Effect of virus inactivation on weak positive results of nucleic acid test for 2019 novel coronavirus

Q4 Health Professions
Xiuzhi Duan, Xuchu Wang, Pan Yu, Weiwei Liu, Xiang Li, Lele Zhang, Gong Zhang, Huqiang Tang, Qin Chen, Xianguo Wu, Zhihua Tao
{"title":"Effect of virus inactivation on weak positive results of nucleic acid test for 2019 novel coronavirus","authors":"Xiuzhi Duan, Xuchu Wang, Pan Yu, Weiwei Liu, Xiang Li, Lele Zhang, Gong Zhang, Huqiang Tang, Qin Chen, Xianguo Wu, Zhihua Tao","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.CN114452-20200227-00138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the effect of virus inactivation on weak positive result of 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) nucleic acid test. \n \n \nMethod \nA retrospective study was conducted on the nasopharyngeal swabs of three patients with positive PCR nucleic acid test for Novel Coronavirus at different concentrations in the Second affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University Medical College from January to February 2020.The virus in nasopharyngeal swab specimens were inactivated by water bath at 56 ℃ for 30 min, dry bath at 56 ℃ for 60 min and dry bath at 60 ℃ for 30 min respectively. After treatment, the sample RNA were extracted and then detected by three new commercial quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction reagent kits for 2019-nCoV.Cycle threshold(Ct)value was used to evaluate the effect of virus inactivation on nucleic acid detection of 2019-nCoV. \n \n \nResults \nThere was no significant difference between the groups before and after inactivation. Ct values of ORF1ab gene before inactivation were 23.28±0.28, 25.25±0.25, 28.93±0.44, 32.06±0.47, 35.20±0.38, 32.89±0.38, 36.24±0.23, 33.30±0.46, and those after inactivation were, group 1:23.60±0.20, 27.29±0.30, 31.83±0.51, 37.41±0.46, group 2:24.25±0.34, 27.18±0.42, 31.84±0.61, 34.99±1.01, 34.89±0.45,group 3:23.37±0.17, 26.89±0.52, 32.05±0.50.Ct value of N gene before inactivation were24.38±0.09, 26.64±0.11, 30.35±0.12, 33.29±0.33, 36.93±0.11, 34.50±0.12, 35.63±0.12, those after inactivation were, group 1:24.66 ±0.11, 28.52±0.14, 32.71±0.14, 37.00±0.13.group 2:25.41 ±0.10, 28.79±0.15, 33.29±0.28. group 3:23.37±0.11, 28.68±0.11, 33.54±0.13, 37.18±0.23(ORF1ab gene: t =-1.416; N gene: t=-1.379, P> 0.05). There was no significant difference amongthe three inactivation groups, the specific Ct values are shown above(ORF1ab gene: t =-0.460; N gene: t =-0.132, P>0.05). However, the Ct values of the inactivated groups (1,2,3) and the non-inactivated group at different dilution times were different (10 ×:Ct value of ORF1abwas 25.25±0.25 in the non-inactivated group, and 27.29±0.30, 27.18±0.42 and 26.89±0.52 in the inactivated group1,2 and 3.t (ORF1ab) = -7.327, P 0.05) and among the three reagents(reagent 1:7/11, 4/11, 3/11, 3/11, reagent 2:8/11, 4/11, 3/11, 3/11, reagent 3:5/11, 3/11, 3/11, 2/11)(χ2=1.199, P>0.05). \n \n \nConclusion \nThe virus inactivation can degrade the nucleic acid of the 2019nCoV, resulting in the decrease of the Ct value and the false negative results of the low-concentration specimens. \n \n \nKey words: \nCoronavirus; Virus inactivation; Nucleic acids; False negative reactions; Real-time polymerase chain reaction","PeriodicalId":10096,"journal":{"name":"中华检验医学杂志","volume":"106 1","pages":"358-363"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华检验医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN114452-20200227-00138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective To investigate the effect of virus inactivation on weak positive result of 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) nucleic acid test. Method A retrospective study was conducted on the nasopharyngeal swabs of three patients with positive PCR nucleic acid test for Novel Coronavirus at different concentrations in the Second affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University Medical College from January to February 2020.The virus in nasopharyngeal swab specimens were inactivated by water bath at 56 ℃ for 30 min, dry bath at 56 ℃ for 60 min and dry bath at 60 ℃ for 30 min respectively. After treatment, the sample RNA were extracted and then detected by three new commercial quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction reagent kits for 2019-nCoV.Cycle threshold(Ct)value was used to evaluate the effect of virus inactivation on nucleic acid detection of 2019-nCoV. Results There was no significant difference between the groups before and after inactivation. Ct values of ORF1ab gene before inactivation were 23.28±0.28, 25.25±0.25, 28.93±0.44, 32.06±0.47, 35.20±0.38, 32.89±0.38, 36.24±0.23, 33.30±0.46, and those after inactivation were, group 1:23.60±0.20, 27.29±0.30, 31.83±0.51, 37.41±0.46, group 2:24.25±0.34, 27.18±0.42, 31.84±0.61, 34.99±1.01, 34.89±0.45,group 3:23.37±0.17, 26.89±0.52, 32.05±0.50.Ct value of N gene before inactivation were24.38±0.09, 26.64±0.11, 30.35±0.12, 33.29±0.33, 36.93±0.11, 34.50±0.12, 35.63±0.12, those after inactivation were, group 1:24.66 ±0.11, 28.52±0.14, 32.71±0.14, 37.00±0.13.group 2:25.41 ±0.10, 28.79±0.15, 33.29±0.28. group 3:23.37±0.11, 28.68±0.11, 33.54±0.13, 37.18±0.23(ORF1ab gene: t =-1.416; N gene: t=-1.379, P> 0.05). There was no significant difference amongthe three inactivation groups, the specific Ct values are shown above(ORF1ab gene: t =-0.460; N gene: t =-0.132, P>0.05). However, the Ct values of the inactivated groups (1,2,3) and the non-inactivated group at different dilution times were different (10 ×:Ct value of ORF1abwas 25.25±0.25 in the non-inactivated group, and 27.29±0.30, 27.18±0.42 and 26.89±0.52 in the inactivated group1,2 and 3.t (ORF1ab) = -7.327, P 0.05) and among the three reagents(reagent 1:7/11, 4/11, 3/11, 3/11, reagent 2:8/11, 4/11, 3/11, 3/11, reagent 3:5/11, 3/11, 3/11, 2/11)(χ2=1.199, P>0.05). Conclusion The virus inactivation can degrade the nucleic acid of the 2019nCoV, resulting in the decrease of the Ct value and the false negative results of the low-concentration specimens. Key words: Coronavirus; Virus inactivation; Nucleic acids; False negative reactions; Real-time polymerase chain reaction
病毒灭活对新型冠状病毒核酸检测弱阳性结果的影响
目的探讨病毒灭活对新型冠状病毒(2019- ncov)核酸检测弱阳性的影响。方法对2020年1 - 2月浙江大学医学院第二附属医院不同浓度新型冠状病毒PCR核酸检测阳性的3例患者鼻咽拭子进行回顾性研究。用56℃水浴30 min、56℃干浴60 min和60℃干浴30 min灭活鼻咽拭子标本中的病毒。处理后,提取样品RNA,采用新型新型新型商用实时定量聚合酶链反应试剂盒进行检测。采用周期阈值(Ct)评价病毒灭活对新型冠状病毒核酸检测的影响。结果灭活前后两组间差异无统计学意义。ORF1ab基因失活前的Ct值分别为23.28±0.28、25.25±0.25、28.93±0.44、32.06±0.47、35.20±0.38、32.89±0.38、36.24±0.23、33.30±0.46,失活后的Ct值分别为1:23.60±0.20、27.29±0.30、31.83±0.51、37.41±0.46,2:24.25±0.34、27.18±0.42、31.84±0.61、34.99±1.01、34.89±0.45,3:23.37±0.17、26.89±0.52、32.05±0.50。N基因失活前的Ct值分别为24.38±0.09、26.64±0.11、30.35±0.12、33.29±0.33、36.93±0.11、34.50±0.12、35.63±0.12,失活后的Ct值分别为:24.66±0.11、28.52±0.14、32.71±0.14、37.00±0.13。组:25.41±0.10,28.79±0.15,33.29±0.28。组3:23.37±0.11,28.68±0.11,33.54±0.13,37.18±0.23(ORF1ab基因:t =-1.416;N基因:t=-1.379, P> 0.05)。三个失活组间差异无统计学意义,特异性Ct值见上表(ORF1ab基因:t =-0.460;N基因:t =-0.132, P>0.05)。但不同稀释倍数下灭活组(1、2、3)与未灭活组的Ct值不同(10倍:未灭活组的orf1abct值为25.25±0.25,灭活组1、2、3的orf1abct值为27.29±0.30、27.18±0.42、26.89±0.52)。t (ORF1ab) = -7.327, P < 0.05),试剂1∶7/11、4/11、3/ 11,3 /11、试剂2∶8/11、4/11、3/ 11,3 /11、试剂3∶5/11、3/ 11,3 / 11,2 /11间差异有统计学意义(χ2=1.199, P>0.05)。结论病毒灭活可使新型冠状病毒核酸降解,导致低浓度标本Ct值降低,出现假阴性结果。关键词:冠状病毒;病毒失活;核酸;虚假负面反应;实时聚合酶链反应
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华检验医学杂志
中华检验医学杂志 Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8037
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信