High prevalence of female osteoporosis and male osteopenia in patients aged more than 55 years old with upper limb fracture

Chun-Hin Lo, Yen-Yu Chen, Wen-Tien Wu, Ru-Ping Lee, Tzai-Chiu Yu, I. Chen, T. Yao, Kuan-Lin Liu, Cheng-Huan Peng, Jen-Hung Wang, Kuang-Ting Yeh
{"title":"High prevalence of female osteoporosis and male osteopenia in patients aged more than 55 years old with upper limb fracture","authors":"Chun-Hin Lo, Yen-Yu Chen, Wen-Tien Wu, Ru-Ping Lee, Tzai-Chiu Yu, I. Chen, T. Yao, Kuan-Lin Liu, Cheng-Huan Peng, Jen-Hung Wang, Kuang-Ting Yeh","doi":"10.6492/FJMD.202102_12(1).0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: According to literature and osteoporosis treatment guidelines, both men and women with distal radius fractures (DRFx) and proximal humerus fractures (PHFx) caused by low-energy trauma may have undetected osteoporosis. Although upper limb fracture is a known predictor of subsequent osteoporotic fracture, the rates of prompt bone mineral density (BMD) evaluation and antiosteoporotic management in these patients remains much lower than those in patients with hip or spine fractures. Purpose: To evaluate the awareness of the physician for survey osteoporosis and to identify the association of the aforementioned fractures after falls with osteoporosis based on BMD estimated through dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Methods: We collected the parameters, including ethnicity, comorbidities, age, sex, and BMD data of the patients aged ≥ 55 years who sustained DRFx or PHFx and their BMD examination rates as physician awareness rate of possible osteoporosis. The incidence of osteoporosis among patients with these fractures was compared and associated risk factors were identified. Results: The physician awareness rates were 65.1% in DRFx and 66.0% in PHFx. Four hundred and twenty-one patients with DRFx and 219 patients with PHFx were included. Of the patients, 239 were male and 401 were female, and their mean age was 67.1 ± 6.5 years. The osteoporosis rates were 38.0% and 46.6% in DRFx and PHFx. No patient aged more than 70 years had normal BMD in our study group. Most female patients had osteoporosis, whereas most male patients had osteopenia. 7.7% of the patients had normal T scores and only 24.6% of the patients with osteoporosis were undergoing regular antiosteoporotic treatment and follow-up. Those with PHFx had a significantly higher osteoporosis risk than did those with DRFx. Conclusion: Osteoporosis awareness and treatment are crucial after distal radius or PHFx in addition to hip fractures, particularly for female and older patients.","PeriodicalId":100551,"journal":{"name":"Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"129 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6492/FJMD.202102_12(1).0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: According to literature and osteoporosis treatment guidelines, both men and women with distal radius fractures (DRFx) and proximal humerus fractures (PHFx) caused by low-energy trauma may have undetected osteoporosis. Although upper limb fracture is a known predictor of subsequent osteoporotic fracture, the rates of prompt bone mineral density (BMD) evaluation and antiosteoporotic management in these patients remains much lower than those in patients with hip or spine fractures. Purpose: To evaluate the awareness of the physician for survey osteoporosis and to identify the association of the aforementioned fractures after falls with osteoporosis based on BMD estimated through dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Methods: We collected the parameters, including ethnicity, comorbidities, age, sex, and BMD data of the patients aged ≥ 55 years who sustained DRFx or PHFx and their BMD examination rates as physician awareness rate of possible osteoporosis. The incidence of osteoporosis among patients with these fractures was compared and associated risk factors were identified. Results: The physician awareness rates were 65.1% in DRFx and 66.0% in PHFx. Four hundred and twenty-one patients with DRFx and 219 patients with PHFx were included. Of the patients, 239 were male and 401 were female, and their mean age was 67.1 ± 6.5 years. The osteoporosis rates were 38.0% and 46.6% in DRFx and PHFx. No patient aged more than 70 years had normal BMD in our study group. Most female patients had osteoporosis, whereas most male patients had osteopenia. 7.7% of the patients had normal T scores and only 24.6% of the patients with osteoporosis were undergoing regular antiosteoporotic treatment and follow-up. Those with PHFx had a significantly higher osteoporosis risk than did those with DRFx. Conclusion: Osteoporosis awareness and treatment are crucial after distal radius or PHFx in addition to hip fractures, particularly for female and older patients.
55岁以上上肢骨折患者中女性骨质疏松和男性骨质减少发生率高
导读:根据文献和骨质疏松症治疗指南,低能量创伤引起的桡骨远端骨折(DRFx)和肱骨近端骨折(PHFx)的男性和女性均可能存在未被发现的骨质疏松症。尽管上肢骨折是骨质疏松性骨折的一个已知预测因素,但这些患者及时进行骨密度(BMD)评估和抗骨质疏松治疗的比率仍然远低于髋部或脊柱骨折的患者。目的:评价医师对骨质疏松症的调查意识,并根据双能x线骨密度测定的骨密度,确定上述跌倒后骨折与骨质疏松症的关系。方法:收集年龄≥55岁持续使用DRFx或PHFx的患者的种族、合并症、年龄、性别、骨密度等参数以及骨密度检查率作为可能骨质疏松症的医师知知率。比较了这些骨折患者骨质疏松的发生率,并确定了相关的危险因素。结果:医生对DRFx和PHFx的知晓率分别为65.1%和66.0%。纳入了421例DRFx患者和219例PHFx患者。其中男性239例,女性401例,平均年龄67.1±6.5岁。DRFx组和PHFx组骨质疏松率分别为38.0%和46.6%。在我们的研究组中没有超过70岁的患者骨密度正常。大多数女性患者有骨质疏松症,而大多数男性患者有骨质减少。7.7%的患者T评分正常,仅有24.6%的骨质疏松患者定期接受抗骨质疏松治疗和随访。服用PHFx的患者患骨质疏松症的风险明显高于服用DRFx的患者。结论:除髋部骨折外,桡骨远端或PHFx术后骨质疏松意识和治疗至关重要,尤其是女性和老年患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信