Public Prognosis Explanations, End-of-life Care, Decision-maker Hopes, and Related Factors

G. Yoshimura, Ai Hamamoto, Kyoka Sakaguchi, Shoko Ando, Kazuki Sato
{"title":"Public Prognosis Explanations, End-of-life Care, Decision-maker Hopes, and Related Factors","authors":"G. Yoshimura, Ai Hamamoto, Kyoka Sakaguchi, Shoko Ando, Kazuki Sato","doi":"10.2512/jspm.17.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Care Res 2022; 17(1): Purpose: This study clarified the general public ’ s end-of-life decision-making expectations and related factors. Method: We analyzed secondary data of 1,000 adults surveyed through the Internet. The outcome was to deter-mine the life expectancy at the end of life, end-of-life care, and decision-makers ’ wishes. Results: Regarding the prognosis, 54% wanted to know the life expectancy in end-of-life. This preference was independently associated with being notified of cancer at a young age, trust in medical professionals, and the view of life and death that disappears. Regarding end-of-life care preferences, 11% requested active treatment, and 58% requested palliative care. This preference was independently associated with older age, women, and an emphasis on being pain-free and being yourself. Regarding decision-makers ’ preferences, 77% wanted to decide for themselves, and 11% wanted to decide for their families. This preference was independently associated with the young, carefree of life and death, who did not want to be notified of cancer. Conclusion: We revealed the general public ’ s de-sire for end-of-life decision-making and associated factors. In clinical practice, it can be used for screening.","PeriodicalId":19883,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2512/jspm.17.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Care Res 2022; 17(1): Purpose: This study clarified the general public ’ s end-of-life decision-making expectations and related factors. Method: We analyzed secondary data of 1,000 adults surveyed through the Internet. The outcome was to deter-mine the life expectancy at the end of life, end-of-life care, and decision-makers ’ wishes. Results: Regarding the prognosis, 54% wanted to know the life expectancy in end-of-life. This preference was independently associated with being notified of cancer at a young age, trust in medical professionals, and the view of life and death that disappears. Regarding end-of-life care preferences, 11% requested active treatment, and 58% requested palliative care. This preference was independently associated with older age, women, and an emphasis on being pain-free and being yourself. Regarding decision-makers ’ preferences, 77% wanted to decide for themselves, and 11% wanted to decide for their families. This preference was independently associated with the young, carefree of life and death, who did not want to be notified of cancer. Conclusion: We revealed the general public ’ s de-sire for end-of-life decision-making and associated factors. In clinical practice, it can be used for screening.
公众预后解释、临终关怀、决策者希望及相关因素
Care Res 2022;17(1):目的:本研究明确了普通民众的临终决策期望及相关因素。方法:通过网络对1000名成年人进行二次调查。结果是确定生命结束时的预期寿命,临终关怀和决策者的愿望。结果:在预后方面,有54%的患者希望了解患者临终时的预期寿命。这种偏好与年轻时被告知患有癌症、对医疗专业人员的信任以及对生死的看法消失有独立的关系。关于临终关怀偏好,11%的人要求积极治疗,58%的人要求姑息治疗。这种偏好与年龄较大、女性以及对无痛和做自己的强调独立相关。关于决策者的偏好,77%的人希望为自己做决定,11%的人希望为家人做决定。这种偏好与年轻、对生死无忧无虑、不希望被告知癌症的人独立相关。结论:我们揭示了公众对临终决策的渴望及其相关因素。在临床实践中,可用于筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信