Factorial exploration of the appropriation of academicscompetenciesand the accompanying needs of future teachers

IF 1 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
{"title":"Factorial exploration of the appropriation of academicscompetenciesand the accompanying needs of future teachers","authors":"","doi":"10.30534/ijns/2020/02962020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is conducted among students in training. Its objective is to analyse, through factorial exploration, students' perceptions of their levels of appropriation of academic competencies and their support needs. To this effect, an exploratory factorial analysis is carried out using data from asurvey composedof 12 dimensions and 62 statements. The latter measures 11 oral skills, 09 written skills, 08 practical skills and 12 parameters for asserting support needs. The factorial exploration determined 10 latent variables or factors. This was based on a sample of 147 participants F (n=53;36.1%) M (n=94;63.9%). The factor structure was examined under SPSS 21 using a maximum likelihood extraction method with Varimax axis rotation assuming moderate inter-factor correlations (Elliot and McGregor, 2001).Our results showed from this analysis the extraction of 10 factors explaining 74.38% of the total variance in the data on competencies required during training, as follows :Written Production (WP).This factor (relating to written competence) explained 6.52% of the variance. The analysis expresses a discrepancy of the items by (-.746 and .512). Participants tend to be less appropriate for compliance with instructions when they are able to organise themselves alone during investigative work or document exploration. Oral and Written Communication (OWC).This factor (relevant to oral competence) emerges with a 6.97% variance ratio and also included 2 items (Speaking in front of the audience, communicating ideas in writing to the teacher). The analysis expresses a variance indicated respectively by (.730 and -.711). The student's mastery of the oral situation does not therefore ensure the student's control of written expression or oral exchanges in a duel (student-teacher).Intensity of Effort and Artistic Expression (IEA).This factor (relating to physicalcompetence) accounted for 9.27% of the variance. The analysis expresses a discrepancy between the items. It is indicated respectively by (-.747 and .645). As a result, the ability to express intense effort is not at all favourable for artistic expression.As a result, intense physical effort is not compatible with grace and artistic expression. It has been found that the prior disparities between students (type of baccalaureate...) reveal pedagogical workcamps to be established later on during the readjustments of the different courses of study. According to these results, not all the participants have the same constraints or expectations in the curriculum of this training course.The declaratives representations on the appropriation of the competences identified, grouped and analysed, affirm that the so-called \"university\" or less professionally oriented courses are generally considered to be of little interest according to the conclusions of the participants Mean 2.54 ± sd .86, i.e. 45% n=67 of the interviewees. The assertions expressed in the results give rise to a measure of action, which is that of reviewing the theoretical side of the training, making it adequate and up to date in the movement of university changes and more precisely in the sciences and techniques of physical and sports activities (STAPS).","PeriodicalId":45170,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Communication Networks and Distributed Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Communication Networks and Distributed Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30534/ijns/2020/02962020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study is conducted among students in training. Its objective is to analyse, through factorial exploration, students' perceptions of their levels of appropriation of academic competencies and their support needs. To this effect, an exploratory factorial analysis is carried out using data from asurvey composedof 12 dimensions and 62 statements. The latter measures 11 oral skills, 09 written skills, 08 practical skills and 12 parameters for asserting support needs. The factorial exploration determined 10 latent variables or factors. This was based on a sample of 147 participants F (n=53;36.1%) M (n=94;63.9%). The factor structure was examined under SPSS 21 using a maximum likelihood extraction method with Varimax axis rotation assuming moderate inter-factor correlations (Elliot and McGregor, 2001).Our results showed from this analysis the extraction of 10 factors explaining 74.38% of the total variance in the data on competencies required during training, as follows :Written Production (WP).This factor (relating to written competence) explained 6.52% of the variance. The analysis expresses a discrepancy of the items by (-.746 and .512). Participants tend to be less appropriate for compliance with instructions when they are able to organise themselves alone during investigative work or document exploration. Oral and Written Communication (OWC).This factor (relevant to oral competence) emerges with a 6.97% variance ratio and also included 2 items (Speaking in front of the audience, communicating ideas in writing to the teacher). The analysis expresses a variance indicated respectively by (.730 and -.711). The student's mastery of the oral situation does not therefore ensure the student's control of written expression or oral exchanges in a duel (student-teacher).Intensity of Effort and Artistic Expression (IEA).This factor (relating to physicalcompetence) accounted for 9.27% of the variance. The analysis expresses a discrepancy between the items. It is indicated respectively by (-.747 and .645). As a result, the ability to express intense effort is not at all favourable for artistic expression.As a result, intense physical effort is not compatible with grace and artistic expression. It has been found that the prior disparities between students (type of baccalaureate...) reveal pedagogical workcamps to be established later on during the readjustments of the different courses of study. According to these results, not all the participants have the same constraints or expectations in the curriculum of this training course.The declaratives representations on the appropriation of the competences identified, grouped and analysed, affirm that the so-called "university" or less professionally oriented courses are generally considered to be of little interest according to the conclusions of the participants Mean 2.54 ± sd .86, i.e. 45% n=67 of the interviewees. The assertions expressed in the results give rise to a measure of action, which is that of reviewing the theoretical side of the training, making it adequate and up to date in the movement of university changes and more precisely in the sciences and techniques of physical and sports activities (STAPS).
未来教师学术能力的挪用及相关需求的析因探讨
本研究是在实习学生中进行的。其目的是通过析因探索,分析学生对其学术能力的挪用水平和支持需求的看法。为了达到这个效果,探索性的析因分析是使用从12个维度和62个陈述组成的调查数据进行的。后者测量了11项口头技能、09项书面技能、08项实践技能和12项支持需求断言参数。因子探索确定了10个潜在变量或因素。这是基于147名参与者的样本F (n=53;36.1%) M (n=94;63.9%)。因子结构在SPSS 21中使用最大似然提取方法进行检验,并假设变量轴旋转具有适度的因子间相关性(Elliot和McGregor, 2001)。我们的结果表明,从这个分析中提取的10个因素解释了培训期间所需能力数据的总方差的74.38%,如下:书面生产(WP)。这个因素(与书面能力有关)解释了6.52%的差异。分析用(-)表示项目的差异。746和。512)。当参与者在调查工作或文件探索中能够独自组织自己时,他们往往不太适合遵守指示。口头和书面沟通(OWC)。这个因素(与口语能力相关)以6.97%的方差率出现,还包括2个项目(在观众面前演讲,以书面形式与老师交流想法)。分析表达的方差分别由(表示。730和- 0.711)。因此,学生对口语情境的掌握并不能保证学生在决斗(师生)中对书面表达或口头交流的控制。努力强度和艺术表现(IEA)。这个因素(与身体能力有关)占方差的9.27%。分析表明项目之间存在差异。分别用(-)表示。747和。645)。因此,表达强烈努力的能力根本不利于艺术表现。因此,激烈的体力劳动与优雅和艺术表达是不相容的。人们已经发现,学生之间的先前差异(学士学位类型……)揭示了在不同学习课程的调整过程中,教学工作营地将在以后建立。根据这些结果,并不是所有的参与者都对这个培训课程有相同的约束或期望。根据参与者的结论,关于确定、分组和分析的能力占有的陈述性陈述肯定了所谓的“大学”或不太专业的课程通常被认为是不感兴趣的。结果中所表达的断言引起了一种行动措施,即审查训练的理论方面,使其在大学变革运动中,更确切地说,在体育活动的科学和技术(STAPS)中充分和最新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
46.20%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: IJCNDS aims to improve the state-of-the-art of worldwide research in communication networks and distributed systems and to address the various methodologies, tools, techniques, algorithms and results. It is not limited to networking issues in telecommunications; network problems in other application domains such as biological networks, social networks, and chemical networks will also be considered. This feature helps in promoting interdisciplinary research in these areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信