Mothers’ return-to-work reasons and work–family conflict: does a partner involved in childcare make a difference?

IF 1.5 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Sanna Moilanen, Eija Räikkönen, Maarit Alasuutari
{"title":"Mothers’ return-to-work reasons and work–family conflict: does a partner involved in childcare make a difference?","authors":"Sanna Moilanen, Eija Räikkönen, Maarit Alasuutari","doi":"10.1080/13668803.2021.2009441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Facilitating mothers’ work–family reconciliation upon their return to work can be considered a viable means of enhancing women’s overall employment participation. This study examined return-to-work reasons among mothers with a one-year-old child, how these reasons are related to mothers’ background characteristics, work-to-family conflict (WFC) and family-to-work conflict (FWC) and whether having a partner home caring for the child protects against such conflicts. Results based on survey data collected from Finnish working mothers (N = 573) in 2016 showed four dimensions of return-to-work reasons: personal importance of work, work- and career-related worries, dissatisfaction with stay-at-home mothering and convenient work/childcare conditions. Higher personal importance of work was associated with lower levels of WFC and FWC, whereas higher work- and career-related worries were related to higher WFC and FWC. Higher dissatisfaction with stay-at-home mothering was associated with higher WFC and higher convenient work/childcare conditions with lower WFC. Having a partner on care-related leave did not protect against the conflict.","PeriodicalId":47218,"journal":{"name":"Community Work & Family","volume":"294 1","pages":"444 - 465"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Work & Family","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2021.2009441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Facilitating mothers’ work–family reconciliation upon their return to work can be considered a viable means of enhancing women’s overall employment participation. This study examined return-to-work reasons among mothers with a one-year-old child, how these reasons are related to mothers’ background characteristics, work-to-family conflict (WFC) and family-to-work conflict (FWC) and whether having a partner home caring for the child protects against such conflicts. Results based on survey data collected from Finnish working mothers (N = 573) in 2016 showed four dimensions of return-to-work reasons: personal importance of work, work- and career-related worries, dissatisfaction with stay-at-home mothering and convenient work/childcare conditions. Higher personal importance of work was associated with lower levels of WFC and FWC, whereas higher work- and career-related worries were related to higher WFC and FWC. Higher dissatisfaction with stay-at-home mothering was associated with higher WFC and higher convenient work/childcare conditions with lower WFC. Having a partner on care-related leave did not protect against the conflict.
母亲重返工作岗位的原因和工作与家庭的冲突:一个参与照顾孩子的伴侣会产生影响吗?
促进母亲重返工作岗位后的工作与家庭协调可以被认为是提高妇女整体就业参与的可行手段。本研究调查了有一岁孩子的母亲重返工作岗位的原因,这些原因与母亲的背景特征、工作与家庭冲突(WFC)和家庭与工作冲突(FWC)之间的关系,以及是否有伴侣在家照顾孩子可以防止这种冲突。根据2016年对芬兰职业母亲(N = 573)的调查数据,结果显示了四个维度的重返工作原因:工作的个人重要性、与工作和职业相关的担忧、对全职母亲的不满以及方便的工作/育儿条件。较高的个人工作重要性与较低的WFC和FWC水平相关,而较高的工作和职业相关担忧与较高的WFC和FWC水平相关。对全职妈妈的不满程度越高,工作/育儿便利条件越高,工作/育儿便利条件越低。让伴侣休护理假并不能避免冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信