The Effect of Incentives and Leadership Styles on Creative Performance

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting
Sariyatul Ilyana, M. Sholihin
{"title":"The Effect of Incentives and Leadership Styles on Creative Performance","authors":"Sariyatul Ilyana, M. Sholihin","doi":"10.22146/JIEB.59893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction/Main Objectives: This study investigates whether the type of incentives offered and leadership styles interact to affect creative performance. Background Problems: Creativity is highly needed by companies to survive in a volatile business environment. Prior research found that management control systems and the leadership style were able to stimulate creativity. It is still unclear which type of incentives and leadership styles are able to stimulate creativity. Therefore, this research proposes a research question, what kind of management control systems and leadership style can improve creative performance? Novelty: This research focuses on comparing monetary and non-monetary incentives, based on competition, to produce the most creative ideas, but empirical studies into the context of creativity are still limited. Furthermore, this study investigates two different leadership styles and it sheds light on the fact that the leadership styles needed in a creative environment differ from those styles used in a non-creative environment. Research Methods: This study was conducted using a 2x2 between subject experimental design with two incentive treatments (tournament and recognition) and two leadership style treatments (directive and empowering). Finding/Results: Consistent with Lourenco (2016), monetary incentives (including tournaments) and non-monetary incentives (recognition) are substitutive. Furthermore, the empowering leadership style leads to a greater creative performance than the directive style does. The results indicate that, in the condition of a tournament incentive, empowering leadership is able to produce a higher creative performance than directive leadership can. Conclusion: There is no significantly difference between the effect of monetary incentives and non-monetary incentives on creative performance. This study’s result is consistent with the situational leadership theory, certain types of leadership are appropriate for certain environmental conditions. For improved creative performance, employees need to be empowered because they need the authority and freedom to develop ideas. This study provides knowledge about the impact of incentives and leadership styles on creative performance. Furthermore, this study provides practical knowledge for companies on how to improve creativity in the work environment by using certain incentives and leadership styles.","PeriodicalId":31597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business","volume":"60 1","pages":"14-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/JIEB.59893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction/Main Objectives: This study investigates whether the type of incentives offered and leadership styles interact to affect creative performance. Background Problems: Creativity is highly needed by companies to survive in a volatile business environment. Prior research found that management control systems and the leadership style were able to stimulate creativity. It is still unclear which type of incentives and leadership styles are able to stimulate creativity. Therefore, this research proposes a research question, what kind of management control systems and leadership style can improve creative performance? Novelty: This research focuses on comparing monetary and non-monetary incentives, based on competition, to produce the most creative ideas, but empirical studies into the context of creativity are still limited. Furthermore, this study investigates two different leadership styles and it sheds light on the fact that the leadership styles needed in a creative environment differ from those styles used in a non-creative environment. Research Methods: This study was conducted using a 2x2 between subject experimental design with two incentive treatments (tournament and recognition) and two leadership style treatments (directive and empowering). Finding/Results: Consistent with Lourenco (2016), monetary incentives (including tournaments) and non-monetary incentives (recognition) are substitutive. Furthermore, the empowering leadership style leads to a greater creative performance than the directive style does. The results indicate that, in the condition of a tournament incentive, empowering leadership is able to produce a higher creative performance than directive leadership can. Conclusion: There is no significantly difference between the effect of monetary incentives and non-monetary incentives on creative performance. This study’s result is consistent with the situational leadership theory, certain types of leadership are appropriate for certain environmental conditions. For improved creative performance, employees need to be empowered because they need the authority and freedom to develop ideas. This study provides knowledge about the impact of incentives and leadership styles on creative performance. Furthermore, this study provides practical knowledge for companies on how to improve creativity in the work environment by using certain incentives and leadership styles.
激励与领导风格对创造性绩效的影响
引言/主要目的:本研究调查是否提供的激励类型和领导风格相互作用,以影响创造性表现。背景问题:要在动荡的商业环境中生存,企业非常需要创造力。先前的研究发现,管理控制系统和领导风格能够激发创造力。目前尚不清楚哪种激励措施和领导风格能够激发创造力。因此,本研究提出了一个研究问题,什么样的管理控制系统和领导风格可以提高创新绩效?新颖性:本研究侧重于比较基于竞争的货币和非货币激励,以产生最具创造性的想法,但在创造力背景下的实证研究仍然有限。此外,本研究调查了两种不同的领导风格,并阐明了创造性环境中所需的领导风格与非创造性环境中使用的领导风格不同的事实。研究方法:本研究采用两种激励处理(竞赛和认可)和两种领导风格处理(指示和授权)的受试者实验设计之间的2x2关系进行。发现/结果:与洛伦索(2016)一致,货币激励(包括比赛)和非货币激励(认可)是替代的。此外,授权型领导风格比指令型领导风格能带来更大的创造性表现。研究结果表明,在竞赛激励条件下,授权型领导比指令型领导能够产生更高的创造性绩效。结论:货币激励与非货币激励对创新绩效的影响无显著差异。本研究的结果与情境领导理论是一致的,特定类型的领导适合于特定的环境条件。为了提高创造性表现,员工需要被授权,因为他们需要权力和自由来发展想法。这项研究提供了关于激励和领导风格对创造性表现的影响的知识。此外,本研究为公司如何通过使用一定的激励和领导风格来提高工作环境中的创造力提供了实用的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business
Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书