From simulated speech to natural speech, what are the robust features for emotion recognition?

Ya Li, Linlin Chao, Yazhu Liu, Wei Bao, J. Tao
{"title":"From simulated speech to natural speech, what are the robust features for emotion recognition?","authors":"Ya Li, Linlin Chao, Yazhu Liu, Wei Bao, J. Tao","doi":"10.1109/ACII.2015.7344597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The earliest research on emotion recognition starts with simulated/acted stereotypical emotional corpus, and then extends to elicited corpus. Recently, the demanding for real application forces the research shift to natural and spontaneous corpus. Previous research shows that accuracies of emotion recognition are gradual decline from simulated speech, to elicited and totally natural speech. This paper aims to investigate the effects of the common utilized spectral, prosody and voice quality features in emotion recognition with the three types of corpus, and finds out the robust feature for emotion recognition with natural speech. Emotion recognition by several common machine learning methods are carried out and thoroughly compared. Three feature selection methods are performed to find the robust features. The results on six common used corpora confirm that recognition accuracies decrease when the corpus changing from simulated to natural corpus. In addition, prosody and voice quality features are robust for emotion recognition on simulated corpus, while spectral feature is robust in elicited and natural corpus.","PeriodicalId":6863,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII)","volume":"64 1","pages":"368-373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2015.7344597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

The earliest research on emotion recognition starts with simulated/acted stereotypical emotional corpus, and then extends to elicited corpus. Recently, the demanding for real application forces the research shift to natural and spontaneous corpus. Previous research shows that accuracies of emotion recognition are gradual decline from simulated speech, to elicited and totally natural speech. This paper aims to investigate the effects of the common utilized spectral, prosody and voice quality features in emotion recognition with the three types of corpus, and finds out the robust feature for emotion recognition with natural speech. Emotion recognition by several common machine learning methods are carried out and thoroughly compared. Three feature selection methods are performed to find the robust features. The results on six common used corpora confirm that recognition accuracies decrease when the corpus changing from simulated to natural corpus. In addition, prosody and voice quality features are robust for emotion recognition on simulated corpus, while spectral feature is robust in elicited and natural corpus.
从模拟语音到自然语音,情感识别的鲁棒性特征是什么?
情绪识别的研究最早是从模拟/行为的刻板印象情绪语料库开始的,然后扩展到引出语料库。近年来,实际应用的需求迫使研究转向自然自发语料库。以往的研究表明,情绪识别的准确性从模拟语音到引出的完全自然的语音是逐渐下降的。本文旨在利用这三种语料库研究常用的频谱、韵律和音质特征在情感识别中的作用,找出用于自然语音情感识别的鲁棒性特征。对几种常用的机器学习方法进行了情感识别,并进行了比较。采用三种特征选择方法寻找鲁棒特征。在6种常用语料库上的实验结果表明,当语料库由模拟语料库转换为自然语料库时,识别准确率下降。此外,韵律和语音质量特征对模拟语料库的情感识别具有鲁棒性,而谱特征对自然语料库和人工语料库的情感识别具有鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信