Technic-economic analysis of pyrolysis to produce fuel oil

IF 0.3 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Tailane Hauschild, C. Bergmann, T. Basegio, L. Tarelho, Genyr Kappler
{"title":"Technic-economic analysis of pyrolysis to produce fuel oil","authors":"Tailane Hauschild, C. Bergmann, T. Basegio, L. Tarelho, Genyr Kappler","doi":"10.3895/rts.v18n53.15799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It was made a technic-economic analysis of the feasibility of implementing a pyrolysis plant for the production of fuel oil (FO) from plastic fractions of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW). The catalytic pyrolysis process is carried out in a fixed bed reactor with a capacity of 4 m³ loaded with crushed and dry plastic waste (volumetric mass of 500 kg/m³), which is heated at a rate of 2 °C/min until the reaction temperature reaches 270 and 350 °C. Then, the pyrolysis process is then maintained at the established temperature for 6 hours. The retention time of the pyrolysis gases is 90 minutes. Each batch operation cycle lasts an average of 9 hours. It was evaluated production of FO from different plastic fractions resulting from MSW sorting in a medium-sized municipality. In scenario 1 (reference scenario), 1.04 and 3.63 ton/day of plastics of the MSW (PSW) are sent to recycling and landfill, respectively. Three alternative scenarios were defined and analyzed to implement plastic pyrolysis: scenario 2, 3.63 ton/day, the fraction of non-recycled PSW is considered for processing by pyrolysis; scenario 3, it is considered the recycling of PET and PVC, and the remaining PSW represents 4.36 ton/day, and it is considered for processing by pyrolysis; scenario 4, it is maintained the 4.36 ton/day of PSW as valorized by pyrolysis, and it is assumed that an additional 0.64 ton/day of PSW comes from an external source. The FO production costs were estimated at 1.50, 1.29, and 1.13 R$/L, approximately 41%, 49%, and 56% lower than the FO sale price (2.55 R$/L), for scenarios 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Costs of production per unit of energy (GJ) in FO are between 40.88 and 29.67 R$/GJ. The Net Present Value (NPV) of the solution, considering scenarios 2 to 4, increased from R$ 6.72×10 6 to R$ 11.29×10 6 . The positive NPV for the scenarios 2 to 4 indicates the economic viability of the pyrolysis plant. The pyrolysis system would need to operate between three and four years to recover the invested capital. The costs of the municipality with the destination of MSW can be reduced in 54.75%, from 139.48 to 63.12 R$/ton MSW, between the reference scenario and scenario 4 .","PeriodicalId":41762,"journal":{"name":"Revista Tecnologia e Sociedade","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Tecnologia e Sociedade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3895/rts.v18n53.15799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It was made a technic-economic analysis of the feasibility of implementing a pyrolysis plant for the production of fuel oil (FO) from plastic fractions of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW). The catalytic pyrolysis process is carried out in a fixed bed reactor with a capacity of 4 m³ loaded with crushed and dry plastic waste (volumetric mass of 500 kg/m³), which is heated at a rate of 2 °C/min until the reaction temperature reaches 270 and 350 °C. Then, the pyrolysis process is then maintained at the established temperature for 6 hours. The retention time of the pyrolysis gases is 90 minutes. Each batch operation cycle lasts an average of 9 hours. It was evaluated production of FO from different plastic fractions resulting from MSW sorting in a medium-sized municipality. In scenario 1 (reference scenario), 1.04 and 3.63 ton/day of plastics of the MSW (PSW) are sent to recycling and landfill, respectively. Three alternative scenarios were defined and analyzed to implement plastic pyrolysis: scenario 2, 3.63 ton/day, the fraction of non-recycled PSW is considered for processing by pyrolysis; scenario 3, it is considered the recycling of PET and PVC, and the remaining PSW represents 4.36 ton/day, and it is considered for processing by pyrolysis; scenario 4, it is maintained the 4.36 ton/day of PSW as valorized by pyrolysis, and it is assumed that an additional 0.64 ton/day of PSW comes from an external source. The FO production costs were estimated at 1.50, 1.29, and 1.13 R$/L, approximately 41%, 49%, and 56% lower than the FO sale price (2.55 R$/L), for scenarios 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Costs of production per unit of energy (GJ) in FO are between 40.88 and 29.67 R$/GJ. The Net Present Value (NPV) of the solution, considering scenarios 2 to 4, increased from R$ 6.72×10 6 to R$ 11.29×10 6 . The positive NPV for the scenarios 2 to 4 indicates the economic viability of the pyrolysis plant. The pyrolysis system would need to operate between three and four years to recover the invested capital. The costs of the municipality with the destination of MSW can be reduced in 54.75%, from 139.48 to 63.12 R$/ton MSW, between the reference scenario and scenario 4 .
热解生产燃料油的技术经济分析
对利用城市生活垃圾塑料馏分建立热解装置生产燃料油的可行性进行了技术经济分析。催化热解过程在容量为4 m³的固定床反应器中进行,反应器内装载有破碎干燥的塑料废弃物(体积质量为500 kg/m³),以2℃/min的速率加热,直至反应温度达到270℃和350℃。然后,热解过程在既定温度下保持6小时。热解气体的滞留时间为90分钟。每批操作周期平均为9小时。评价了某中型城市生活垃圾分拣产生的不同塑料组分FO的生产情况。在方案一(参考方案)下,每天分别有1.04吨和3.63吨都市固体废物的塑料被送往循环再造和堆填。定义并分析了实现塑料热解的三种备选方案:方案2,3.63 t /d,考虑部分不可回收的PSW进行热解处理;方案3,考虑PET、PVC回收,剩余PSW为4.36吨/天,考虑热解处理;情景4,维持热解产生的4.36吨/天的PSW,并假设额外的0.64吨/天的PSW来自外部来源。在方案2、3和4中,FO的生产成本分别为1.50、1.29和1.13雷亚尔/升,分别比FO的销售价格(2.55雷亚尔/升)低41%、49%和56%。FO每单位能源(GJ)的生产成本在40.88至29.67雷亚尔/GJ之间。考虑到场景2到场景4,解决方案的净现值(NPV)从R$ 6.72×10 6增加到R$ 11.29×10 6。方案2至方案4的正净现值表明热解装置的经济可行性。热解系统需要运行三到四年才能收回投资。在参考情景和情景4之间,城市生活垃圾目的地的成本可以降低54.75%,从每吨城市生活垃圾139.48雷亚尔降至63.12雷亚尔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Tecnologia e Sociedade
Revista Tecnologia e Sociedade SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书