{"title":"Late Breaking Abstract - Morphine for dyspnea in advanced pulmonary arterial hypertension","authors":"D. Christiansen, K. Wentlandt, J. Lew, J. Granton","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa3948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Whether morphine is useful for improving dyspnea and exercise capacity in advanced pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is unclear. Methods: Patients with PAH with WHO FC III symptoms despite therapy were enrolled in a randomized, cross-over study of oral morphine sulfate 5mg versus no drug prior to two six-minute walk tests (6MWT) performed within 7 days. The primary outcome was peak Borg dyspnea score. Safety outcomes were symptom scores and changes in vital signs. Data were analyzed using a paired t-test. Results: 12 patients were enrolled and 2 were withdrawn (one due to syncope on a control 6MWT and one due to intercurrent illness). Among those completing the study, median disease duration was 4.6 years and 90% were on dual or triple targeted PAH therapy. The peak Borg dyspnea score did not differ with morphine versus control (4.7 vs 5.0, p=0.34). Borg scores at 2, 4 and 6 minutes of the 6MWT were lower with morphine but did not reach statistical significance. The mean 6MWD was 349m with morphine versus 342m with control (p=0.38). No significant differences in clinically important symptoms or side effects were detected with morphine. Changes in systolic blood pressure response (+22 vs +11mmHg, p=0.18), heart rate response (+38 vs +35bpm, p=0.36), and nadir oxygen saturation (86 vs 86%, p=1) with exercise did not differ (morphine vs control). Conclusion: Oral morphine did not improve peak dyspnea scores or exercise capacity in patients with advanced PAH. The improvement in submaximal dyspnea scores with morphine did not achieve statistical significance. Limitations relate to small subject numbers and absence of blinding. Morphine was not associated with side effects or worsening of vital signs.","PeriodicalId":21522,"journal":{"name":"Right ventricle","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Right ventricle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa3948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background: Whether morphine is useful for improving dyspnea and exercise capacity in advanced pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is unclear. Methods: Patients with PAH with WHO FC III symptoms despite therapy were enrolled in a randomized, cross-over study of oral morphine sulfate 5mg versus no drug prior to two six-minute walk tests (6MWT) performed within 7 days. The primary outcome was peak Borg dyspnea score. Safety outcomes were symptom scores and changes in vital signs. Data were analyzed using a paired t-test. Results: 12 patients were enrolled and 2 were withdrawn (one due to syncope on a control 6MWT and one due to intercurrent illness). Among those completing the study, median disease duration was 4.6 years and 90% were on dual or triple targeted PAH therapy. The peak Borg dyspnea score did not differ with morphine versus control (4.7 vs 5.0, p=0.34). Borg scores at 2, 4 and 6 minutes of the 6MWT were lower with morphine but did not reach statistical significance. The mean 6MWD was 349m with morphine versus 342m with control (p=0.38). No significant differences in clinically important symptoms or side effects were detected with morphine. Changes in systolic blood pressure response (+22 vs +11mmHg, p=0.18), heart rate response (+38 vs +35bpm, p=0.36), and nadir oxygen saturation (86 vs 86%, p=1) with exercise did not differ (morphine vs control). Conclusion: Oral morphine did not improve peak dyspnea scores or exercise capacity in patients with advanced PAH. The improvement in submaximal dyspnea scores with morphine did not achieve statistical significance. Limitations relate to small subject numbers and absence of blinding. Morphine was not associated with side effects or worsening of vital signs.
背景:吗啡是否有助于改善晚期肺动脉高压(PAH)患者的呼吸困难和运动能力尚不清楚。方法:在7天内进行两次6分钟步行试验(6MWT)之前,有WHO FC III症状的PAH患者被纳入一项随机交叉研究,口服硫酸吗啡5mg与不服用吗啡。主要观察指标为Borg呼吸困难评分峰值。安全性结果是症状评分和生命体征的变化。数据分析采用配对t检验。结果:12名患者入组,2名患者退出治疗(1名因对照组6MWT晕厥,1名因合并疾病)。在完成研究的患者中,中位病程为4.6年,90%的患者接受双靶向或三联靶向多环芳烃治疗。吗啡组与对照组的Borg呼吸困难峰值评分无差异(4.7 vs 5.0, p=0.34)。吗啡组在6MWT第2、4、6分钟时Borg评分较低,但无统计学意义。吗啡组平均6MWD为349米,对照组为342米(p=0.38)。吗啡组在临床重要症状或副作用方面无显著差异。运动时收缩压反应(+22 vs +11mmHg, p=0.18)、心率反应(+38 vs +35bpm, p=0.36)和最低血氧饱和度(86 vs 86%, p=1)的变化没有差异(吗啡vs对照组)。结论:口服吗啡不能改善晚期PAH患者的高峰呼吸困难评分或运动能力。吗啡对次极大呼吸困难评分的改善无统计学意义。限制与受试者数量少和缺乏盲法有关。吗啡与副作用或生命体征恶化无关。