood), living with children in the same household and poor subjective health appear to be more pronounced in Lithuania.
立陶宛和欧洲背景下的孤独及其预测因素
孤独作为社会排斥的主观后果,对个人和公众健康都有负面影响,并阻碍社会发展。尽管立陶宛是欧盟国家中孤独率最高的国家之一,但它并没有被仔细研究过。本文首次提出了立陶宛的流行和孤独因素的分析,涵盖所有年龄组,并提供了欧洲背景。来自欧洲社会调查第七波(2014)的数据使用二元逻辑回归进行分析。与我们的预期相反,在立陶宛,年龄并不是孤独的预测因素。孤独的人更有可能是其他国籍的,而不是大多数人和主要的少数民族(即不是立陶宛人、俄罗斯人或波兰人);不太可能与配偶或伴侣住在一起,但更可能与孩子住在同一个家庭;更经常经历严重的经济困难;在童年时期有经济不稳定的历史;主观健康倾向较差。从以往的国际研究来看,没有伴侣/配偶和较低的经济地位是众所周知的孤独风险因素。在欧洲国家的背景下,立陶宛孤独者的比例大约是平均水平,没有配偶/伴侣的生活是所有国家孤独的共同特征。然而,造成孤独的其他因素,如经济困难(现在和童年时期)、与子女住在同一个家庭以及主观健康状况不佳,在立陶宛似乎更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
33.30%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信