Is Technical Analysis Still Profitable? Evidence from MSCI Indices, Cross-Validation and Discrete False Discovery Rate

G. Sermpinis, Arman Hassanniakalager, C. Stasinakis, I. Psaradellis
{"title":"Is Technical Analysis Still Profitable? Evidence from MSCI Indices, Cross-Validation and Discrete False Discovery Rate","authors":"G. Sermpinis, Arman Hassanniakalager, C. Stasinakis, I. Psaradellis","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3284621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate the performance of more than 21,000 technical trading rules on 12 categorical and country-specific markets over the 2004-2015 study period. For this purpose, we apply a discrete false discovery rate approach in more than 240,000 hypotheses and examine the profitability, persistence and robustness of technical analysis. In terms of our results, technical analysis has short-term value. A novel cross-validation exercise highlights the importance of frequent rebalancing and supports our findings. Financial stress seems to have a strong negative effect in technical analysis profitability for US markets and a strong positive effect for emerging and other advanced markets.","PeriodicalId":11800,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Stock Market Risk (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Stock Market Risk (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3284621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We investigate the performance of more than 21,000 technical trading rules on 12 categorical and country-specific markets over the 2004-2015 study period. For this purpose, we apply a discrete false discovery rate approach in more than 240,000 hypotheses and examine the profitability, persistence and robustness of technical analysis. In terms of our results, technical analysis has short-term value. A novel cross-validation exercise highlights the importance of frequent rebalancing and supports our findings. Financial stress seems to have a strong negative effect in technical analysis profitability for US markets and a strong positive effect for emerging and other advanced markets.
技术分析仍然有利可图吗?来自MSCI指数的证据、交叉验证和离散错误发现率
我们调查了2004-2015年研究期间12个分类和特定国家市场上超过21,000个技术交易规则的表现。为此,我们在超过240,000个假设中应用离散错误发现率方法,并检查技术分析的盈利能力,持久性和稳健性。就我们的结果而言,技术分析具有短期价值。一项新的交叉验证练习强调了频繁再平衡的重要性,并支持了我们的发现。金融压力似乎对美国市场的技术分析盈利能力有强烈的负面影响,对新兴市场和其他发达市场有强烈的积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信