Estimation of Low-Velocity Landfill Thickness with Multi-Method Seismic Surveys

IF 2.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Yaniv Darvasi, A. Agnon
{"title":"Estimation of Low-Velocity Landfill Thickness with Multi-Method Seismic Surveys","authors":"Yaniv Darvasi, A. Agnon","doi":"10.3390/geotechnics3030040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventional geophysical methods are suitable for estimating the thicknesses of subsoil layers. By combining several geophysical methods, the uncertainties can be assessed. Hence, the reliability of the results increases with a more accurate engineering solution. To estimate the base of an abandoned landfill, we collected data using classical approaches: high-resolution seismic reflection and refraction, with more modern methods including passive surface wave analysis and horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) measurements. To evaluate the thickness of the landfill, three different datasets were acquired along each of the two seismic lines, and five different processing methods were applied for each of the two arrays. The results of all the classical methods indicate very consistent correlations and mostly converge to clear outcomes. However, since the shear wave velocity of the landfill is relatively low (<150 (m/s)), the uncertainty of the HVSR results is significant. All these methods are engineering-oriented, environmentally friendly, and relatively low-cost. They may be jointly interpreted to better assess uncertainties and therefore enable an efficient solution for environmental or engineering purposes.","PeriodicalId":11823,"journal":{"name":"Environmental geotechnics","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geotechnics3030040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conventional geophysical methods are suitable for estimating the thicknesses of subsoil layers. By combining several geophysical methods, the uncertainties can be assessed. Hence, the reliability of the results increases with a more accurate engineering solution. To estimate the base of an abandoned landfill, we collected data using classical approaches: high-resolution seismic reflection and refraction, with more modern methods including passive surface wave analysis and horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) measurements. To evaluate the thickness of the landfill, three different datasets were acquired along each of the two seismic lines, and five different processing methods were applied for each of the two arrays. The results of all the classical methods indicate very consistent correlations and mostly converge to clear outcomes. However, since the shear wave velocity of the landfill is relatively low (<150 (m/s)), the uncertainty of the HVSR results is significant. All these methods are engineering-oriented, environmentally friendly, and relatively low-cost. They may be jointly interpreted to better assess uncertainties and therefore enable an efficient solution for environmental or engineering purposes.
用多方法地震测量估算低速填埋厚度
常规地球物理方法适用于估算地下土层厚度。通过结合几种地球物理方法,可以评估不确定性。因此,结果的可靠性随着更精确的工程解决方案的增加而增加。为了估计废弃垃圾填埋场的地基,我们使用经典方法收集数据:高分辨率地震反射和折射,以及更现代的方法,包括被动表面波分析和水平-垂直光谱比(HVSR)测量。为了评估垃圾填埋场的厚度,沿着两条地震线分别获取了三个不同的数据集,并对两条地震线分别应用了五种不同的处理方法。所有经典方法的结果都表明非常一致的相关性,并且大多收敛到明确的结果。然而,由于垃圾填埋场的横波速度相对较低(<150 (m/s)),因此HVSR结果的不确定性很大。所有这些方法都是工程化的、环保的、相对低成本的。它们可以共同解释,以更好地评估不确定性,从而为环境或工程目的提供有效的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental geotechnics
Environmental geotechnics Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
18.20%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: In 21st century living, engineers and researchers need to deal with growing problems related to climate change, oil and water storage, handling, storage and disposal of toxic and hazardous wastes, remediation of contaminated sites, sustainable development and energy derived from the ground. Environmental Geotechnics aims to disseminate knowledge and provides a fresh perspective regarding the basic concepts, theory, techniques and field applicability of innovative testing and analysis methodologies and engineering practices in geoenvironmental engineering. The journal''s Editor in Chief is a Member of the Committee on Publication Ethics. All relevant papers are carefully considered, vetted by a distinguished team of international experts and rapidly published. Full research papers, short communications and comprehensive review articles are published under the following broad subject categories: geochemistry and geohydrology, soil and rock physics, biological processes in soil, soil-atmosphere interaction, electrical, electromagnetic and thermal characteristics of porous media, waste management, utilization of wastes, multiphase science, landslide wasting, soil and water conservation, sensor development and applications, the impact of climatic changes on geoenvironmental, geothermal/ground-source energy, carbon sequestration, oil and gas extraction techniques, uncertainty, reliability and risk, monitoring and forensic geotechnics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信