Microglial P2 Purinergic Receptor and Immunomodulatory Gene Transcripts Vary By Region, Sex, and Age in the Healthy Mouse CNS.

J. Crain, J. Watters
{"title":"Microglial P2 Purinergic Receptor and Immunomodulatory Gene Transcripts Vary By Region, Sex, and Age in the Healthy Mouse CNS.","authors":"J. Crain, J. Watters","doi":"10.4172/2329-8936.1000124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inflammatory damage in many neurodegenerative diseases is restricted to certain regions of the CNS, and while microglia have long been implicated in the pathology of many of these disorders, information comparing their gene expression in different CNS regions is lacking. Here we tested the hypothesis that the expression of purinergic receptors, estrogen receptors and other neuroprotective and pro-inflammatory genes differed among CNS regions in healthy mice. Because neurodegenerative diseases vary in incidence by sex and age, we also examined the regional distribution of these genes in male and female mice of four different ages between 21 days and 12 months. We postulated that pro-inflammatory gene expression would be higher in older animals, and lower in young adult females. We found that microglial gene expression differed across the CNS. Estrogen receptor alpha (Esr1) mRNA levels were often lower in microglia from the brainstem/spinal cord than from the cortex, whereas tumor necrosis factor alpha (Tnfα) expression was several times higher. In addition, the regional pattern of gene expression often changed with animal age; for example, no regional differences in P2X7 mRNA levels were detected in 21 day-old animals, but at 7 weeks and older, expression was highest in cerebellar microglia. Lastly, the expression of some genes was sexually dimorphic. In microglia from 12 month-old animals, mRNA levels of inducible nitric oxide synthase, but not Tnfα, were higher in females than males. These data suggest that microglial gene expression is not uniformly more pro-inflammatory in males or older animals. Moreover, microglia from CNS regions in which neuronal damage predominates in neurodegenerative disease do not generally express more pro-inflammatory genes than microglia from regions less frequently affected. This study provides an in-depth assessment of regional-, sex- and age-dependent differences in key microglial transcripts from the healthy mouse CNS.","PeriodicalId":90374,"journal":{"name":"Transcriptomics: open access","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transcriptomics: open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-8936.1000124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

Inflammatory damage in many neurodegenerative diseases is restricted to certain regions of the CNS, and while microglia have long been implicated in the pathology of many of these disorders, information comparing their gene expression in different CNS regions is lacking. Here we tested the hypothesis that the expression of purinergic receptors, estrogen receptors and other neuroprotective and pro-inflammatory genes differed among CNS regions in healthy mice. Because neurodegenerative diseases vary in incidence by sex and age, we also examined the regional distribution of these genes in male and female mice of four different ages between 21 days and 12 months. We postulated that pro-inflammatory gene expression would be higher in older animals, and lower in young adult females. We found that microglial gene expression differed across the CNS. Estrogen receptor alpha (Esr1) mRNA levels were often lower in microglia from the brainstem/spinal cord than from the cortex, whereas tumor necrosis factor alpha (Tnfα) expression was several times higher. In addition, the regional pattern of gene expression often changed with animal age; for example, no regional differences in P2X7 mRNA levels were detected in 21 day-old animals, but at 7 weeks and older, expression was highest in cerebellar microglia. Lastly, the expression of some genes was sexually dimorphic. In microglia from 12 month-old animals, mRNA levels of inducible nitric oxide synthase, but not Tnfα, were higher in females than males. These data suggest that microglial gene expression is not uniformly more pro-inflammatory in males or older animals. Moreover, microglia from CNS regions in which neuronal damage predominates in neurodegenerative disease do not generally express more pro-inflammatory genes than microglia from regions less frequently affected. This study provides an in-depth assessment of regional-, sex- and age-dependent differences in key microglial transcripts from the healthy mouse CNS.
在健康小鼠中枢神经系统中,小胶质P2嘌呤能受体和免疫调节基因转录物因地区、性别和年龄而异。
许多神经退行性疾病的炎症损伤局限于中枢神经系统的某些区域,虽然小胶质细胞长期以来与许多这些疾病的病理有关,但缺乏比较它们在不同中枢神经系统区域的基因表达的信息。在这里,我们验证了嘌呤能受体、雌激素受体和其他神经保护和促炎基因在健康小鼠中枢神经系统区域的表达差异的假设。由于神经退行性疾病的发病率因性别和年龄而异,我们还在21天至12个月的四个不同年龄的雄性和雌性小鼠中检测了这些基因的区域分布。我们假设促炎基因表达在老年动物中较高,而在年轻成年雌性动物中较低。我们发现中枢神经系统的小胶质细胞基因表达不同。雌激素受体α (Esr1) mRNA水平在脑干/脊髓的小胶质细胞中通常低于皮层,而肿瘤坏死因子α (Tnfα)的表达则高出数倍。此外,基因表达的区域模式经常随着动物年龄的变化而变化;例如,在21日龄的动物中没有检测到P2X7 mRNA水平的区域差异,但在7周龄及更大时,小脑小胶质细胞中的表达最高。最后,一些基因的表达是两性二态的。在12月龄动物的小胶质细胞中,雌性诱导型一氧化氮合酶mRNA水平高于雄性,而非Tnfα水平。这些数据表明,在雄性或老年动物中,小胶质细胞基因表达并不一致地更具促炎性。此外,来自神经退行性疾病中神经元损伤占主导地位的中枢神经系统区域的小胶质细胞通常不会比来自较少受影响区域的小胶质细胞表达更多的促炎基因。本研究对健康小鼠中枢神经系统中关键小胶质转录物的区域、性别和年龄依赖性差异进行了深入评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信