Experimental Evaluation of Irrigation Methods for Yield, Water Productivity, and Economics of Paddy-Wheat Cropping System under Conservation Agriculture

IF 2.4 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
{"title":"Experimental Evaluation of Irrigation Methods for Yield, Water Productivity, and Economics of Paddy-Wheat Cropping System under Conservation Agriculture","authors":"","doi":"10.52151/jae2023601.1799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Irrigation methods have critical role in increasing the water productivity and crop production under paddy-wheat cropping systems. An experiment was carried out at Ludhiana, Punjab, India, in a randomized block design with eight treatments on drip and flood irrigation systems under conventional and conservation agricultural practices. Under conservation agriculture practice, drip irrigation had six treatments with different combinations of dripline spacing × emitter spacing × dripline depth as 675 × 300 × 0 mm (T1 ), 450 × 400 × 0 mm (T2 ), 675 × 300 × 150 mm (T3 ), 450 × 400 × 150 mm (T4 ), 675 × 300 × 200 mm (T5 ), 450 × 400 × 200 mm (T6 ). The treatments on conventional flood irrigation method included crop cultivation under farmer’s practice (T7 ) and under conservation agriculture practice (T8 ). The treatment T4 recorded significantly higher grain yield of wheat (6.522 t.ha-1) and paddy (8.178 t.ha-1) and water productivity (3.73, 1.20 kg.m-3, respectively. In the root zone of both wheat and paddy crops, the drip irrigation systems recorded lowest soil moisture variation within 0-450 mm soil depth under treatment T4 (4.33% to 9.77%), while it was highest under T7 (10.38% to 40.41%). The treatment T4 also showed water saving of 55.3% over the conventional flood irrigation method under paddy-wheat cropping system. In economic terms, the treatment T4 performed better with a benefit-cost ratio of 3.15 under the condition that 95% subsidy is availed on cost of drip irrigation system.","PeriodicalId":48507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Engineering","volume":"193 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2023601.1799","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Irrigation methods have critical role in increasing the water productivity and crop production under paddy-wheat cropping systems. An experiment was carried out at Ludhiana, Punjab, India, in a randomized block design with eight treatments on drip and flood irrigation systems under conventional and conservation agricultural practices. Under conservation agriculture practice, drip irrigation had six treatments with different combinations of dripline spacing × emitter spacing × dripline depth as 675 × 300 × 0 mm (T1 ), 450 × 400 × 0 mm (T2 ), 675 × 300 × 150 mm (T3 ), 450 × 400 × 150 mm (T4 ), 675 × 300 × 200 mm (T5 ), 450 × 400 × 200 mm (T6 ). The treatments on conventional flood irrigation method included crop cultivation under farmer’s practice (T7 ) and under conservation agriculture practice (T8 ). The treatment T4 recorded significantly higher grain yield of wheat (6.522 t.ha-1) and paddy (8.178 t.ha-1) and water productivity (3.73, 1.20 kg.m-3, respectively. In the root zone of both wheat and paddy crops, the drip irrigation systems recorded lowest soil moisture variation within 0-450 mm soil depth under treatment T4 (4.33% to 9.77%), while it was highest under T7 (10.38% to 40.41%). The treatment T4 also showed water saving of 55.3% over the conventional flood irrigation method under paddy-wheat cropping system. In economic terms, the treatment T4 performed better with a benefit-cost ratio of 3.15 under the condition that 95% subsidy is availed on cost of drip irrigation system.
节水农业条件下稻田-小麦灌溉方式对产量、水分生产力和经济效益的试验评价
在水麦种植制度下,灌溉方式对提高水分生产力和作物产量起着至关重要的作用。在印度旁遮普省的卢迪亚纳进行了一项试验,采用随机分组设计,在常规和保护性农业实践下对滴灌和洪水灌溉系统进行了8种处理。在保护性农业实践中,滴灌有675 × 300 × 0 mm (T1)、450 × 400 × 0 mm (T2)、675 × 300 × 150 mm (T3)、450 × 400 × 150 mm (T4)、675 × 300 × 200 mm (T5)、450 × 400 × 200 mm (T6) 6个不同滴灌间距×灌水器间距×滴灌深度组合的处理。常规漫灌方式的处理包括农民实践(T7)和保护性农业实践(T8)。T4处理显著提高了小麦产量(6.522 t.ha-1)、水稻产量(8.178 t.ha-1)和水分生产力(3.73、1.20 kg)。分别m3。在小麦和水稻根系区,T4处理0 ~ 450 mm土壤水分变化最小(4.33% ~ 9.77%),T7处理最大(10.38% ~ 40.41%)。在水麦套作条件下,T4处理较常规漫灌节水55.3%。在经济效益方面,在滴灌系统成本补贴95%的情况下,T4处理效果更好,效益成本比为3.15。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Engineering
Journal of Agricultural Engineering AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agricultural Engineering (JAE) is the official journal of the Italian Society of Agricultural Engineering supported by University of Bologna, Italy. The subject matter covers a complete and interdisciplinary range of research in engineering for agriculture and biosystems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信