Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Thoracocentesis on Clinical and Physiological Outcomes in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

M. Ammar
{"title":"Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Thoracocentesis on Clinical and Physiological Outcomes in Mechanically Ventilated Patients","authors":"M. Ammar","doi":"10.4172/2155-6148.1000784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pleural effusions are common in critically ill patients, causes are multifactorial. Mechanical ventilation and critical illness lead to disturbance of the normal physiological processes which regulate pleural fluid homeostasis. Ultrasound can detect small volume of pleural effusion up to 20 mL. \nAim of the work: We investigated the influence of large pleural effusion drainage on oxygenation, hemodynamics, and respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated patients. \nMethodology: We performed a prospective observational study on 65 mechanically ventilated patients examining the effects of large pleural fluid drainage on oxygenation; PaO2/FiO2 and Respiratory mechanics; peak inspiratory pressures, plateau pressures, dynamic compliance and total PEEP. Hemodynamics and complications also recorded at baseline, 6 h and 24 h after drainage. \nResults: Among 65 patients, the mean volume of effusion drained was (1868 ± 640) ml at 24 h. Uncomplicated pneumothorax occurred in two patients. When compared baseline; 6 h and 24 h after drainage,PaO2/FiO2 ratio significantly improved (196.69 ± 34.27, 227.02 ± 35.81, 269.78 ± 48.39; p<0.001), with a decrease in peak inspiratory pressure (38.23 ± 5.71, 34.14 ± 4.70, 29.89 ± 4.58 cm H2O, p<0.001) and plateau pressures (21.06 ± 3.47, 18.77 ± 3.17, 15.49 ± 2.91 cm H2O, p<0.001) and a large increase in dynamic compliance (17.48 ± 4.12, 21.79 ± 4.47, 26.77 ± 4.94 ml/cm H2O, p<0.001). Hemodynamics were not changed by drainage apart from respiratory rate which decreased significantly (19.4 ± 5.5, 17.4 ± 5, 16.5 ± 6.8 breaths/min, P=0.019). \nConclusions: Ultrasound pleural effusion drainage in mechanically ventilated patients is safe. It appears to ameliorate oxygenation and respiratory mechanics and reducing the respiratory rate without affecting hemodynamics.","PeriodicalId":15000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6148.1000784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pleural effusions are common in critically ill patients, causes are multifactorial. Mechanical ventilation and critical illness lead to disturbance of the normal physiological processes which regulate pleural fluid homeostasis. Ultrasound can detect small volume of pleural effusion up to 20 mL. Aim of the work: We investigated the influence of large pleural effusion drainage on oxygenation, hemodynamics, and respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated patients. Methodology: We performed a prospective observational study on 65 mechanically ventilated patients examining the effects of large pleural fluid drainage on oxygenation; PaO2/FiO2 and Respiratory mechanics; peak inspiratory pressures, plateau pressures, dynamic compliance and total PEEP. Hemodynamics and complications also recorded at baseline, 6 h and 24 h after drainage. Results: Among 65 patients, the mean volume of effusion drained was (1868 ± 640) ml at 24 h. Uncomplicated pneumothorax occurred in two patients. When compared baseline; 6 h and 24 h after drainage,PaO2/FiO2 ratio significantly improved (196.69 ± 34.27, 227.02 ± 35.81, 269.78 ± 48.39; p<0.001), with a decrease in peak inspiratory pressure (38.23 ± 5.71, 34.14 ± 4.70, 29.89 ± 4.58 cm H2O, p<0.001) and plateau pressures (21.06 ± 3.47, 18.77 ± 3.17, 15.49 ± 2.91 cm H2O, p<0.001) and a large increase in dynamic compliance (17.48 ± 4.12, 21.79 ± 4.47, 26.77 ± 4.94 ml/cm H2O, p<0.001). Hemodynamics were not changed by drainage apart from respiratory rate which decreased significantly (19.4 ± 5.5, 17.4 ± 5, 16.5 ± 6.8 breaths/min, P=0.019). Conclusions: Ultrasound pleural effusion drainage in mechanically ventilated patients is safe. It appears to ameliorate oxygenation and respiratory mechanics and reducing the respiratory rate without affecting hemodynamics.
超声引导下胸腔穿刺对机械通气患者临床及生理预后的影响
背景:胸腔积液常见于危重病人,其原因是多因素的。机械通气和危重疾病导致调节胸膜液稳态的正常生理过程受到干扰。超声可以检测到20ml以下的小容量胸腔积液。研究目的:探讨大量胸腔积液引流对机械通气患者氧合、血流动力学和呼吸力学的影响。方法:我们对65例机械通气患者进行了前瞻性观察研究,检查大量胸腔液引流对氧合的影响;PaO2/FiO2与呼吸力学;峰值吸气压力,平台压力,动态顺应性和总PEEP。在基线、引流后6 h和24 h分别记录血流动力学和并发症。结果:65例患者24 h平均排出积液量为(1868±640)ml, 2例发生无并发症气胸。当比较基线时;引流后6 h、24 h PaO2/FiO2比值显著提高(196.69±34.27,227.02±35.81,269.78±48.39;p<0.001),峰值吸气压力(38.23±5.71,34.14±4.70,29.89±4.58 cm H2O, p<0.001)和平台压力(21.06±3.47,18.77±3.17,15.49±2.91 cm H2O, p<0.001)显著降低,动态顺应性(17.48±4.12,21.79±4.47,26.77±4.94 ml/cm H2O, p<0.001)大幅增加。除呼吸频率显著降低(19.4±5.5、17.4±5、16.5±6.8次/min, P=0.019)外,引流对血流动力学无明显影响。结论:超声胸腔积液引流在机械通气患者中是安全的。它似乎改善氧合和呼吸力学,降低呼吸速率而不影响血流动力学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信