Airport congestion and near-midair collisions

Jonathan L. Gifford, Praveen Sinha
{"title":"Airport congestion and near-midair collisions","authors":"Jonathan L. Gifford,&nbsp;Praveen Sinha","doi":"10.1016/0191-2607(91)90128-D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents a model that systematically integrates, for the first time, the association between a region's aviation near-midair collision risk and its traffic levels, its type and amount of air traffic control, and the complexity of its airspace. The model incorporates the tight interrelatedness (and correlation) between traffic, airspace complexity, and air traffic controller staffing. An estimation of the model using cross-sectional data on 143 U.S. airports in 1985 indicates that the frequency of reported near-midair collisions (NMACs) is positively associated with regional traffic and airspace complexity, despite the fact that busier, more complex regions generally have more air traffic controllers. Also, in regions governed by “terminal radar service areas” (TRSAs), the reported near-midair collisions are positively associated with the presence of more satellite airports than would be expected on the basis of traffic alone. Finally, deviations from controller staffing levels that would be expected on the basis of traffic and airspace complexity alone are significantly associated with variations in reported NMACs in terminal control areas but not in terminal radar service areas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101260,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A: General","volume":"25 2","pages":"Pages 91-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0191-2607(91)90128-D","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A: General","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/019126079190128D","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This paper presents a model that systematically integrates, for the first time, the association between a region's aviation near-midair collision risk and its traffic levels, its type and amount of air traffic control, and the complexity of its airspace. The model incorporates the tight interrelatedness (and correlation) between traffic, airspace complexity, and air traffic controller staffing. An estimation of the model using cross-sectional data on 143 U.S. airports in 1985 indicates that the frequency of reported near-midair collisions (NMACs) is positively associated with regional traffic and airspace complexity, despite the fact that busier, more complex regions generally have more air traffic controllers. Also, in regions governed by “terminal radar service areas” (TRSAs), the reported near-midair collisions are positively associated with the presence of more satellite airports than would be expected on the basis of traffic alone. Finally, deviations from controller staffing levels that would be expected on the basis of traffic and airspace complexity alone are significantly associated with variations in reported NMACs in terminal control areas but not in terminal radar service areas.

机场拥堵和近空中碰撞
本文首次提出了一个模型,该模型系统地集成了一个地区的航空近半空碰撞风险与其交通水平、空中交通管制的类型和数量以及空域复杂性之间的关系。该模型结合了交通、空域复杂性和空中交通管制人员配置之间的紧密相互关系(和相关性)。利用1985年143个美国机场的横截面数据对该模型进行的估计表明,尽管更繁忙、更复杂的地区通常有更多的空中交通管制员,但报告的近半空碰撞(nmac)的频率与区域交通和空域复杂性正相关。此外,在由“终端雷达服务区”(trsa)管辖的区域,报告的近半空碰撞与卫星机场的存在呈正相关,而不是仅根据交通情况所预期的。最后,仅根据交通和空域复杂性预期的管制员人员配备水平的偏差与终端控制区报告的nmac变化显著相关,但与终端雷达服务区无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信