Lessons Learned from Using Health Literacy Strategies in a Pilot Communication Skills Program

R. Connelly, T. Turner, X. Tran, A. Giardino
{"title":"Lessons Learned from Using Health Literacy Strategies in a Pilot Communication Skills Program","authors":"R. Connelly, T. Turner, X. Tran, A. Giardino","doi":"10.2174/1874309901004010026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Limited health literacy results in poorer health outcomes, however, effective communication can facilitate understanding. Communication skills programs could incorporate strategies to address communication gaps caused by poor health literacy. Objectives: 1) to describe the effects of a pilot educational intervention on providers' knowledge and reported use of health literacy strategies; 2) to describe participants' reasons to participate and their opinions regarding the educational intervention's delivery and content. Methodology: We conducted a quasi-experimental study design with a questionnaire before, immediately after, one and three months after the intervention. Semi-structured interviews conducted one year after the intervention explored participants' opinions and experiences with the intervention and strategies. Results: Of 329 physicians invited, only 13 (3.9%) participated. Participants' mean knowledge score increased from 59.2% to 80% (p<0.001) but was lower at three months (63.3, p<0.005). Reported awareness of health literacy issues increased from 23.1% to 92.3% (p<0.001) and remained high at three months. Using simple language, limiting amount of information and checking for understanding were strategies reportedly still used at three months. Information presented was new for participants and increased their awareness of communication problems. Health literacy strategies were reportedly simple to use. Conclusions: Our program increased participants' awareness of health literacy issues and self-reported use of health literacy strategies for communication up to three months after the intervention. Future research areas should include replication with a larger sample size, objective measurement of strategies utilized by providers, and measuring patients' opinions about these strategies.","PeriodicalId":89037,"journal":{"name":"The open pediatric medicine journal","volume":"50 1","pages":"26-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open pediatric medicine journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874309901004010026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction: Limited health literacy results in poorer health outcomes, however, effective communication can facilitate understanding. Communication skills programs could incorporate strategies to address communication gaps caused by poor health literacy. Objectives: 1) to describe the effects of a pilot educational intervention on providers' knowledge and reported use of health literacy strategies; 2) to describe participants' reasons to participate and their opinions regarding the educational intervention's delivery and content. Methodology: We conducted a quasi-experimental study design with a questionnaire before, immediately after, one and three months after the intervention. Semi-structured interviews conducted one year after the intervention explored participants' opinions and experiences with the intervention and strategies. Results: Of 329 physicians invited, only 13 (3.9%) participated. Participants' mean knowledge score increased from 59.2% to 80% (p<0.001) but was lower at three months (63.3, p<0.005). Reported awareness of health literacy issues increased from 23.1% to 92.3% (p<0.001) and remained high at three months. Using simple language, limiting amount of information and checking for understanding were strategies reportedly still used at three months. Information presented was new for participants and increased their awareness of communication problems. Health literacy strategies were reportedly simple to use. Conclusions: Our program increased participants' awareness of health literacy issues and self-reported use of health literacy strategies for communication up to three months after the intervention. Future research areas should include replication with a larger sample size, objective measurement of strategies utilized by providers, and measuring patients' opinions about these strategies.
在沟通技巧试点项目中使用卫生素养战略的经验教训
导读:有限的健康素养导致较差的健康结果,然而,有效的沟通可以促进理解。沟通技巧项目可以纳入解决卫生知识贫乏造成的沟通差距的战略。目标:1)描述试点教育干预对提供者的知识和报告使用卫生素养战略的影响;2)描述参与者参与的原因以及他们对教育干预的方式和内容的意见。方法:我们采用准实验研究设计,在干预前、干预后、干预后1个月和干预后3个月分别进行问卷调查。干预一年后进行的半结构化访谈探讨了参与者对干预和策略的看法和经验。结果:329名受邀医师中,仅有13名(3.9%)参与。参与者的平均知识得分从59.2%上升到80% (p<0.001),但在三个月时下降(63.3,p<0.005)。报告的健康素养问题意识从23.1%增加到92.3% (p<0.001),并在三个月时保持较高水平。据报道,使用简单的语言、限制信息量和检查理解能力是三个月大时仍然使用的策略。所提供的资料对与会者来说是新的,提高了他们对沟通问题的认识。据报告,卫生知识普及战略易于使用。结论:我们的项目提高了参与者对健康素养问题的认识,并在干预后三个月自我报告使用健康素养策略进行沟通。未来的研究领域应该包括更大样本量的复制、对提供者使用的策略的客观测量以及对患者对这些策略的意见的测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信