Diagnosing Mental Models of Undergraduate Student and Physics Teachers: Study Case in the Momentum and Energy Conservation Principles Using Newton's Cradle

C. Sarapak, K. Kearns
{"title":"Diagnosing Mental Models of Undergraduate Student and Physics Teachers: Study Case in the Momentum and Energy Conservation Principles Using Newton's Cradle","authors":"C. Sarapak, K. Kearns","doi":"10.15294/jpii.v11i4.37695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Newton’s Cradle comprises a series of pendulums often used in physics classrooms to demonstrate the principles of conservation of momentum and kinetic energy in elastic collisions. By utilizing open-ended questions and several Newton’s cradle scenarios, this study aims to clarify how the Newton’s cradle can be used for assessing the mental models of the principles of conservation of momentum and energy. Interviews with 18 college students and five physics professors each lasted 30 to 45 minutes. Firstly, they were asked to explain how the Newton’s cradle works. Next, a scenario started with three balls with equal masses where one collides with the other two, they were asked to explain if the possible outcomes for a collision with initial momentum = mv1 + 0 + 0 and the final momentum = (-mv1/3) + (2mv1/3) + (2mv1/3). With a five-ball Newton’s Cradle, students were asked to explain the outcomes when 1) one collides with the other four, 2) two collide with the other three, 3) three collide with the other two, and 4) four collide with the last one. Their drawings and explanations dealing with the Newton’s cradle during the interviews were analyzed for their mental models and categorized into patterns. The results showed that both university students and physics teachers hold misinformed conceptions about conservation of momentum and energy and have unsound mental models in the context of Newton’s Cradle. We also found that they did not recognize that sound and heat or lack of exact alignment of the balls are factors accountable for loss of energy causing the Newton’s Cradle to depart from idealized situation. Based on the interview data, teaching principles of the conservation of momentum and energy through use of Newton’s cradle are deficient and curriculum review is suggested.","PeriodicalId":37652,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i4.37695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Newton’s Cradle comprises a series of pendulums often used in physics classrooms to demonstrate the principles of conservation of momentum and kinetic energy in elastic collisions. By utilizing open-ended questions and several Newton’s cradle scenarios, this study aims to clarify how the Newton’s cradle can be used for assessing the mental models of the principles of conservation of momentum and energy. Interviews with 18 college students and five physics professors each lasted 30 to 45 minutes. Firstly, they were asked to explain how the Newton’s cradle works. Next, a scenario started with three balls with equal masses where one collides with the other two, they were asked to explain if the possible outcomes for a collision with initial momentum = mv1 + 0 + 0 and the final momentum = (-mv1/3) + (2mv1/3) + (2mv1/3). With a five-ball Newton’s Cradle, students were asked to explain the outcomes when 1) one collides with the other four, 2) two collide with the other three, 3) three collide with the other two, and 4) four collide with the last one. Their drawings and explanations dealing with the Newton’s cradle during the interviews were analyzed for their mental models and categorized into patterns. The results showed that both university students and physics teachers hold misinformed conceptions about conservation of momentum and energy and have unsound mental models in the context of Newton’s Cradle. We also found that they did not recognize that sound and heat or lack of exact alignment of the balls are factors accountable for loss of energy causing the Newton’s Cradle to depart from idealized situation. Based on the interview data, teaching principles of the conservation of momentum and energy through use of Newton’s cradle are deficient and curriculum review is suggested.
本科学生和物理教师的心理模型诊断——以牛顿摇篮中的动量和能量守恒原理为例
牛顿的摇篮由一系列钟摆组成,经常用于物理教室,以演示弹性碰撞中的动量和动能守恒原理。通过使用开放式问题和几个牛顿摇篮场景,本研究旨在阐明如何使用牛顿摇篮来评估动量和能量守恒原理的心理模型。对18名大学生和5名物理教授的采访时长各为30 ~ 45分钟。首先,他们被要求解释牛顿的摇篮是如何工作的。接下来,一个场景开始于三个质量相等的球,其中一个与另外两个碰撞,他们被要求解释碰撞的可能结果是否为初始动量= mv1 + 0 + 0,最终动量= (-mv1/3) + (2mv1/3) + (2mv1/3)。在一个有五个球的牛顿摇中,学生们被要求解释当1)一个球与另外四个球碰撞,2)两个球与另外三个球碰撞,3)三个球与另外两个球碰撞,4)四个球与最后一个球碰撞时的结果。他们在采访中对牛顿摇篮的图画和解释进行了分析,以形成他们的思维模式,并将其分类为模式。结果表明,在牛顿的摇篮背景下,大学生和物理教师对动量和能量守恒的观念存在误区,心智模式不健全。我们还发现,他们没有认识到声音和热量或球的不精确对齐是导致牛顿摇篮偏离理想状态的能量损失的因素。根据访谈数据,利用牛顿摇篮进行动量和能量守恒的教学原理存在不足,建议对课程进行复习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: This journal publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy, and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. Moreover, this journal also covers the issues concerned with environmental education & environmental science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信