Sex‐Related Differences in Clinical Features and In‐Hospital Outcomes of Type B Acute Aortic Dissection: A Registry Study

Toshiyuki Takahashi, H. Yoshino, K. Akutsu, T. Shimokawa, H. Ogino, T. Kunihara, M. Usui, Kazuhiro Watanabe, M. Kawata, H. Masuhara, Manabu Yamasaki, Takeshi Yamamoto, K. Nagao, M. Takayama
{"title":"Sex‐Related Differences in Clinical Features and In‐Hospital Outcomes of Type B Acute Aortic Dissection: A Registry Study","authors":"Toshiyuki Takahashi, H. Yoshino, K. Akutsu, T. Shimokawa, H. Ogino, T. Kunihara, M. Usui, Kazuhiro Watanabe, M. Kawata, H. Masuhara, Manabu Yamasaki, Takeshi Yamamoto, K. Nagao, M. Takayama","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.121.024149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The association between female sex and poor outcomes following surgery for type A acute aortic dissection has been reported; however, sex‐related differences in clinical features and in‐hospital outcomes of type B acute aortic dissection, including classic aortic dissection and intramural hematoma, remain to be elucidated. Methods and Results We studied 2372 patients with type B acute aortic dissection who were enrolled in the Tokyo Acute Aortic Super‐Network Registry. There were fewer and older women than men (median age [interquartile range]: 76 years [66–84 years], n=695 versus 68 years [57–77 years], n=1677; P<0.001). Women presented to the aortic centers later than men. Women had a higher proportion of intramural hematoma (63.7% versus 53.7%, P<0.001), were medically managed more frequently (90.9% versus 86.3%, P=0.002), and had less end‐organ malperfusion (2.4% versus 5.7%, P<0.001) and higher in‐hospital mortality (5.3% versus 2.7%, P=0.002) than men. In multivariable analysis, age (per year, odds ratio [OR], 1.06 [95% CI, 1.03–1.08]; P<0.001), hyperlipidemia (OR, 2.09 [95% CI, 1.13–3.88]; P=0.019), painlessness (OR, 2.59 [95% CI, 1.14–5.89]; P=0.023), shock/hypotension (OR, 2.93 [95% CI, 1.21–7.11]; P=0.017), non–intramural hematoma (OR, 2.31 [95% CI, 1.32–4.05]; P=0.004), aortic rupture (OR, 26.6 [95% CI, 14.1–50.0]; P<0.001), and end‐organ malperfusion (OR, 4.61 [95% CI, 2.11–10.1]; P<0.001) were associated with higher in‐hospital mortality, but was not female sex (OR, 1.67 [95% CI, 0.96–2.91]; P=0.072). Conclusions Women affected with type B acute aortic dissection were older and had more intramural hematoma, a lower incidence of end‐organ malperfusion, and higher in‐hospital mortality than men. However, female sex was not associated with in‐hospital mortality after multivariable adjustment.","PeriodicalId":17189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background The association between female sex and poor outcomes following surgery for type A acute aortic dissection has been reported; however, sex‐related differences in clinical features and in‐hospital outcomes of type B acute aortic dissection, including classic aortic dissection and intramural hematoma, remain to be elucidated. Methods and Results We studied 2372 patients with type B acute aortic dissection who were enrolled in the Tokyo Acute Aortic Super‐Network Registry. There were fewer and older women than men (median age [interquartile range]: 76 years [66–84 years], n=695 versus 68 years [57–77 years], n=1677; P<0.001). Women presented to the aortic centers later than men. Women had a higher proportion of intramural hematoma (63.7% versus 53.7%, P<0.001), were medically managed more frequently (90.9% versus 86.3%, P=0.002), and had less end‐organ malperfusion (2.4% versus 5.7%, P<0.001) and higher in‐hospital mortality (5.3% versus 2.7%, P=0.002) than men. In multivariable analysis, age (per year, odds ratio [OR], 1.06 [95% CI, 1.03–1.08]; P<0.001), hyperlipidemia (OR, 2.09 [95% CI, 1.13–3.88]; P=0.019), painlessness (OR, 2.59 [95% CI, 1.14–5.89]; P=0.023), shock/hypotension (OR, 2.93 [95% CI, 1.21–7.11]; P=0.017), non–intramural hematoma (OR, 2.31 [95% CI, 1.32–4.05]; P=0.004), aortic rupture (OR, 26.6 [95% CI, 14.1–50.0]; P<0.001), and end‐organ malperfusion (OR, 4.61 [95% CI, 2.11–10.1]; P<0.001) were associated with higher in‐hospital mortality, but was not female sex (OR, 1.67 [95% CI, 0.96–2.91]; P=0.072). Conclusions Women affected with type B acute aortic dissection were older and had more intramural hematoma, a lower incidence of end‐organ malperfusion, and higher in‐hospital mortality than men. However, female sex was not associated with in‐hospital mortality after multivariable adjustment.
B型急性主动脉夹层临床特征和住院结果的性别相关差异:一项登记研究
背景:女性与A型急性主动脉夹层术后不良预后之间的关系已有报道;然而,B型急性主动脉夹层(包括典型主动脉夹层和壁内血肿)的临床特征和住院结果的性别相关差异仍有待阐明。方法和结果我们研究了2372例在东京急性主动脉超级网络注册的B型急性主动脉夹层患者。女性比男性少且年龄大(年龄中位数[四分位数间距]:76岁[66-84岁],n=695;P < 0.001)。女性到主动脉中心的时间比男性晚。女性的壁内血肿比例更高(63.7%比53.7%,P<0.001),接受医疗治疗的频率更高(90.9%比86.3%,P=0.002),终末器官灌注不良发生率更低(2.4%比5.7%,P<0.001),住院死亡率更高(5.3%比2.7%,P=0.002)。在多变量分析中,年龄(每年,优势比[OR], 1.06 [95% CI, 1.03-1.08];P<0.001),高脂血症(OR, 2.09 [95% CI, 1.13-3.88];P=0.019),无痛(OR, 2.59 [95% CI, 1.14-5.89];P=0.023),休克/低血压(OR, 2.93 [95% CI, 1.21-7.11];P=0.017),非壁内血肿(OR, 2.31 [95% CI, 1.32-4.05];P=0.004),主动脉破裂(OR, 26.6 [95% CI, 14.1-50.0];P<0.001),终末器官灌注不良(OR, 4.61 [95% CI, 2.11-10.1];P<0.001)与较高的住院死亡率相关,但与女性无关(OR, 1.67 [95% CI, 0.96-2.91];P = 0.072)。结论:B型急性主动脉夹层女性患者年龄较大,壁内血肿较多,终末器官灌注不良发生率较低,住院死亡率高于男性。然而,在多变量调整后,女性与院内死亡率无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信