Perclose ProGlide devices simplified the removal of the femoral venous cannulas for the transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect: A single-center retrospective study
{"title":"Perclose ProGlide devices simplified the removal of the femoral venous cannulas for the transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect: A single-center retrospective study","authors":"Xiaofeng Han, Xi Guo, Tie-zheng Li, Guangrui Liu","doi":"10.4103/2589-9686.348221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness, feasibility, and security of the Perclose ProGlide device that was used to remove the femoral venous cannulas for the transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect (ASD). METHODS: A total of 145 cases were analyzed retrospectively, who performed transcatheter closure of ASD in our center from March 2019 to March 2021. Based on whether the Perclose ProGlide device was placed or not in the femoral vein, 48 patients were assigned to the Perclose group and 97 ones to the non-Perclose group. The data of general characteristics, femoral venous cannulas, and related puncture complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The data of general characteristics or femoral venous cannulas were not significantly different between the two groups, but the procedure duration of removing venous cannulas was shorter in the Perclose group (0.5 min [0.35, 0.70] vs. 5 min [3.6, 7.4], P < 0.001). The puncture procedure-related blood lose was not significantly different between the two groups (Hemoglobin reduction value: 0.10 [−0.47, 0.30] g/dL vs. 0.10 [−0.50, 0.30] g/dL, P = 0.905). In addition, other complications caused by the removal of venous cannulas, length of stay in the ward, puncture infection, reintervention, and so on were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The Perclose ProGlide device could simplify the removal of femoral venous cannulas for ASD transcatheter closure by decreasing procedure duration and time in bed. The efficiency, feasibility, and safety of Perclose ProGlide devices, which were used to remove venous cannulas, are good enough for their clinical application.","PeriodicalId":34849,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Investigation and Therapy","volume":"16 1","pages":"31 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Investigation and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2589-9686.348221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness, feasibility, and security of the Perclose ProGlide device that was used to remove the femoral venous cannulas for the transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect (ASD). METHODS: A total of 145 cases were analyzed retrospectively, who performed transcatheter closure of ASD in our center from March 2019 to March 2021. Based on whether the Perclose ProGlide device was placed or not in the femoral vein, 48 patients were assigned to the Perclose group and 97 ones to the non-Perclose group. The data of general characteristics, femoral venous cannulas, and related puncture complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The data of general characteristics or femoral venous cannulas were not significantly different between the two groups, but the procedure duration of removing venous cannulas was shorter in the Perclose group (0.5 min [0.35, 0.70] vs. 5 min [3.6, 7.4], P < 0.001). The puncture procedure-related blood lose was not significantly different between the two groups (Hemoglobin reduction value: 0.10 [−0.47, 0.30] g/dL vs. 0.10 [−0.50, 0.30] g/dL, P = 0.905). In addition, other complications caused by the removal of venous cannulas, length of stay in the ward, puncture infection, reintervention, and so on were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The Perclose ProGlide device could simplify the removal of femoral venous cannulas for ASD transcatheter closure by decreasing procedure duration and time in bed. The efficiency, feasibility, and safety of Perclose ProGlide devices, which were used to remove venous cannulas, are good enough for their clinical application.
目的:本研究旨在评估Perclose ProGlide装置在房间隔缺损(ASD)经导管闭合术中取出股静脉套管的有效性、可行性和安全性。方法:回顾性分析2019年3月至2021年3月在我中心行ASD经导管闭合术的145例患者。根据Perclose ProGlide装置是否置入股静脉,将48例患者分为Perclose组,97例患者分为非Perclose组。比较两组患者的一般特征、股静脉插管情况及相关穿刺并发症。结果:两组患者股骨静脉插管一般特征数据无显著差异,但Perclose组取管时间较短(0.5 min [0.35, 0.70] vs. 5 min [3.6, 7.4], P < 0.001)。两组穿刺相关失血量差异无统计学意义(血红蛋白降低值:0.10[−0.47,0.30]g/dL vs. 0.10[−0.50,0.30]g/dL, P = 0.905)。此外,两组间因拔管、住院时间、穿刺感染、再干预等引起的其他并发症无显著差异。结论:Perclose ProGlide装置可减少手术时间和床上时间,简化ASD经导管闭合股骨静脉插管的取出。Perclose ProGlide装置用于清除静脉插管的有效性、可行性和安全性足以用于临床应用。