E. Nursanti, Sibut Sibut, Sudharsan Jayabalan, Fourry Handoko, Nindya Oktarina
{"title":"Comparing Between Production Scheduling Methods to Achieve Efficient Resource Utilization","authors":"E. Nursanti, Sibut Sibut, Sudharsan Jayabalan, Fourry Handoko, Nindya Oktarina","doi":"10.12962/j23546026.y2020i1.11362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"—High competition among industries nowadays, requires companies to improve their production services. The speed of production service time, with excellent quality, becomes part of the company’s competitive advantage. This study aims to compare several production scheduling methods which are commonly used, so that efficient resource utilization can be obtained. Production Scheduling Methods such as Make to Order, Dannenbring, Branch and Bound, Nawaz Enscore and Ham and Campbell Dudeck Smith were compared using one case of tire retreading production. There were two jobs: tire retreading for truck and bus. Each job, assigned to ten workstations following its production steps. The results were obtained that Dannenbring and Campbell Dudeck Smith gave the same best results with the smallest makespan value, equivalent to 48% efficiency.","PeriodicalId":14533,"journal":{"name":"IPTEK Journal of Proceedings Series","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IPTEK Journal of Proceedings Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2020i1.11362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
—High competition among industries nowadays, requires companies to improve their production services. The speed of production service time, with excellent quality, becomes part of the company’s competitive advantage. This study aims to compare several production scheduling methods which are commonly used, so that efficient resource utilization can be obtained. Production Scheduling Methods such as Make to Order, Dannenbring, Branch and Bound, Nawaz Enscore and Ham and Campbell Dudeck Smith were compared using one case of tire retreading production. There were two jobs: tire retreading for truck and bus. Each job, assigned to ten workstations following its production steps. The results were obtained that Dannenbring and Campbell Dudeck Smith gave the same best results with the smallest makespan value, equivalent to 48% efficiency.
当今行业竞争激烈,要求企业提高生产服务水平。生产服务时间快,质量过硬,成为公司竞争优势的一部分。本研究旨在比较几种常用的生产调度方法,以达到资源的高效利用。以轮胎翻新生产为例,对按订单生产、Dannenbring、Branch and Bound、Nawaz Enscore和Ham and Campbell Dudeck Smith等生产调度方法进行了比较。当时有两份工作:给卡车和公共汽车翻新轮胎。每个作业,按照其生产步骤分配给十个工作站。结果表明,Dannenbring和Campbell Dudeck Smith在最大完工时间最小的情况下给出了相同的最佳结果,相当于48%的效率。