Wisdom and Power in Averroes’ Commentary on Plato’s Republic

C. Colmo
{"title":"Wisdom and Power in Averroes’ Commentary on Plato’s Republic","authors":"C. Colmo","doi":"10.1353/tmr.2015.0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The union of wisdom and power in Plato’s Republic admittedly puts philosophy in the service of politics. Socrates can raise the question of whether such a service would even be just. That is to say, Plato’s understanding of theoretical or philosophical knowledge creates a tension or—perhaps—a disjunction between theory and practice. In his commentary on Plato’s Republic, Averroes turns the Aristotelian dictum that nature does nothing in vain into a tool with which to probe the vanity of a theoretical knowledge which is independent of human will and choice. Averroes is in search of a new understanding of theory grounded in the thought that it is human will and choice, not nature which, at their best, do nothing in vain.","PeriodicalId":85753,"journal":{"name":"The Maghreb review. Majallat al-Maghrib","volume":"28 5 1","pages":"308 - 318"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Maghreb review. Majallat al-Maghrib","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tmr.2015.0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:The union of wisdom and power in Plato’s Republic admittedly puts philosophy in the service of politics. Socrates can raise the question of whether such a service would even be just. That is to say, Plato’s understanding of theoretical or philosophical knowledge creates a tension or—perhaps—a disjunction between theory and practice. In his commentary on Plato’s Republic, Averroes turns the Aristotelian dictum that nature does nothing in vain into a tool with which to probe the vanity of a theoretical knowledge which is independent of human will and choice. Averroes is in search of a new understanding of theory grounded in the thought that it is human will and choice, not nature which, at their best, do nothing in vain.
《阿威罗伊评柏拉图的理想国》中的智慧与权力
摘要:柏拉图《理想国》中智慧与权力的结合,无疑是让哲学为政治服务。苏格拉底可以提出这样的服务是否公正的问题。也就是说,柏拉图对理论或哲学知识的理解,在理论与实践之间制造了一种张力,或者可能是一种脱节。在他对柏拉图的《理想国》的评论中,阿威罗伊把亚里士多德的名言“自然不会徒劳”变成了一种工具,用来探索独立于人类意志和选择的理论知识的虚荣性。阿威罗伊正在寻求一种对理论的新理解,这种理论的基础是这样一种思想,即是人类的意志和选择,而不是自然,尽其所能,不会徒劳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信