Perclose ProGlide devices simplified the removal of the femoral venous cannulas for the transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect: A single-center retrospective study

Xiaofeng Han, Xi Guo, Tie-zheng Li, Guangrui Liu
{"title":"Perclose ProGlide devices simplified the removal of the femoral venous cannulas for the transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect: A single-center retrospective study","authors":"Xiaofeng Han, Xi Guo, Tie-zheng Li, Guangrui Liu","doi":"10.4103/2589-9686.348221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness, feasibility, and security of the Perclose ProGlide device that was used to remove the femoral venous cannulas for the transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect (ASD). METHODS: A total of 145 cases were analyzed retrospectively, who performed transcatheter closure of ASD in our center from March 2019 to March 2021. Based on whether the Perclose ProGlide device was placed or not in the femoral vein, 48 patients were assigned to the Perclose group and 97 ones to the non-Perclose group. The data of general characteristics, femoral venous cannulas, and related puncture complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The data of general characteristics or femoral venous cannulas were not significantly different between the two groups, but the procedure duration of removing venous cannulas was shorter in the Perclose group (0.5 min [0.35, 0.70] vs. 5 min [3.6, 7.4], P < 0.001). The puncture procedure-related blood lose was not significantly different between the two groups (Hemoglobin reduction value: 0.10 [−0.47, 0.30] g/dL vs. 0.10 [−0.50, 0.30] g/dL, P = 0.905). In addition, other complications caused by the removal of venous cannulas, length of stay in the ward, puncture infection, reintervention, and so on were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The Perclose ProGlide device could simplify the removal of femoral venous cannulas for ASD transcatheter closure by decreasing procedure duration and time in bed. The efficiency, feasibility, and safety of Perclose ProGlide devices, which were used to remove venous cannulas, are good enough for their clinical application.","PeriodicalId":34849,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Investigation and Therapy","volume":"16 1","pages":"31 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Investigation and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2589-9686.348221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness, feasibility, and security of the Perclose ProGlide device that was used to remove the femoral venous cannulas for the transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect (ASD). METHODS: A total of 145 cases were analyzed retrospectively, who performed transcatheter closure of ASD in our center from March 2019 to March 2021. Based on whether the Perclose ProGlide device was placed or not in the femoral vein, 48 patients were assigned to the Perclose group and 97 ones to the non-Perclose group. The data of general characteristics, femoral venous cannulas, and related puncture complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The data of general characteristics or femoral venous cannulas were not significantly different between the two groups, but the procedure duration of removing venous cannulas was shorter in the Perclose group (0.5 min [0.35, 0.70] vs. 5 min [3.6, 7.4], P < 0.001). The puncture procedure-related blood lose was not significantly different between the two groups (Hemoglobin reduction value: 0.10 [−0.47, 0.30] g/dL vs. 0.10 [−0.50, 0.30] g/dL, P = 0.905). In addition, other complications caused by the removal of venous cannulas, length of stay in the ward, puncture infection, reintervention, and so on were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The Perclose ProGlide device could simplify the removal of femoral venous cannulas for ASD transcatheter closure by decreasing procedure duration and time in bed. The efficiency, feasibility, and safety of Perclose ProGlide devices, which were used to remove venous cannulas, are good enough for their clinical application.
Perclose ProGlide装置简化了经导管房间隔缺损闭合术中股静脉插管的取出:一项单中心回顾性研究
目的:本研究旨在评估Perclose ProGlide装置在房间隔缺损(ASD)经导管闭合术中取出股静脉套管的有效性、可行性和安全性。方法:回顾性分析2019年3月至2021年3月在我中心行ASD经导管闭合术的145例患者。根据Perclose ProGlide装置是否置入股静脉,将48例患者分为Perclose组,97例患者分为非Perclose组。比较两组患者的一般特征、股静脉插管情况及相关穿刺并发症。结果:两组患者股骨静脉插管一般特征数据无显著差异,但Perclose组取管时间较短(0.5 min [0.35, 0.70] vs. 5 min [3.6, 7.4], P < 0.001)。两组穿刺相关失血量差异无统计学意义(血红蛋白降低值:0.10[−0.47,0.30]g/dL vs. 0.10[−0.50,0.30]g/dL, P = 0.905)。此外,两组间因拔管、住院时间、穿刺感染、再干预等引起的其他并发症无显著差异。结论:Perclose ProGlide装置可减少手术时间和床上时间,简化ASD经导管闭合股骨静脉插管的取出。Perclose ProGlide装置用于清除静脉插管的有效性、可行性和安全性足以用于临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书