Preparation of Extended-Release Theophylline for Gastric Tube Administration Significantly Impairs Gradual Resorption

PapieAA Adriana, Sramek Vladimir, Pesakova Edita, MatiAAakova Libuse, S. Pavel
{"title":"Preparation of Extended-Release Theophylline for Gastric Tube Administration Significantly Impairs Gradual Resorption","authors":"PapieAA Adriana, Sramek Vladimir, Pesakova Edita, MatiAAakova Libuse, S. Pavel","doi":"10.4172/2167-065X.1000175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Although Extended Release (ER) dosage forms are not suitable for administration via Nasogastric Tube (NGT), they are used in critically ill patients. The aim of this study is to compare pharmacokinetics of intact and crushed ER theophylline capsules and tablets. \nMethods: Open-label, randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups was conducted on 10 healthy volunteers. They were randomized into Theo plus® 300 (ER tablets) and Eupyllin CR N® 300 (capsules with ER pellets) group. Each group took the same drug orally twice-first prepared (for the NGT administration) by crushing and secondly as an intact dosage form. Theophylline serum levels were taken at baseline, 30 min, 60 min, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 9 h and 12 h after drug administration. maximum serum concentration (Cmax), time to reach Cmax (Tmax) and area under the serum concentration-time curves over 12 h (AUC12h) were calculated. Data are presented as mean ± SD. \nResults: Crushing increased Cmax in both Euphyllin (43.8 ± 6.5 vs. 26.5 ± 1.6 μmol/l; p<0.01) and Theoplus (45.2 ± 3.6 vs. 29.4 ± 4.8 μmol/l; p=0.013) groups. Tmax was significantly shorter after administration of crushed dosage forms in Euphyllin (0.9 ± 0.7 vs. 5.6 ± 0.9 h; p<0.001) and Theoplus (1.1 ± 0.5 vs. 9.6 ± 2.5 h; p<0.01) group. Concordantly, drug crushing augmented AUC12 h by 40% in both drugs. \nConclusion: Crushing destroyed ER properties of theophylline tablets and capsules and their pharmacokinetic profiles were comparable with immediate release forms.","PeriodicalId":10410,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Biopharmaceutics","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Biopharmaceutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-065X.1000175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Although Extended Release (ER) dosage forms are not suitable for administration via Nasogastric Tube (NGT), they are used in critically ill patients. The aim of this study is to compare pharmacokinetics of intact and crushed ER theophylline capsules and tablets. Methods: Open-label, randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups was conducted on 10 healthy volunteers. They were randomized into Theo plus® 300 (ER tablets) and Eupyllin CR N® 300 (capsules with ER pellets) group. Each group took the same drug orally twice-first prepared (for the NGT administration) by crushing and secondly as an intact dosage form. Theophylline serum levels were taken at baseline, 30 min, 60 min, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 9 h and 12 h after drug administration. maximum serum concentration (Cmax), time to reach Cmax (Tmax) and area under the serum concentration-time curves over 12 h (AUC12h) were calculated. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Results: Crushing increased Cmax in both Euphyllin (43.8 ± 6.5 vs. 26.5 ± 1.6 μmol/l; p<0.01) and Theoplus (45.2 ± 3.6 vs. 29.4 ± 4.8 μmol/l; p=0.013) groups. Tmax was significantly shorter after administration of crushed dosage forms in Euphyllin (0.9 ± 0.7 vs. 5.6 ± 0.9 h; p<0.001) and Theoplus (1.1 ± 0.5 vs. 9.6 ± 2.5 h; p<0.01) group. Concordantly, drug crushing augmented AUC12 h by 40% in both drugs. Conclusion: Crushing destroyed ER properties of theophylline tablets and capsules and their pharmacokinetic profiles were comparable with immediate release forms.
胃管给药缓释茶碱的制备显著损害逐渐吸收
背景:虽然缓释(ER)剂型不适合通过鼻胃管(NGT)给药,但它们用于危重患者。本研究的目的是比较完整的和粉碎的内质网茶碱胶囊和片剂的药代动力学。方法:对10名健康志愿者进行开放标签、随机对照、两组平行试验。随机分为Theo plus®300 (ER片剂)组和Eupyllin CR N®300 (ER胶囊)组。各组口服同一药物两次,第一次为NGT给药,第二次为完整剂型。分别于给药后基线、30 min、60 min、2 h、4 h、6 h、9 h、12 h测定血清茶碱水平。计算最大血药浓度(Cmax)、达到Cmax所需时间(Tmax)和12h血药-时间曲线下面积(AUC12h)。数据以mean±SD表示。结果:粉碎后两种物质的Cmax均升高(43.8±6.5 vs. 26.5±1.6 μmol/l);p<0.01)和Theoplus(45.2±3.6∶29.4±4.8 μmol/l);p = 0.013)。给药后的Tmax显著缩短(0.9±0.7 vs. 5.6±0.9 h);p<0.001)和Theoplus(1.1±0.5∶9.6±2.5;p < 0.01)。同时,药物粉碎使两种药物的AUC12 h增加了40%。结论:茶碱片剂和胶囊的粉碎破坏内质网性质与立即释放制剂的药动学特征相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信