Comparison of Saphenous Nerve Block and Oral Oxycodone for Postoperative Pain Management in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IF 0.2 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Naderali Nazemyanyazdi, A. Delavari, Masood Saghafinia, M. Emami
{"title":"Comparison of Saphenous Nerve Block and Oral Oxycodone for Postoperative Pain Management in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial","authors":"Naderali Nazemyanyazdi, A. Delavari, Masood Saghafinia, M. Emami","doi":"10.30491/TM.2021.283199.1283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Post-operative pain management following total knee replacement (TKA) is very crucial. There is a need to introduce some available, inexpensive, and effective methods for postoperative pain management. This randomized clinical trial was done for comparing the analgesic effect of an oral inexpensive drug (oxycodone) and saphenous nerve blocko study the better method for postoperative pain management after TKA surgery.Methods: This single-blind, randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trial was performed in Baghiatallah Hospital from June 2017 to June 2018. Eighty patients were included for TKA randomly divided into two groups. Group A received a single shot ultrasound-guided saphenous nerve block and group B had an oral intake of oxycodone started before and continued every 6 hours after surgery to control post-operative pain. The pain score by visual analog scale (VAS), nausea- vomiting and diclofenac consumption were assessed postoperatively at 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours post-spinal anesthesia administration. Data were analyzed by SPSS-21 and Chi2, Fishers' exact test, and Mann-Whitney were used for comparing data between the two groups. Result: The pain intensity according to the visual analog scale at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h post-operative was 1.25±1.37, 4.12±1.11, 5.25±0.89, and 4.57±095 in group A and 1.10±0.953.77±0.99, 4.05±0.78, and 2.95±0.78 in the group B respectively that was significantly lower in the group B at 12 and 24 hours (p <0.05). The mean diclofenac use was 87.01±68.02 mg in group B and 262.04±92.05 mg in the group A (p <0.001). Also, the incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly higher in group B compared to the other group (p <0.001). Conclusion: Oral oxycodone can control post-operative pain better than saphenous nerve block in the management of postoperative relief and reducing total additional analgesic drugs consumption. But, adverse effects such as nausea and vomiting were lower in saphenous nerve block than oral oxycodone.","PeriodicalId":23249,"journal":{"name":"Trauma monthly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma monthly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30491/TM.2021.283199.1283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Post-operative pain management following total knee replacement (TKA) is very crucial. There is a need to introduce some available, inexpensive, and effective methods for postoperative pain management. This randomized clinical trial was done for comparing the analgesic effect of an oral inexpensive drug (oxycodone) and saphenous nerve blocko study the better method for postoperative pain management after TKA surgery.Methods: This single-blind, randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trial was performed in Baghiatallah Hospital from June 2017 to June 2018. Eighty patients were included for TKA randomly divided into two groups. Group A received a single shot ultrasound-guided saphenous nerve block and group B had an oral intake of oxycodone started before and continued every 6 hours after surgery to control post-operative pain. The pain score by visual analog scale (VAS), nausea- vomiting and diclofenac consumption were assessed postoperatively at 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours post-spinal anesthesia administration. Data were analyzed by SPSS-21 and Chi2, Fishers' exact test, and Mann-Whitney were used for comparing data between the two groups. Result: The pain intensity according to the visual analog scale at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h post-operative was 1.25±1.37, 4.12±1.11, 5.25±0.89, and 4.57±095 in group A and 1.10±0.953.77±0.99, 4.05±0.78, and 2.95±0.78 in the group B respectively that was significantly lower in the group B at 12 and 24 hours (p <0.05). The mean diclofenac use was 87.01±68.02 mg in group B and 262.04±92.05 mg in the group A (p <0.001). Also, the incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly higher in group B compared to the other group (p <0.001). Conclusion: Oral oxycodone can control post-operative pain better than saphenous nerve block in the management of postoperative relief and reducing total additional analgesic drugs consumption. But, adverse effects such as nausea and vomiting were lower in saphenous nerve block than oral oxycodone.
全膝关节置换术中隐神经阻滞与口服羟考酮治疗术后疼痛的比较:一项随机临床试验
背景:全膝关节置换术(TKA)术后疼痛管理至关重要。有必要引入一些可用的、廉价的、有效的方法来处理术后疼痛。本随机临床试验旨在比较口服廉价药物(羟考酮)和隐神经阻滞治疗TKA术后疼痛的效果。方法:于2017年6月至2018年6月在Baghiatallah医院进行单盲、随机、对照、单中心临床试验。80例TKA患者随机分为两组。A组患者行超声引导下单次隐神经阻滞,B组患者术前开始口服羟考酮,术后每6小时口服一次,以控制术后疼痛。分别于脊髓麻醉后2、6、12、24小时用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估疼痛评分、恶心呕吐和双氯芬酸用量。数据分析采用SPSS-21和Chi2, fisher精确检验,两组数据比较采用Mann-Whitney检验。结果:A组术后2、6、12、24 h视觉模拟量表疼痛强度分别为1.25±1.37、4.12±1.11、5.25±0.89、4.57±095,B组术后12、24 h疼痛强度分别为1.10±0.953.77±0.99、4.05±0.78、2.95±0.78,B组术后12、24 h疼痛强度明显低于B组(p <0.05)。B组平均双氯芬酸用量为87.01±68.02 mg, A组平均双氯芬酸用量为262.04±92.05 mg (p <0.001)。此外,B组恶心和呕吐的发生率明显高于另一组(p <0.001)。结论:口服羟考酮对术后疼痛的控制效果优于隐神经阻滞,可减少术后附加镇痛药物的总用量。但是,与口服羟考酮相比,隐神经阻滞组的恶心和呕吐等不良反应较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trauma monthly
Trauma monthly EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信