Media and freedom: Basic issues

Divna Vuksanović
{"title":"Media and freedom: Basic issues","authors":"Divna Vuksanović","doi":"10.5937/cm17-40660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The text problematizes, from the perspective of media philosophy, the relationship between the philosophical concept of freedom and the possibility of practicing freedom today in the media. The concept of freedom is one of the central themes of all philosophy, while the media is a newer field of research in philosophical-critical thought. Freedom in the media, which we propose in our article, is understood as a self-evident phenomenon. It is mostly spoken of on the basis of segmented, bureaucratically articulated \"standards\" that are often reduced to numbers, that is, quantitative criteria. Modern media, which are primarily an industry (mainstream media, Internet, and social networks), and thus quantification, can also hardly contribute to any kind of human emancipation, since they unquestionably serve profit, i.e., large corporate systems. Moreover, they have recently been significantly infused with artificial intelligence, and social networks are the main training ground for its use. Therefore, it is absurd to expect emancipation through algorithms, which are increasingly used in modern media. It should also be emphasized that free journalism has been banished from the media scene, so to speak, if we exclude the few alternative media that are being systematically pushed out of the public sphere. After all, how can modern media be said to be working in the public interest (even for freedom), and Julian Assange, a symbol of the presentation of relevant facts in the global media space, has beenbimprisoned for a decade as a political prisoner or criminal, similar to many others, less known, like him?","PeriodicalId":53049,"journal":{"name":"CM Communication and Media","volume":"13 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CM Communication and Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/cm17-40660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The text problematizes, from the perspective of media philosophy, the relationship between the philosophical concept of freedom and the possibility of practicing freedom today in the media. The concept of freedom is one of the central themes of all philosophy, while the media is a newer field of research in philosophical-critical thought. Freedom in the media, which we propose in our article, is understood as a self-evident phenomenon. It is mostly spoken of on the basis of segmented, bureaucratically articulated "standards" that are often reduced to numbers, that is, quantitative criteria. Modern media, which are primarily an industry (mainstream media, Internet, and social networks), and thus quantification, can also hardly contribute to any kind of human emancipation, since they unquestionably serve profit, i.e., large corporate systems. Moreover, they have recently been significantly infused with artificial intelligence, and social networks are the main training ground for its use. Therefore, it is absurd to expect emancipation through algorithms, which are increasingly used in modern media. It should also be emphasized that free journalism has been banished from the media scene, so to speak, if we exclude the few alternative media that are being systematically pushed out of the public sphere. After all, how can modern media be said to be working in the public interest (even for freedom), and Julian Assange, a symbol of the presentation of relevant facts in the global media space, has beenbimprisoned for a decade as a political prisoner or criminal, similar to many others, less known, like him?
媒体与自由:基本问题
本文从媒介哲学的角度,对自由的哲学概念与今天在媒介中实践自由的可能性之间的关系提出了质疑。自由的概念是所有哲学的中心主题之一,而媒体是哲学批判思想的一个较新的研究领域。我们在文章中提出的媒体自由被理解为一种不言而喻的现象。它主要是在分割的、官僚主义的“标准”的基础上讲的,这些标准通常被简化为数字,即定量标准。现代媒体主要是一种产业(主流媒体、互联网和社交网络),因此是量化的,也几乎不能为任何形式的人类解放做出贡献,因为它们无疑是为利润服务的,即为大型企业系统服务。此外,它们最近被大量注入了人工智能,而社交网络是人工智能应用的主要训练基地。因此,期望通过在现代媒体中越来越多地使用的算法来解放是荒谬的。还应该强调的是,如果我们排除正在被系统地挤出公共领域的少数替代媒体,那么可以说,自由新闻已经被排除在媒体领域之外。毕竟,现代媒体怎么能被说成是为公众利益而工作(甚至是为了自由),而朱利安·阿桑奇,一个在全球媒体空间中展示相关事实的象征,已经作为政治犯或罪犯被监禁了十年,就像许多其他人一样,不太为人所知,就像他一样?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信