Investigating New Literacies Among Teacher Educators: A Multi-Institution Collaborative Self-Study

B. Nash, Tala Michelle Karkar Esperat, K. Pierce, Courtney Shimek, C. Rose, Lyudmyla Ivanyuk, Lauren Fletcher
{"title":"Investigating New Literacies Among Teacher Educators: A Multi-Institution Collaborative Self-Study","authors":"B. Nash, Tala Michelle Karkar Esperat, K. Pierce, Courtney Shimek, C. Rose, Lyudmyla Ivanyuk, Lauren Fletcher","doi":"10.1177/23813377231179192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This multi-institutional, collaborative self-study explores how teacher educators learn to embed new literacies (NL) in teacher education coursework. Utilizing collaborative self-study methodology, seven faculty engaged in a year-long collaborative study focused on the incorporation of NL in preservice teacher education courses, meeting regularly over the course of the year to share reflections, provide feedback to one another, and continually revise course and assignment designs related to NL. Data sources included recordings of collaborative planning meetings, written reflections, annotated teaching artifacts, notes and transcripts from partner and whole group recorded Zoom sessions and post-meeting reflections. The findings describe diversity in both conceptualizing and teaching NL, parallels between teacher educators’, preservice teachers’ and P-12 teachers’ challenges integrating NL into their teaching, and institutional barriers to collaborative study, curricular revision, and the use of new technologies. The authors discuss these findings in relation to the potential value of multi-institutional study groups and collaborative self-study as a methodology for helping support literacy teacher educators’ ongoing learning.","PeriodicalId":91923,"journal":{"name":"Literacy research : theory, method, and practice","volume":"152 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literacy research : theory, method, and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23813377231179192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This multi-institutional, collaborative self-study explores how teacher educators learn to embed new literacies (NL) in teacher education coursework. Utilizing collaborative self-study methodology, seven faculty engaged in a year-long collaborative study focused on the incorporation of NL in preservice teacher education courses, meeting regularly over the course of the year to share reflections, provide feedback to one another, and continually revise course and assignment designs related to NL. Data sources included recordings of collaborative planning meetings, written reflections, annotated teaching artifacts, notes and transcripts from partner and whole group recorded Zoom sessions and post-meeting reflections. The findings describe diversity in both conceptualizing and teaching NL, parallels between teacher educators’, preservice teachers’ and P-12 teachers’ challenges integrating NL into their teaching, and institutional barriers to collaborative study, curricular revision, and the use of new technologies. The authors discuss these findings in relation to the potential value of multi-institutional study groups and collaborative self-study as a methodology for helping support literacy teacher educators’ ongoing learning.
教师教育工作者的新素养研究:多机构合作自学
这个多机构合作的自学研究探讨了教师教育者如何学习在教师教育课程中嵌入新素养(NL)。利用合作自学方法,七名教师参与了为期一年的合作研究,重点是将NL纳入职前教师教育课程,在一年中定期会面,分享反思,相互提供反馈,并不断修改与NL相关的课程和作业设计。数据来源包括协作计划会议的记录、书面反思、注释教学工件、合伙人和整个小组记录的Zoom会议和会后反思的笔记和抄本。研究结果描述了NL概念和教学的多样性,教师教育者、职前教师和P-12教师在将NL融入教学中所面临的挑战之间的相似之处,以及合作研究、课程修订和新技术使用的制度障碍。作者讨论了这些发现与多机构学习小组和协作自学作为帮助支持扫盲教师教育工作者持续学习的方法的潜在价值有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书