Frustrating Times: Notes from the Field

Stephanie Jones
{"title":"Frustrating Times: Notes from the Field","authors":"Stephanie Jones","doi":"10.19164/ijcle.2023.1298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Business Law Clinics’ involvement in advising Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) reached an interesting crescendo during the pandemic as businesses were often left high and dry by business customers and suppliers who could or would not fulfil their contractual obligations. SMEs, often sole traders or limited companies with no business premises, found themselves unable to access government support and facing insolvency. Many had no contracts in place, or they sought to rely on their terms and conditions of business only to find them lacking due to reasons grounded in law (there is no freestanding concept of force majeure under English law and if a contract is silent on it, English law will not imply it) or process (lack of incorporation of terms through their own fault). In this note I seek to examine the impact of the pandemic on the concept of force majeure and contractual remedies for SMEs in the UK and to contemplate the role of business law clinics in advising SMEs on the use of terms and conditions in business-to-business (B2B) contracts as part of successful operations in the post-Covid world. Drafting sets of terms and conditions for SME clients is a perfect vehicle for meeting the goals of a university business law clinic – community engagement with local SMEs providing them with fast, tailored advice with a bespoke tangible document to take away plus student experience of real- world learning in commercial law (experience which is not always readily available for students outside the big cities).","PeriodicalId":31794,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Legal Education","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Legal Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19164/ijcle.2023.1298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Business Law Clinics’ involvement in advising Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) reached an interesting crescendo during the pandemic as businesses were often left high and dry by business customers and suppliers who could or would not fulfil their contractual obligations. SMEs, often sole traders or limited companies with no business premises, found themselves unable to access government support and facing insolvency. Many had no contracts in place, or they sought to rely on their terms and conditions of business only to find them lacking due to reasons grounded in law (there is no freestanding concept of force majeure under English law and if a contract is silent on it, English law will not imply it) or process (lack of incorporation of terms through their own fault). In this note I seek to examine the impact of the pandemic on the concept of force majeure and contractual remedies for SMEs in the UK and to contemplate the role of business law clinics in advising SMEs on the use of terms and conditions in business-to-business (B2B) contracts as part of successful operations in the post-Covid world. Drafting sets of terms and conditions for SME clients is a perfect vehicle for meeting the goals of a university business law clinic – community engagement with local SMEs providing them with fast, tailored advice with a bespoke tangible document to take away plus student experience of real- world learning in commercial law (experience which is not always readily available for students outside the big cities).
令人沮丧的时刻:来自现场的笔记
商业法律诊所参与为中小企业提供咨询的工作在疫情期间达到了一个有趣的高潮,因为企业往往被不能或不愿履行合同义务的企业客户和供应商孤立无援。中小企业往往是没有经营场所的个体经营者或有限公司,它们发现自己无法获得政府支持,面临破产。许多人没有签订合同,或者他们试图依靠他们的商业条款和条件,但却发现由于法律原因(英国法律中没有不可抗力的独立概念,如果合同对此保持沉默,英国法律也不会暗示不可抗力)或过程(由于他们自己的过错而缺乏条款)而缺乏。在本文中,我试图研究大流行对英国中小企业不可抗力概念和合同救济的影响,并考虑商业法律诊所在为中小企业提供关于在企业对企业(B2B)合同中使用条款和条件的建议方面的作用,这是后疫情时代成功运营的一部分。为中小企业客户起草一系列条款和条件是实现大学商法诊所目标的完美工具——与当地中小企业进行社区接触,为他们提供快速、量身定制的建议,并提供定制的有形文件,再加上学生在现实世界中学习商法的经验(对于大城市以外的学生来说,这种经验并不总是容易获得的)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信