{"title":"Association between Perceived Daylit Area and Self-reported Frequency of Electric Lighting Use in Multi-dwelling Buildings","authors":"I. Bournas","doi":"10.1080/15502724.2020.1851606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper examines the association between daytime electric lighting use and perceived indoor daylight availability in residential spaces. In addition, occupant preferences were evaluated, in particular which rooms are prioritized in terms of daylight availability. The study deployed a questionnaire survey that was carried out in typical multi-dwelling apartment blocks in Malmö, Sweden (Latitude: 55.6 °N). Occupants were asked to report how often they use electric lighting during daylight hours (EL) in their kitchen, living room and main bedroom, and how much of the floor area they perceive as adequately daylit (DA) throughout the year. Responses EL and DA were measured in seven-point semantic differential scales, and were correlated (Spearman) to evaluate their association for different room groups. Groups were based on age, room function, façade orientation, balcony obstruction and fenestration geometry. In addition, occupants were asked which room they would choose if there had to be one underlit room. Results indicate that EL is strongly associated with DA in the overall room sample (rS = −0.588, p < .01, n = 225). The association is persistent across room groups of different characteristics, with the Spearman rank correlation coefficient ranging between −0.4 and −0.8, and not differing significantly between groups. In terms of preferences, a significantly high proportion of participants would choose the bedroom if there had to be one underlit room (62%, p < .05), while the kitchen was selected by only 5 out of 108 respondents.","PeriodicalId":49911,"journal":{"name":"Leukos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukos","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2020.1851606","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper examines the association between daytime electric lighting use and perceived indoor daylight availability in residential spaces. In addition, occupant preferences were evaluated, in particular which rooms are prioritized in terms of daylight availability. The study deployed a questionnaire survey that was carried out in typical multi-dwelling apartment blocks in Malmö, Sweden (Latitude: 55.6 °N). Occupants were asked to report how often they use electric lighting during daylight hours (EL) in their kitchen, living room and main bedroom, and how much of the floor area they perceive as adequately daylit (DA) throughout the year. Responses EL and DA were measured in seven-point semantic differential scales, and were correlated (Spearman) to evaluate their association for different room groups. Groups were based on age, room function, façade orientation, balcony obstruction and fenestration geometry. In addition, occupants were asked which room they would choose if there had to be one underlit room. Results indicate that EL is strongly associated with DA in the overall room sample (rS = −0.588, p < .01, n = 225). The association is persistent across room groups of different characteristics, with the Spearman rank correlation coefficient ranging between −0.4 and −0.8, and not differing significantly between groups. In terms of preferences, a significantly high proportion of participants would choose the bedroom if there had to be one underlit room (62%, p < .05), while the kitchen was selected by only 5 out of 108 respondents.
期刊介绍:
The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America and our publisher Taylor & Francis make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the "Content") contained in our publications. However, The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America and our publisher Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America and our publisher Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America and our publisher Taylor & Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to, or arising out of the use of the Content. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions .