Morphometric and quantitative evaluation of the gastroepiploic artery.

Kodai Tomioka, M. Murakami, Akira Saito, H. Ezure, H. Moriyama, Ryoichi Mori, N. Otsuka
{"title":"Morphometric and quantitative evaluation of the gastroepiploic artery.","authors":"Kodai Tomioka, M. Murakami, Akira Saito, H. Ezure, H. Moriyama, Ryoichi Mori, N. Otsuka","doi":"10.2535/ofaj.92.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND The gastroepiploic artery (GEA) has been described in various ways by anatomical texts and surgical manuals. Currently, there are no studies that have investigated the thickness and length of GEA using gross anatomical methods. In the present study, we measured the length, circumference, area, and major axis of GEA, and quantitatively evaluated the differences between right and left GEA (RGEA and LGEA), using gross anatomical and morphometric methods for the first time. MATERIALS AND METHOD Seventeen cadavers were selected. The median age of the cadavers was 82 years. We observed and evaluated GEA with naked eyes, as well as under a stereoscopic microscope. RESULTS RGEA was significantly longer than LGEA (p < 0.0001). The mean length of RGEA and LGEA were 26.51 ± 5.15 cm and 14.05 ± 3.12 cm, respectively. The mean area of RGEA, LGEA, and the anastomotic point were 3.31 ± 1.71 mm(2), 1.33 ± 1.01 mm(2), and 0.51 ± 0.28 mm(2) respectively. CONCLUSION RGEA was significantly longer and thicker than LGEA. The results also showed that in almost all of the cases RGEA and LGEA anastomosed with each other and grew thinner as they approached the middle of the greater curvature of the stomach.","PeriodicalId":19462,"journal":{"name":"Okajimas folia anatomica Japonica","volume":"68 1","pages":"33-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Okajimas folia anatomica Japonica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2535/ofaj.92.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

BACKGROUND The gastroepiploic artery (GEA) has been described in various ways by anatomical texts and surgical manuals. Currently, there are no studies that have investigated the thickness and length of GEA using gross anatomical methods. In the present study, we measured the length, circumference, area, and major axis of GEA, and quantitatively evaluated the differences between right and left GEA (RGEA and LGEA), using gross anatomical and morphometric methods for the first time. MATERIALS AND METHOD Seventeen cadavers were selected. The median age of the cadavers was 82 years. We observed and evaluated GEA with naked eyes, as well as under a stereoscopic microscope. RESULTS RGEA was significantly longer than LGEA (p < 0.0001). The mean length of RGEA and LGEA were 26.51 ± 5.15 cm and 14.05 ± 3.12 cm, respectively. The mean area of RGEA, LGEA, and the anastomotic point were 3.31 ± 1.71 mm(2), 1.33 ± 1.01 mm(2), and 0.51 ± 0.28 mm(2) respectively. CONCLUSION RGEA was significantly longer and thicker than LGEA. The results also showed that in almost all of the cases RGEA and LGEA anastomosed with each other and grew thinner as they approached the middle of the greater curvature of the stomach.
胃网膜动脉的形态计量学和定量评价。
背景:胃网膜动脉(GEA)在解剖文献和手术手册中有多种描述。目前,还没有采用大体解剖方法对GEA的厚度和长度进行研究。本研究首次采用大体解剖学和形态计量学方法,测量了GEA的长度、周长、面积和长轴,并定量评价了左右GEA (RGEA和LGEA)的差异。材料与方法选取17具尸体。这些尸体的平均年龄为82岁。我们用肉眼和立体显微镜观察和评价GEA。结果rgea明显长于LGEA (p < 0.0001)。RGEA和LGEA的平均长度分别为26.51±5.15 cm和14.05±3.12 cm。RGEA、LGEA及吻合点的平均面积分别为3.31±1.71 mm(2)、1.33±1.01 mm(2)、0.51±0.28 mm(2)。结论rgea较LGEA明显更长、更厚。结果还表明,在几乎所有的病例中,RGEA和LGEA相互吻合,并随着它们接近胃大弯曲的中间而变薄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信