3D Geomechanical Modeling for Wellbore Stability Analysis: Starfish, ECMA, Trinidad and Tobago

Rashad Ramjohn, T. Gan, M. Sarfare
{"title":"3D Geomechanical Modeling for Wellbore Stability Analysis: Starfish, ECMA, Trinidad and Tobago","authors":"Rashad Ramjohn, T. Gan, M. Sarfare","doi":"10.2118/191242-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Conventionally, a calibrated 1D geomechanical model is used to define the mud weight window required for the successful drilling and completion of a well. Utilizing depth stretch functionality, estimated rock properties and subsurface stresses, are ‘stretched’ from the corresponding offset well to the proposed well to be drilled. This approach will only suffice if the geological structure and wellbore trajectory are relatively simple. Even so, optimizing wellbore placement becomes an arduous exercise when using 1D geomechanical models because the workflow must be repeated for each new iteration of the proposed wellbore trajectory. Furthermore, as the geological structure and wellbore trajectory increases in complexity, severe distortion in topological properties, such as overburden stress and pore pressure, can render the one-dimensional solution inapplicable.\n In such circumstances, a calibrated 3D geomechanical model can be used. This paper introduces a generic workflow for developing a calibrated 3D geomechanical model that can be used for wellbore stability analysis. The workflow incorporates calibrated 1D geomechanical models and existing static geological modeling outputs, such as structural surfaces and facies model, to constrain the distribution of topological and primary properties within a 3D structural framework. The applicability of the workflow will be demonstrated by presenting the results of a case study from the Starfish field, ECMA, offshore Trinidad. It is intended for this paper to serve as a reference to geoscientists and engineers involved in brownfield and greenfield development planning. By extension, subsurface professionals who are involved in integrated reservoir modeling may also benefit from the work presented since geomechanics is often omitted from the modelling workflow.","PeriodicalId":11006,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, June 27, 2018","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, June 27, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191242-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Conventionally, a calibrated 1D geomechanical model is used to define the mud weight window required for the successful drilling and completion of a well. Utilizing depth stretch functionality, estimated rock properties and subsurface stresses, are ‘stretched’ from the corresponding offset well to the proposed well to be drilled. This approach will only suffice if the geological structure and wellbore trajectory are relatively simple. Even so, optimizing wellbore placement becomes an arduous exercise when using 1D geomechanical models because the workflow must be repeated for each new iteration of the proposed wellbore trajectory. Furthermore, as the geological structure and wellbore trajectory increases in complexity, severe distortion in topological properties, such as overburden stress and pore pressure, can render the one-dimensional solution inapplicable. In such circumstances, a calibrated 3D geomechanical model can be used. This paper introduces a generic workflow for developing a calibrated 3D geomechanical model that can be used for wellbore stability analysis. The workflow incorporates calibrated 1D geomechanical models and existing static geological modeling outputs, such as structural surfaces and facies model, to constrain the distribution of topological and primary properties within a 3D structural framework. The applicability of the workflow will be demonstrated by presenting the results of a case study from the Starfish field, ECMA, offshore Trinidad. It is intended for this paper to serve as a reference to geoscientists and engineers involved in brownfield and greenfield development planning. By extension, subsurface professionals who are involved in integrated reservoir modeling may also benefit from the work presented since geomechanics is often omitted from the modelling workflow.
用于井筒稳定性分析的三维地质力学建模:Starfish, ECMA, Trinidad和Tobago
通常,使用校准的一维地质力学模型来定义成功钻井和完井所需的泥浆比重窗口。利用深度拉伸功能,估计的岩石性质和地下应力,从相应的邻井“拉伸”到拟钻的井。这种方法只适用于地质构造和井眼轨迹相对简单的情况。即便如此,当使用1D地质力学模型时,优化井眼位置仍是一项艰巨的工作,因为对于所提出的井眼轨迹的每次新迭代,必须重复工作流程。此外,随着地质构造和井眼轨迹复杂性的增加,覆盖层应力和孔隙压力等拓扑性质的严重扭曲会使一维解变得不适用。在这种情况下,可以使用校准过的三维地质力学模型。本文介绍了一种开发可用于井筒稳定性分析的校准三维地质力学模型的通用工作流程。该工作流程结合了校准的1D地质力学模型和现有的静态地质建模输出,如结构表面和相模型,以在3D结构框架内约束拓扑和主要属性的分布。该工作流程的适用性将通过介绍特立尼达海上ECMA海星油田的案例研究结果来证明。本文旨在为参与棕地和绿地开发规划的地球科学家和工程师提供参考。此外,由于地质力学在建模工作流程中经常被忽略,因此参与油藏综合建模的地下专业人员也可以从本文中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信