Tre note a Stazio, Tebaide 5 (64–70; 77–80; 81–84)

IF 0.1 3区历史学 0 CLASSICS

PHILOLOGUS Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1515/phil-2023-0105

Baruch Martínez Zepeda

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper will examine three textual problems in Statius’ Thebaid, book 5 (Hypsipyle’s narration of the massacre on Lemnos) that have not previously been discussed in appropriate detail. It will also try to contribute to the demonstration of the fact that, on several occasions, P (Parisinus lat. 8051, s. ix2/3) is not the best codex in the tradition and that we can easily accept the text of the majority of manuscripts.

查看原文本刊更多论文

本文将考察斯塔提乌斯的《底比斯记》第5卷中的三个文本问题(希西派尔对利姆诺斯岛大屠杀的叙述)，这些问题以前没有被适当详细地讨论过。它还将努力有助于证明这样一个事实，即在若干情况下，P(巴黎人迟了)。8051, s. ix2/3)不是传统上最好的抄本，我们可以很容易地接受大多数手稿的文本。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

PHILOLOGUS CLASSICS-

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Die Beiträge behandeln Probleme der griechischen und lateinischen Literatur, Geschichtsschreibung, Philosophie, Religionsgeschichte und Linguistik sowie ihrer Rezeption und der Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Ziel der Zeitschrift ist es, einen Beitrag zur Erhellung der geistigen Kultur der Antike und ihrer Wirkungsgeschichte zu leisten. "Philologus" is one of the oldest and most respected periodicals in the field of classical studies. Its articles investigate Greek and Roman literature, historiography, philosophy, history of religion, linguistics, and history of science. The journal contributes to reconstructing and understanding ancient intellectual culture and its lasting influence on European civilization.