A comparative analysis of road and rail performance in freight transport: an example from Nigeria

IF 2.2
A. Daramola
{"title":"A comparative analysis of road and rail performance in freight transport: an example from Nigeria","authors":"A. Daramola","doi":"10.1080/21650020.2022.2033134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The research examines the implication of Nigeria’s lopsided land transport structure for performance and efficiency in the freight transport sector using the Lagos–Kano corridor as a case study. A comparative analysis of road and rail performance in freight transport using defined performance indicators shows that road transport performed better on all but two indicators, namely, freight ton-kilometres moved per vehicle hour travelled and throughput per unit of energy consumed. Other performance indicators such as absolute throughput of freight, freight ton-kilometres performed, speed, freight throughput per unit cost of operation and revenue per ton of freight moved favoured roads over rail. Clearly, rail comparative advantage relates to capacity, but freight shippers are looking for speed that shortens vehicle turnaround time. The lesson is that freight shippers will not explore modal comparative advantages (such as capacity and lower freight rates) except such advantages are complemented with competitiveness conferred by technology (especially speed).","PeriodicalId":90388,"journal":{"name":"Urban, planning and transport research","volume":"254 1","pages":"58 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban, planning and transport research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2022.2033134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The research examines the implication of Nigeria’s lopsided land transport structure for performance and efficiency in the freight transport sector using the Lagos–Kano corridor as a case study. A comparative analysis of road and rail performance in freight transport using defined performance indicators shows that road transport performed better on all but two indicators, namely, freight ton-kilometres moved per vehicle hour travelled and throughput per unit of energy consumed. Other performance indicators such as absolute throughput of freight, freight ton-kilometres performed, speed, freight throughput per unit cost of operation and revenue per ton of freight moved favoured roads over rail. Clearly, rail comparative advantage relates to capacity, but freight shippers are looking for speed that shortens vehicle turnaround time. The lesson is that freight shippers will not explore modal comparative advantages (such as capacity and lower freight rates) except such advantages are complemented with competitiveness conferred by technology (especially speed).
公路和铁路货物运输绩效的比较分析:以尼日利亚为例
摘要本研究以拉各斯-卡诺走廊为例,探讨了尼日利亚不平衡的陆路运输结构对货运部门绩效和效率的影响。利用确定的业绩指标对公路和铁路货运业绩进行比较分析表明,公路运输在除两个指标外的所有指标上都表现较好,这两个指标即每车辆每小时行驶的货运吨公里和每消耗能源单位的吞吐量。其他业绩指标,如货运的绝对吞吐量、完成的货运吨公里、速度、每单位运营成本的货运吞吐量和每吨货物的收入,都倾向于公路而不是铁路。显然,铁路的相对优势与运力有关,但货运商正在寻求能够缩短车辆周转时间的速度。教训是,货运托运人不会探索模式比较优势(如运力和较低的运费),除非这种优势与技术(尤其是速度)所赋予的竞争力相辅相成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书