Space Syntax's Relation to Seating Choices from an Evolutionary Approach

Barbara Keszei, Balint G. Halász, Anna Losonczi, A. Dúll
{"title":"Space Syntax's Relation to Seating Choices from an Evolutionary Approach","authors":"Barbara Keszei, Balint G. Halász, Anna Losonczi, A. Dúll","doi":"10.3311/ppar.14251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Space syntax provides information on the probabilities of certain behaviour types (e.g., seating choice, movement) depending on the configuration of space. The evolutionary approach (e.g. Appleton’s prospect-refuge theory) in environmental psychology can help designers in creating spaces by providing a better understanding why certain parts of an open space or a building are avoided or occupied, why good \"observation points\" or \"hiding places” are preferred. Our research aimed to explore how different space syntax variables predict specific behaviours – the seating choices of 216 participants – in a 3D virtual model of a lounge area and how the prospect-refuge theory relates to these predictions. The participants had to choose a seat in simulated spaces in two social situations, which differed in the degree of focused work and concentration: one of the situations implied seeing others and being seen, while the other highlighted focused work and hiding. The results show that there was a variation in the seating choices depending on the goal of the situation (user: trying to be seen or hiding). The expected significant correlations with the space syntax measurements were presented in the situations where being seen was the goal of the participants. However, in the situations where hiding was induced, our results need further clarification. Our future goal is to provide quantitative, evidence-based reflection on the prospect-refuge and space syntax theories, and to investigate the psychological factors (e.g., goal of the user) that need further consideration when applying these theories in the design practice.","PeriodicalId":33684,"journal":{"name":"Periodica Polytechnica Architecture","volume":"5 1","pages":"115-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Periodica Polytechnica Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3311/ppar.14251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Space syntax provides information on the probabilities of certain behaviour types (e.g., seating choice, movement) depending on the configuration of space. The evolutionary approach (e.g. Appleton’s prospect-refuge theory) in environmental psychology can help designers in creating spaces by providing a better understanding why certain parts of an open space or a building are avoided or occupied, why good "observation points" or "hiding places” are preferred. Our research aimed to explore how different space syntax variables predict specific behaviours – the seating choices of 216 participants – in a 3D virtual model of a lounge area and how the prospect-refuge theory relates to these predictions. The participants had to choose a seat in simulated spaces in two social situations, which differed in the degree of focused work and concentration: one of the situations implied seeing others and being seen, while the other highlighted focused work and hiding. The results show that there was a variation in the seating choices depending on the goal of the situation (user: trying to be seen or hiding). The expected significant correlations with the space syntax measurements were presented in the situations where being seen was the goal of the participants. However, in the situations where hiding was induced, our results need further clarification. Our future goal is to provide quantitative, evidence-based reflection on the prospect-refuge and space syntax theories, and to investigate the psychological factors (e.g., goal of the user) that need further consideration when applying these theories in the design practice.
从演化的角度看空间句法与座位选择的关系
空间语法提供了特定行为类型(例如,座位选择,移动)的概率信息,这取决于空间的配置。环境心理学中的进化方法(如Appleton的前景-避难所理论)可以帮助设计师更好地理解为什么开放空间或建筑的某些部分被避开或占用,为什么好的“观察点”或“藏身之地”是首选,从而创造空间。我们的研究旨在探索不同的空间语法变量如何预测特定行为- 216名参与者的座位选择-在休息区的3D虚拟模型中,以及前景避难所理论如何与这些预测相关联。参与者必须在两种不同的社交情境中选择一个模拟空间的座位,这两种情境的专注程度不同:一种情境意味着看到别人和被人看到,而另一种情境则强调专注工作和隐藏。结果表明,根据情况的目标(用户:试图被看到或隐藏),座位的选择有所不同。在参与者的目标是被看到的情况下,与空间语法测量的预期显著相关性被呈现出来。然而,在诱导隐藏的情况下,我们的结果需要进一步澄清。我们未来的目标是对前景庇护和空间句法理论进行定量的、循证的反思,并探讨在设计实践中应用这些理论时需要进一步考虑的心理因素(如用户的目标)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信