{"title":"The Necessary Accidental","authors":"Ashraf Jamal","doi":"10.36615/thethinker.v87i2.527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay on William Kentridge’s ideas and practice, in particular regarding his multi-media theatrical works, was prompted by a visit to Zeitz MOCAA to see his retrospective in 2019. Watching a documentary on the making of the ‘The Head and The Load’, I was struck by the production’s frenzied energy, and the exhaustive attempt to break down any predictive or conclusive vision. This has always been Kentridge’s approach – his animated works are exercises in a deconstructive erasure. I have addressed this matter elsewhere, in my essay ‘Faith in a Practical Epistemology: On Collective Creativity in Theatre’ (Predicaments of Culture in South Africa, 2005), but on this occasion, while watching the documentary, it was Nietzsche’s view in Contra Wagner which proved the trigger, namely, that ‘Wagner’s art is sick. The problems he brings to the stage – purely hysteric’s problems – the convulsiveness of his affects, his over-charged sensibility … the instability he disguises as a principle’. While Kentridge does not share Wagner’s reactionary ideology, I argue that there is a connection between the two whose root lies in a decadent sensibility. And the peculiarly late-modern Western crisis that underlies it.","PeriodicalId":34673,"journal":{"name":"The Thinker","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Thinker","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36615/thethinker.v87i2.527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This essay on William Kentridge’s ideas and practice, in particular regarding his multi-media theatrical works, was prompted by a visit to Zeitz MOCAA to see his retrospective in 2019. Watching a documentary on the making of the ‘The Head and The Load’, I was struck by the production’s frenzied energy, and the exhaustive attempt to break down any predictive or conclusive vision. This has always been Kentridge’s approach – his animated works are exercises in a deconstructive erasure. I have addressed this matter elsewhere, in my essay ‘Faith in a Practical Epistemology: On Collective Creativity in Theatre’ (Predicaments of Culture in South Africa, 2005), but on this occasion, while watching the documentary, it was Nietzsche’s view in Contra Wagner which proved the trigger, namely, that ‘Wagner’s art is sick. The problems he brings to the stage – purely hysteric’s problems – the convulsiveness of his affects, his over-charged sensibility … the instability he disguises as a principle’. While Kentridge does not share Wagner’s reactionary ideology, I argue that there is a connection between the two whose root lies in a decadent sensibility. And the peculiarly late-modern Western crisis that underlies it.
这篇关于威廉·肯特里奇的思想和实践的文章,特别是关于他的多媒体戏剧作品,是在参观2019年蔡茨当代艺术博物馆的回顾展后产生的。在观看《头与负荷》(the Head and the Load)制作过程中的纪录片时,我被剧组疯狂的精力和打破任何预测性或结论性愿景的详尽尝试所打动。这一直是肯特里奇的方法——他的动画作品是解构主义抹除的练习。我已经在其他地方讨论过这个问题,在我的文章“实践认识论的信仰:关于戏剧中的集体创造力”(南非文化困境,2005),但在这个场合,当观看纪录片时,尼采在《反瓦格纳》中的观点证明了触发因素,即“瓦格纳的艺术是病态的”。他带到舞台上的问题——纯粹歇斯底里的问题——他的情感的痉挛,他过度的感性……他伪装成原则的不稳定。”虽然肯特里奇并不认同瓦格纳的反动思想,但我认为这两者之间存在着一种联系,其根源在于一种颓废的情感。以及其背后的近代西方特有的危机。