The morphology of periodic breathing in infants and adults

Zalman Weintraub , Don Cates , Kim Kwiatkowski , Khalid Al-Hathlol , Aamir Hussain , Henrique Rigatto
{"title":"The morphology of periodic breathing in infants and adults","authors":"Zalman Weintraub ,&nbsp;Don Cates ,&nbsp;Kim Kwiatkowski ,&nbsp;Khalid Al-Hathlol ,&nbsp;Aamir Hussain ,&nbsp;Henrique Rigatto","doi":"10.1016/S0034-5687(01)00249-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To test the hypothesis that the crescendo–decrescendo type of pattern of periodic breathing is more common in infants than in adulthood, we examined the morphologies of periodic breathing in four groups of subjects: group 1 (<em>n</em>=10, gestational age 30±1 week), group 2 (<em>n</em>=10, GA 31±1 week), group 3 (<em>n</em>=10, GA 38±1 week), and group 4 (<em>n</em>=10, age 50±4 years). Respiratory pattern and ventilation were measured using a flow-through system. The breathing morphologies were defined according to the respiratory flow. We found (1) a predominant crescendo–decrescendo pattern in preterm infants (groups 1 and 2, &gt;50%) and this changed to a predominant decrescendo breathing in adults (group 4, 50%); (2) total breathing cycle and its phases did not change significantly among the neonatal groups, but they almost doubled in adult subjects; however, the number of breaths per breathing interval remained the same (crescendo–decrescendo) or less (flat and decrescendo) in adults as compared to preterm infants; (3) the duty cycle (breathing interval/cycle duration) remained consistent with age; and (4) at the beginning of each breathing interval, alveolar P<sub><span>co</span><sub><span>2</span></sub></sub> was highest and alveolar P<sub><span>o</span><sub>2</sub></sub> and O<sub>2</sub> saturation lowest. The findings suggest a change in the strategy of the respiratory control system during periodic breathing between the infant and the adult, perhaps dictated by mechanical and chemoreceptor limitations early in age, with a switch from a crescendo–decrescendo to a predominantly decrescendo pattern.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20976,"journal":{"name":"Respiration physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0034-5687(01)00249-3","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiration physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034568701002493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that the crescendo–decrescendo type of pattern of periodic breathing is more common in infants than in adulthood, we examined the morphologies of periodic breathing in four groups of subjects: group 1 (n=10, gestational age 30±1 week), group 2 (n=10, GA 31±1 week), group 3 (n=10, GA 38±1 week), and group 4 (n=10, age 50±4 years). Respiratory pattern and ventilation were measured using a flow-through system. The breathing morphologies were defined according to the respiratory flow. We found (1) a predominant crescendo–decrescendo pattern in preterm infants (groups 1 and 2, >50%) and this changed to a predominant decrescendo breathing in adults (group 4, 50%); (2) total breathing cycle and its phases did not change significantly among the neonatal groups, but they almost doubled in adult subjects; however, the number of breaths per breathing interval remained the same (crescendo–decrescendo) or less (flat and decrescendo) in adults as compared to preterm infants; (3) the duty cycle (breathing interval/cycle duration) remained consistent with age; and (4) at the beginning of each breathing interval, alveolar Pco2 was highest and alveolar Po2 and O2 saturation lowest. The findings suggest a change in the strategy of the respiratory control system during periodic breathing between the infant and the adult, perhaps dictated by mechanical and chemoreceptor limitations early in age, with a switch from a crescendo–decrescendo to a predominantly decrescendo pattern.

婴儿和成人周期性呼吸的形态学
为了验证渐强-渐弱型周期性呼吸模式在婴儿中比成人更常见的假设,我们检查了四组受试者的周期性呼吸形态:1组(n=10,胎龄30±1周)、2组(n=10,胎龄31±1周)、3组(n=10,胎龄38±1周)和4组(n=10,胎龄50±4岁)。呼吸模式和通气性采用气流系统测量。根据呼吸流量定义呼吸形态。我们发现(1)在早产儿(第1组和第2组,50%)中以渐升-渐降模式为主,而在成人(第4组,50%)中则以渐降模式为主;(2)新生儿组总呼吸周期及其阶段变化不显著,但成人组呼吸周期变化几乎翻倍;然而,与早产儿相比,成人每次呼吸间隔的呼吸次数保持不变(渐增-渐减)或更少(平缓和渐减);(3)占空比(呼吸间隔/周期持续时间)与年龄保持一致;(4)各呼吸间隔开始时肺泡Pco2最高,肺泡Po2和O2饱和度最低。研究结果表明,在婴儿和成人的周期性呼吸过程中,呼吸控制系统的策略发生了变化,这可能是由早期的机械和化学感受器限制所决定的,从渐强-渐弱模式转变为主要的渐弱模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信