Supply-side review of the UK specialist housing market and why it is failing older people

IF 0.8 Q3 URBAN STUDIES
Andrew J. E. Harding, J. Parker, S. Hean, A. Hemingway
{"title":"Supply-side review of the UK specialist housing market and why it is failing older people","authors":"Andrew J. E. Harding, J. Parker, S. Hean, A. Hemingway","doi":"10.1108/HCS-05-2018-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to provide a supply-side review of policies and practices that impact on the shortage of supply in the contemporary specialist housing market for older people in the UK.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe review is based on a review of academic literature, policy documents, reports and other sources.\n\n\nFindings\nThere is a critical conflict between the key social purpose of specialist housing (i.e. living independent of socially provided care) and the values that underpin and ultimately limit the quantity of units in both the social and private sector. In the social sector, government policies prohibit rather than encourage local authorities and housing associations from increasing specialist housing stock. The nature of leasehold tenures in the private sector tends to commodify not only housing stock but also those who use it and therefore acts to instrumentalise housing supply in favour of the profit motive and the focus on the person and her or his needs is largely ignored.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nWhile the shortage of specialist housing is well known, this paper is unique in that it provides a comprehensive and critical supply-side review of the factors that have created such conditions.\n","PeriodicalId":43302,"journal":{"name":"Housing Care and Support","volume":"152 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Care and Support","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/HCS-05-2018-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide a supply-side review of policies and practices that impact on the shortage of supply in the contemporary specialist housing market for older people in the UK. Design/methodology/approach The review is based on a review of academic literature, policy documents, reports and other sources. Findings There is a critical conflict between the key social purpose of specialist housing (i.e. living independent of socially provided care) and the values that underpin and ultimately limit the quantity of units in both the social and private sector. In the social sector, government policies prohibit rather than encourage local authorities and housing associations from increasing specialist housing stock. The nature of leasehold tenures in the private sector tends to commodify not only housing stock but also those who use it and therefore acts to instrumentalise housing supply in favour of the profit motive and the focus on the person and her or his needs is largely ignored. Originality/value While the shortage of specialist housing is well known, this paper is unique in that it provides a comprehensive and critical supply-side review of the factors that have created such conditions.
对英国专业住房市场的供给面分析,以及为什么它不利于老年人
本文的目的是提供对英国当代老年人专业住房市场供应短缺影响的政策和实践的供给侧审查。设计/方法/途径本次审查是基于对学术文献、政策文件、报告和其他来源的审查。研究结果专家住房的主要社会目的(即生活独立于社会提供的护理)与支持并最终限制社会和私营部门单位数量的价值观之间存在严重冲突。在社会部门,政府政策禁止而不是鼓励地方当局和住房协会增加专门住房存量。私营部门租赁的性质不仅使住房存量商品化,而且使使用住房的人商品化,因此使住房供应工具化,有利于利润动机,而对个人及其需要的关注在很大程度上被忽视了。虽然专业住房的短缺是众所周知的,但本文的独特之处在于,它对造成这种情况的因素提供了全面而关键的供应方面的回顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Housing Care and Support
Housing Care and Support URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信