Beef Cattle Fattening Practices and Marketing Systems in Gondar Town, Amhara, Ethiopia

Q4 Veterinary
Habtamu Ayalew, Genzeb Tamru, D. Abebe
{"title":"Beef Cattle Fattening Practices and Marketing Systems in Gondar Town, Amhara, Ethiopia","authors":"Habtamu Ayalew, Genzeb Tamru, D. Abebe","doi":"10.4172/2157-7579.1000555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the study was to describe the cattle fattening practices and the existing marketing systems. For this study, four farmer associations were selected on purpose. From each PA, 20 respondents (a total of 80 HH) were randomly selected from owners who practice fattening cattle and the data was collected using a semi-structured questionnaire and observation. The collected data were analyzed by using SPSS version 20 software.In the study area, the food resources used for their fattening cattle were 67.5%, 17.5% and 15.0% of wheat and corn bran, bean and rice bran and the mixture of bean + peacoat + hay as feed for their fattening cattle without scientific formulation, respectively. The sources of water used by respondents were 72.5% and 27.5%, respectively, for river and strip water. The finding revealed that majority of fatteners was select cattle based on phenotypic characteristics of the cattle by body frame (58.8%), glossy coat color (31.2%), wide/deep body condition (7.5%) and thick neck (2.5%). The survey result indicated 65.0% and 35.0% of respondents used trekking and vehicle (trucking) transporting practices, respectively. Even though, weight measurements had not practiced in the area, 87.5% respondents price set factor were depending on live weight of animals. The current study showed that the main constraints of beef cattle fattening practices in Gondar town were feed cost increase (30.0%), lack of credit (12.5%) and absence of market information (16.2%).In general, the fattening practices of beef cattle in the study area were constrained by various challenges and not supported by improved fattening technology. In order to increase the profitability of feeders, the provision to farmers of adequate training and extension services on improved livestock fattening technologies, key management practices and market information should be mandatory. In Ethiopia both farming and pastoral household's largely dependent on livestock for their livelihood system. Livestock have diverse function in the live hold systems of Ethiopia farmers in the various farming system and serves as a source of food, traction, manure, row materials, cash income foreign exchange earning social and culture identity. In terms of contribution to national economy, livestock contribute about 16.5% of the Gross domestic product (GDP) and 35.6% of the agriculture GDP and currently the subsector supports and sustains livelihoods for 80% of rural population . Cattle fattening is one of the newly incipient activity. The sector is an emerging for employment and income generation for urban and pre-urban dweller, particularly, for those vacant farmers due to urbanization and cattle fattening association organized at small scale micro finance level. Cattle fattening is an effective tool for poverty reduction and simultaneously becomes an important commercial sector, attention must focus on small livestock feeders as well as the private sector as engines of economic vitality. In Ethiopia, governmental and non-governmental organizations are currently promoting the emergence of small farms as well as commercial fattening operations and sector support establishments in cooperative or private form. However, there is little information on their constraints, opportunities, challenges, economic efficiency, production potential and performance of beef cattle in this sector. Beef cattle are one of a few agriculture commodities in Ethiopia for which the country earn foreign currency through both live and process forms of the commodity exports and also most of rural poor are engaged in rearing it to fulfill their daily needs and economy gaps. Though, the town is characterized as huge number of indigenous Fogera cattle population, meat demand and the presence of large abattoir owners are not getting enough benefit from there fattening activities. Moreover, there might be a number of challenges which limits profitability of beef cattle fattening systems in the area. So, conducting research and raising appropriate improvement strategies of cattle fattening have to be mandatory. References 1. Ehuni S, Li PH, Mares V, Shapiro BI (1998) The Role of Livestock in Food Security and Environmental Protection. Outlook in Agriculture 27: 81-87. 2. Belete A, Azage T, Fikadu B, Berhanu G (2010) Cattle milk and meat production and marketing systems and opportunities for market orientation in Fogera woreda, Amhara region, Ethiopia. IPMS (Improved productivity and market success) of Ethiopia farmers project working paper 19. ILSRI (International Livestock research Institute), Nairobi, Kenya, p: 65. 3. Metafaria F, Cherent T, Abenet F, Ali J, Guliant W (2011) Review to improve estimation of livestock contribution to the national GDP. Ministry of Finance and Economic Development and Ministry of Agriculture. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 4. Bezahegn A (2014) Small Scale Beef Cattle Fattening Practices on farm Performance Evaluation and Opportunities for Market Orientation in Western Hararghe Zone, Chiro District. Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia. E-mail: habtish.ayu@gmail.com This work is partly presented at Veterinary Surgeons and Veterinary Medicine Congress, October 02-04, 2017 Philadelphia, USA Research and Reviews: Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Allied Science Extended Abstract","PeriodicalId":36826,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7579.1000555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The objective of the study was to describe the cattle fattening practices and the existing marketing systems. For this study, four farmer associations were selected on purpose. From each PA, 20 respondents (a total of 80 HH) were randomly selected from owners who practice fattening cattle and the data was collected using a semi-structured questionnaire and observation. The collected data were analyzed by using SPSS version 20 software.In the study area, the food resources used for their fattening cattle were 67.5%, 17.5% and 15.0% of wheat and corn bran, bean and rice bran and the mixture of bean + peacoat + hay as feed for their fattening cattle without scientific formulation, respectively. The sources of water used by respondents were 72.5% and 27.5%, respectively, for river and strip water. The finding revealed that majority of fatteners was select cattle based on phenotypic characteristics of the cattle by body frame (58.8%), glossy coat color (31.2%), wide/deep body condition (7.5%) and thick neck (2.5%). The survey result indicated 65.0% and 35.0% of respondents used trekking and vehicle (trucking) transporting practices, respectively. Even though, weight measurements had not practiced in the area, 87.5% respondents price set factor were depending on live weight of animals. The current study showed that the main constraints of beef cattle fattening practices in Gondar town were feed cost increase (30.0%), lack of credit (12.5%) and absence of market information (16.2%).In general, the fattening practices of beef cattle in the study area were constrained by various challenges and not supported by improved fattening technology. In order to increase the profitability of feeders, the provision to farmers of adequate training and extension services on improved livestock fattening technologies, key management practices and market information should be mandatory. In Ethiopia both farming and pastoral household's largely dependent on livestock for their livelihood system. Livestock have diverse function in the live hold systems of Ethiopia farmers in the various farming system and serves as a source of food, traction, manure, row materials, cash income foreign exchange earning social and culture identity. In terms of contribution to national economy, livestock contribute about 16.5% of the Gross domestic product (GDP) and 35.6% of the agriculture GDP and currently the subsector supports and sustains livelihoods for 80% of rural population . Cattle fattening is one of the newly incipient activity. The sector is an emerging for employment and income generation for urban and pre-urban dweller, particularly, for those vacant farmers due to urbanization and cattle fattening association organized at small scale micro finance level. Cattle fattening is an effective tool for poverty reduction and simultaneously becomes an important commercial sector, attention must focus on small livestock feeders as well as the private sector as engines of economic vitality. In Ethiopia, governmental and non-governmental organizations are currently promoting the emergence of small farms as well as commercial fattening operations and sector support establishments in cooperative or private form. However, there is little information on their constraints, opportunities, challenges, economic efficiency, production potential and performance of beef cattle in this sector. Beef cattle are one of a few agriculture commodities in Ethiopia for which the country earn foreign currency through both live and process forms of the commodity exports and also most of rural poor are engaged in rearing it to fulfill their daily needs and economy gaps. Though, the town is characterized as huge number of indigenous Fogera cattle population, meat demand and the presence of large abattoir owners are not getting enough benefit from there fattening activities. Moreover, there might be a number of challenges which limits profitability of beef cattle fattening systems in the area. So, conducting research and raising appropriate improvement strategies of cattle fattening have to be mandatory. References 1. Ehuni S, Li PH, Mares V, Shapiro BI (1998) The Role of Livestock in Food Security and Environmental Protection. Outlook in Agriculture 27: 81-87. 2. Belete A, Azage T, Fikadu B, Berhanu G (2010) Cattle milk and meat production and marketing systems and opportunities for market orientation in Fogera woreda, Amhara region, Ethiopia. IPMS (Improved productivity and market success) of Ethiopia farmers project working paper 19. ILSRI (International Livestock research Institute), Nairobi, Kenya, p: 65. 3. Metafaria F, Cherent T, Abenet F, Ali J, Guliant W (2011) Review to improve estimation of livestock contribution to the national GDP. Ministry of Finance and Economic Development and Ministry of Agriculture. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 4. Bezahegn A (2014) Small Scale Beef Cattle Fattening Practices on farm Performance Evaluation and Opportunities for Market Orientation in Western Hararghe Zone, Chiro District. Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia. E-mail: habtish.ayu@gmail.com This work is partly presented at Veterinary Surgeons and Veterinary Medicine Congress, October 02-04, 2017 Philadelphia, USA Research and Reviews: Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Allied Science Extended Abstract
埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉贡达尔镇肉牛育肥做法和营销系统
本研究的目的是描述牛的育肥做法和现有的营销系统。在本研究中,我们有意选择了四个农民协会。从每个牧场主中随机抽取20名受访者(共80名牧场主),采用半结构化问卷和观察法收集数据。采用SPSS 20软件对收集的数据进行分析。研究区育肥牛的饲料资源分别为:小麦玉米皮、大豆米糠、大豆+羊毛+干草的混合物为67.5%、17.5%和15.0%,没有科学配方。被调查者使用的水源分别为72.5%和27.5%,为河流和地带水。结果表明,大多数肥育者是根据牛的表型特征选择牛的,包括体框(58.8%)、有光泽的毛色(31.2%)、体宽/深(7.5%)和粗颈(2.5%)。调查结果显示,65.0%和35.0%的受访者分别采用徒步和车辆(卡车)运输方式。尽管该地区没有实行体重测量,但87.5%的受访者的价格设定因素取决于动物的活重。目前的研究表明,贡达尔镇肉牛育肥实践的主要制约因素是饲料成本增加(30.0%)、缺乏信贷(12.5%)和缺乏市场信息(16.2%)。总的来说,研究区肉牛的育肥实践受到各种挑战的制约,并且没有改进的育肥技术支持。为了提高饲养者的盈利能力,必须向农民提供有关改良牲畜育肥技术、关键管理做法和市场信息的充分培训和推广服务。在埃塞俄比亚,农牧民家庭在很大程度上依靠牲畜维持生计。牲畜在埃塞俄比亚农民的各种耕作系统中具有多种功能,是食物、牵引、粪便、种植材料、现金收入、外汇收入和社会文化身份的来源。就对国民经济的贡献而言,畜牧业贡献了约16.5%的国内生产总值和35.6%的农业国内生产总值,目前该分部门支持和维持了80%的农村人口的生计。养牛是新近开始的一项活动。该部门是一个新兴部门,为城市和城市前居民提供就业和创收,特别是为那些因城市化和在小规模微型金融一级组织的养牛协会而空缺的农民。养牛是减少贫困的有效工具,同时也成为一个重要的商业部门,必须重视小型牲畜饲养者以及私营部门作为经济活力的引擎。在埃塞俄比亚,政府和非政府组织目前正在促进小型农场的出现以及商业育肥业务和合作社或私营形式的部门支助机构。然而,关于肉牛在这一领域的制约因素、机遇、挑战、经济效率、生产潜力和性能的信息却很少。肉牛是埃塞俄比亚为数不多的农业商品之一,该国通过商品出口的活的和加工的形式赚取外汇,而且大多数农村穷人都从事饲养肉牛,以满足他们的日常需求和经济差距。虽然该镇的特点是拥有大量的土著福格拉牛,但肉类需求和大型屠宰场所有者的存在并没有从他们的育肥活动中获得足够的利益。此外,可能存在一些限制该地区肉牛育肥系统盈利能力的挑战。因此,开展奶牛肥育研究和提出适宜的肥育改良策略势在必行。引用1。李文华,李文华,毕夏皮(1998)粮食安全与环境保护中牲畜的作用。农业展望,27,81-87。2. Belete A, Azage T, Fikadu B, Berhanu G(2010)埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉地区Fogera woreda的牛乳和肉类生产和销售系统及市场导向机会。埃塞俄比亚农民IPMS(提高生产力和市场成功)项目工作文件19。国际畜牧研究所,肯尼亚内罗毕,第65页。3.Metafaria F, Cherent T, Abenet F, Ali J, Guliant W(2011)改进畜牧业对国民生产总值贡献估算的综述。财政和经济发展部和农业部。亚的斯亚贝巴,埃塞俄比亚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信