HPLC investigation of carbohydrates and phenolic constituents of Livistona decipiens and Livistona australis leaves and assessment of their ulceroprotective activity
F. S. Elshaarawy, S. Mina, Nagwan M. Gabr, S. M. Abdel-Khalik, Rehab Kamel, H. Ibrahim, E. Haggag
{"title":"HPLC investigation of carbohydrates and phenolic constituents of Livistona decipiens and Livistona australis leaves and assessment of their ulceroprotective activity","authors":"F. S. Elshaarawy, S. Mina, Nagwan M. Gabr, S. M. Abdel-Khalik, Rehab Kamel, H. Ibrahim, E. Haggag","doi":"10.21608/APRH.2018.8068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study aimed to compare two Livistona species; Livistona decipiens Becc and Livistona australis Mart for their phenolic and carbohydrate contents and for their protective activity against ulcerative colitis. Methods: A high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) technique with inline connected to photo diode array detector (DAD) and electro array (EA) used for detection of the polyphenolic contents. Also HPLC with refractive index detection (HPLC-RI) was used to determine and to quantify carbohydrate contents before and after partial acid hydrolysis, using 0.2 N H2SO4, for 3 h at 100°C, for each of the defatted methanol extract concentrate. Protective activity against ulcerative colitis was evaluated by acetic acid inducing-ulcers method for both methanol extracts of both species. Results: Both investigated Livistona species are rich in polyphenolic constituents, showing a great similarity. The major flavonoid compound in both species was luteolin-6-C-arabinoside-8-C-glucoside and the major aglycone was acacetin, while the major phenolic acid in both species was ellagic acid. However there was a difference in the carbohydrate content between the two species, the main sugars, before hydrolysis, in L. decipiens were arabinose, mannose and sucrose, while the main sugars in L. australis were glucose, fructose and maltose. However, stachyose was the major polysaccharide obtained after partial acid hydrolysis. L. australis showed protective activity against ulcerative colitis in lower dose 500 mg/kg when compared to L. decipiens that only showed effectiveness at a doubled dose 1000 mg/kg. Conclusion: Both Livistona species have potential medicinal value being rich in polyphenolic and polysaccharide contents and having protective activity against ulcerative colitis.","PeriodicalId":15017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Research","volume":"112 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/APRH.2018.8068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to compare two Livistona species; Livistona decipiens Becc and Livistona australis Mart for their phenolic and carbohydrate contents and for their protective activity against ulcerative colitis. Methods: A high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) technique with inline connected to photo diode array detector (DAD) and electro array (EA) used for detection of the polyphenolic contents. Also HPLC with refractive index detection (HPLC-RI) was used to determine and to quantify carbohydrate contents before and after partial acid hydrolysis, using 0.2 N H2SO4, for 3 h at 100°C, for each of the defatted methanol extract concentrate. Protective activity against ulcerative colitis was evaluated by acetic acid inducing-ulcers method for both methanol extracts of both species. Results: Both investigated Livistona species are rich in polyphenolic constituents, showing a great similarity. The major flavonoid compound in both species was luteolin-6-C-arabinoside-8-C-glucoside and the major aglycone was acacetin, while the major phenolic acid in both species was ellagic acid. However there was a difference in the carbohydrate content between the two species, the main sugars, before hydrolysis, in L. decipiens were arabinose, mannose and sucrose, while the main sugars in L. australis were glucose, fructose and maltose. However, stachyose was the major polysaccharide obtained after partial acid hydrolysis. L. australis showed protective activity against ulcerative colitis in lower dose 500 mg/kg when compared to L. decipiens that only showed effectiveness at a doubled dose 1000 mg/kg. Conclusion: Both Livistona species have potential medicinal value being rich in polyphenolic and polysaccharide contents and having protective activity against ulcerative colitis.
目的:本研究旨在比较两个Livistona种;牛肉藤和牛肉藤的酚类和碳水化合物含量以及对溃疡性结肠炎的保护作用。方法:采用光电二极管阵列检测器(DAD)和电子阵列检测器(EA)相结合的高效液相色谱法(HPLC)检测多酚含量。采用高效液相色谱(HPLC)和折射率检测(HPLC- ri)测定了各脱脂甲醇提取物浓缩液在100°C下,用0.2 N H2SO4部分酸水解3 h后的碳水化合物含量。采用醋酸诱导溃疡法评价两种植物甲醇提取物对溃疡性结肠炎的保护作用。结果:两种植物均含有丰富的多酚类成分,具有很大的相似性。两种植物的主要类黄酮化合物为木犀草素-6- c -阿拉伯糖苷-8- c -葡萄糖苷,主要苷元为荆芥苷,主要酚酸为鞣花酸。但两种植物的碳水化合物含量存在差异,水解前的主要糖类为阿拉伯糖、甘露糖和蔗糖,而水解前的主要糖类为葡萄糖、果糖和麦芽糖。而水苏糖是经部分酸水解得到的主要多糖。与乳杆菌相比,南乳杆菌在低剂量500mg /kg时显示出对溃疡性结肠炎的保护作用,而乳杆菌只有在双倍剂量1000mg /kg时才显示出效果。结论:两种植物均含有丰富的多酚和多糖,对溃疡性结肠炎具有保护作用,具有潜在的药用价值。